42 Comments

  1. blank linda marimpietri says:

    It makes me sad that there are now only two comments regarding this issue.

    1. A lot of people read, but don't comment – I rarely comment, unless I find another comment insulting, so don't underestimate the number of people who have read this article, and even passed it along!

    2. blank Carol Micelsen says:

      I pass on posts about GMOs on my FB page about 4-5 times a day. It is all over FB.

  2. blank .O.W.N my own stuff says:

    Hmm, could governments be silent/complicit/thick as a plank on other matters that affect us?

  3. maybe the mainstream media won't talk about it, but FB has MILLIONS of users………post, share, repeat…………….remember the shampoo commercial from the 70's……….she told 2 friends and they told 2 friends, and so on and so on and so on…………………………

  4. The corporatist goal is total dominion. That is why Monsanto and other GMO seed producers have been given legal immunity not only from independent research, but personal health damages and farmers' complaints about non-GMO field crops being contaminated by cross-pollination from patented GMO plants. But Monsanto can than sue farmers whose crops turn up with cross-pollinated produce, and those farmers not only lose the suit, they lose their farm to the corporatists. It is a plan to own and control all food stuffs on Earth!

  5. Oh happy day! My organic seedlings are proliferating!! Romaine, Red leaf, spinach, chives, carrots, and peppers!! All looking healthy without Roundup or Bt toxin!!

  6. blank Anonymous says:

    FIrst off, trying to tout an open letter that's THIRTEEN years old is hardly relevant. More importantly, have you actually looked at the list of names at the end? A vast number of them appear to not even be scientists relevant to the field (if scientists at all), let alone esteemed ones.

  7. Someone's been eating their GMO corn .We don't need the letter… The awareness plan is in effect .We will harvest the masses with the truth …….

  8. i forget what country it was in but, in protest to GMO, they burned an entire corn field. it's a start…..

  9. blank abinico warez says:

    If GMO is so harmless and equivalent, why do govt cafeterias serve only organic.

  10. Everyone needs to become aware of GMO and what the risks are!!!
    Does it not make you wonder why food stuffs cant be labelled I they contain GMOs??? Maybe the contamination is so big that it would be easier to label food what does Not contain GMOs??
    Who are the people that allow companies to patent life….how can we let this happen???
    Enough!!!! Put a stop to it NOW.

    1. the government allows it and the courts back it up.

  11. There is only ONE way to defeat GMOs. Let your money speak for you and STOP buying food that even MIGHT contain GMOs. Monsanto and the rest of the pro-GMO companies (the majority, if not all, of the big names) only understand one thing – profits. We can moan and groan about it and waste our time trying to get food labeled, but I’d bet they only laugh at us. Stop lining their pockets and I guarantee they will understand and will not be laughing any longer. When the profits stop, the GMOs will be defeated. There is absolutely no other way that will work.

    1. blank truth seeker says:

      buycott is back up and works well with a few kinks but it is back in the play store one of the best ways to boycott the companies that defend gmo's around the world

  12. blank E. Sturgess-Myers says:

    Did the Australian govt. take any notice of this letter…..As I know we have GMO Canola in my regions backyard…

  13. You think this is bad, check out plastic island….. Then you might really feel sick

  14. Read the list of signatures. It's not 800 scientists; many of them are not scientists at all. Others have PhD's but not in the life sciences (Google'd one and found his PhD was in biblical studies). It's this kind of sloppiness that makes me never trust a word that anyone promoting "natural" or "organic" solutions says.

    1. Do you prefer “troll”,or “shill”?
      It doesn’t take a PhD to recognize stupid when you see it.

  15. blank GuardDuck says:

    When will Global GMO "Experiments" STOP????

  16. blank Sallie Dodd Butters says:

    I'm eliminating one Corporation after another from my list of products to buy and or eat….We must STARVE these monsters!

  17. blank Jacqueleen says:

    Satan rules Monsanto and company…..meaning shareholders and followers. Enough is enough. Money is the root of all evil….Monsanto is evil..

  18. blank Surly Curmudgen says:

    I lean toward a ban on GMO or at the very least much tighter control over the genetic modifications. This list however of over 800 scientists does much to destroy their argument. A group of forty to fifty scientists with degrees germane to the field of plant genetics would carry much more weight than the 800 plus, many of which have a “not even close to science” degree. A long list of that nature is often used to pad a lie. The same ploy was used on climate warming.

  19. blank Derek Mathias says:

    800 scientists on the list is nothing. In the US alone there are some 600,000 scientists with degrees relevant to the GMO issue…which means 800 scientists (assuming they all even have relevant degrees) represent barely over 0.1% of the total. Interestingly, there is a similar percentage of scientists who support so-called “creation science.” In other words, 800 scientists represent the same fringe numbers as creationists.
    Thus, this article doesn’t help the anti-GMO position at all…and in fact it undercuts it severely! Too many anti-GMO complaints are based on poor or nonexistent science. If we can’t do better than that, nobody should be paying attention to the anti-GMO position anyway….

