Print Friendly and PDF

History Made: Brazilian Court Says No to Bayer GMO Corn, Sets New Legal Precedence

Christina Sarich
by
March 28th, 2014
Updated 05/06/2014 at 4:31 pm
Pin It

gmo brazil corns 263x164 History Made: Brazilian Court Says No to Bayer GMO Corn, Sets New Legal PrecedenceBrazilians just set an international precedence for getting rid of GMO crops through a shocking and historic legal decision made by the Federal Court of Appeals of the 4th Circuit – TRF4. The court unanimously ruled to annul a decision, previously passed by the Technical Committee on National Security (CTNBio), that would have allowed Bayer’s transgenic, GMO corn, called Liberty Link, to infiltrate the agricultural landscape of the country. This decision will create legal groundwork for other countries to get rid of biotech monopolies and force more thorough risk assessments concerning human health and environmental degradation before releasing GMO crops commercially.

Bayer is a multinational company with interests in spreading their products, like Liberty Link corn, into numerous agricultural markets. This legal action in Brazil halts that effort in an enormous way. The Federal Court’s decision was made on the grounds that insufficient studies were conducted to assess risk of Bayer’s GMO crop.

The ruling was based on a Civil Action brought forward by Terra de Direitos, translated as Land Rights, and the National Association of Small Farmers and AS-PTA, who collectively challenged the safety and legality of commercially releasing Liberty Link corn. The case was begun in 2007, and finally resolved with this GMO-shattering decision.

Finally, somewhere in the world where judges aren’t paid lackeys of Monsanto, Bayer, Syngenta, Dow, and their biotech boys-club – Federal Judge Candido Silva Alfredo Junior read his ruling for over an hour, stressing the importance for studies on the negative impacts of GMOs in all biomes. Leal Junior also pointed out that few studies had been conducted in other countries, and the law, at least in Brazil, requires that the decision of CTNBio be supported by major studies of the effect on multiple biospheres by GMO crops and the pesticide and herbicides used with them.

Additionally, the judge ordered CTNBio to be transparent, sharing studies conducted with the public via a dossier processed by the Commission, and allowing numerous experts to participate in the decisions on trade liberalization, especially concerning GMOs.

Read: France Bans GMO Corn Before Sewing Season

Judge Leal Junior’s lead was followed in full by Federal judges Marga Inge Barth Tessler, Vivian Josete Pantaleon Caminha, and Carlos Eduardo Flores Thompson Lenz. Lenz had previously voted to allow the release of transgenic crops, but changed his position, in support of Judge Leal Junior’s heroic stance calling for more unbiased science that truly assesses the dangers of GMO.

This decision will make it illegal to market genetically modified corn in North and Northeast regions of Brazil since technical studies on their effect on both humans and the ecosystem have not been carried out. This decision could possibly force all of Brazil to review other GMO crops and ban them accordingly.

A lawyer familiar with the case, for Terra de Direitos said:

After ten years of commercial release of GM crops in Brazil, the debate over the issue has intensified in more complex ways, exposing the weakness of pesticides and GMO-based agriculture. The court decision today is an important element that will add to the people’s struggle for a model of agriculture based on agroecology, which guarantees rights for farmers and healthy food without pesticides for the population.”

From around the web:

  • Appreciative reader

    Great news and information, but your credibility would be improved by having an editor who can spell, go over your copy. You mean to say precedent not precedence.
    Also, when speaking of the broadcasting to the earth of seeds, the appropriate verb is spelled sow, or sowing, not sew or sewing which refers to the mending or creation of clothing or other yardgoods.

  • pcakes

    ‘Global March Against Monsanto’ – Saturday, May 24, 2014 – Google it to find the event nearest you and join millions worldwide marching to take back our food!!

  • Paulo Andrade

    The
    story is distorted to fit an activist agenda. What the NGOs intended was the
    revoke of RN-04, a set of coexistence norms for maize (MG and conventional).
    The ban of LL corn that was never marketed in Brazil was close to nothing as a
    legal achievement. On the other hand, the unanimous decision not to revoke the
    coexistence rules was correct and definitively buried the NGO claims. Indeed,
    the legal decision was an important defeat…

    • Interested in Learning More

      Hey Paulo – I’m interested in reading more about RN-04 and the actual intentions/effects of this case. If you have any information, personal or otherwise, you could share, it would be much appreciated. Please email me at jesse [dot] rich31 [at] gmail [dot] com. Thanks in advance.