    1. Well you may have a bit of a point on that 800, and maybe not all related to the GMO debate, but they are still scientists that can read and understand studies better than the average person.
      But that being said whether or not GMO is safe is very easy to figure out, but the fact that Monsanto refuses to give it’s seeds to research groups to test independantly kind of hurts their credibility as trustworthy. Also China has turned back now 3 or more huge shipments of GMO food from the US, and they are burning some fields as well. Add that to the list of countries that are banning it either fully or partially, and you have to wonder…are all these countries wrong? Or are they right? The country list grows, the shipments being refused grows, so maybe there is something there. I don’t think all these countries are stupid. I’m sure they have their scientists that have done these studies and have found something that caused these refusals, and/or bans.
      If Monsanto wants credibility and to be trusted, let other independant firms test your seeds to see the truth.

      1. blank Derek Mathias says:

        I can’t respond to why (or even if) Monsanto won’t provide seeds for study, but popularity of a movement doesn’t necessarily correlate with fact or intelligent behavior. A good example is religion: there are literally billions of Muslims and billions of Christians in the world. Their beliefs are mutually contradictory, so at a bare minimum billions of people on one side or the other (or both) are wrong. That is why an argument from popularity is considered a fallacy.
        If there were valid studies done linking GMO products to health issues, they would be published in the scientific literature. That’s how the process works. But since every major scientific organization agrees GMO foods don’t pose a health risk, I side with their assessments.

        1. Well I thank you for your input, but religion is an intangible unprovable thing at this point. No disrespect to anyone or any religion, but to date we have no proof of any God or Gods or anyone/anything else yet, so that argument is a bit different.
          The GMO debate is quite simple. Let different firms test the seeds, and the results will show whether it is good or bad.
          And if you think that published research is not governed by higher levels of government or organizations than you need look no further than taught history, current medicine, and hey even the 911 commission report. Certain organizations and govts block or place pressure where they think is needed to get the results they need or want. That is known. So if you believe all published or rather not published information is 100 percent correct, well then I don’t know what to say.
          But why all the countries banning it, or burning the crops that they had for testing? Are all those countries following along with the ‘popularity’ of being anti-GMO?! I think not. I think they have conducted their own studies and found GMO not to be safe enough at the current time for mainstream production in their countries. There has to be something there…

        2. blank Romeo Bollen says:

          Well the point is that countries are refusing them for not being proven to be safe. By an independent research facility.
          If you ban a product after you have proven it to be unsafe, it will have already killed more than a few people especially if the effects only show up after cumulatif usage.
          We have accepted study’s in the past proving that cigarettes are healthy. And guess what, all cigarettes are now proven to be harmfull!!!

  20. IMO the 800 lb gorilla in that’s been in the room but is now in our face is a collusion – the US-Biotech BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP. Current example: “U.S. Government Ties El Salvador $277 Million Aid Package to Monsanto’s GMO Seeds”
    http://bit.ly/1kJw7j3 and
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-ritterman/us-bullying-el-salvador-monsato_b_5497701.html
    For the US, a means of strengthening imperialism by creating massive food dependency. (Fortunately for Russia, Putin appears to see the GE scam for what it is.)
    For Monsanto and their ilk of sociopathic chemical pushers the partnership is a means to protect and continue to expand their sterility-inducing fraud. The US can play both political thug and military thug for Monsanto and ilk (in case Monsanto’s own paramilitary squad can’t handle a ‘local situtaion’).
    Rape is an apt analogy. Like a rapist who won’t understand “No”, they rape DNA and they’ll rape national sovereignty as a means of propagation if they can, as in El Salvador right now.
    Government Biotech > Eaters :: Win Win > Lose
    * Over 7 years ago one of the first wicked leeks was an email about literally punishing France and the EU for questioning and resisting GMOs, authored by none other than the United States Ambassador to France. Remember? Never heard about it?
    Another example, different country, same biotech corporitis infecting Indian government …
    “India’s spying bureau serving interests of foreign corporations”
    The IB (Intelligence Bureau), India’s top intelligence agency for internal security, has spent time and public money authoring a reportthat accuses citizens’ groups, NGOs, and individuals of threatening the national economic security of India. Their crime, according to the IB, is to oppose socially and environmentally destructive “development projects”, including the introduction of GMOs. Dr Pushpa Bhargava, the father of modern biotechnology in India, joined Indian citizens and civil society organisations in condemning the report.
    “What you are seeing is not just a consolidation of seed companies, it’s really a consolidation of the entire food chain.”—Robert Fraley, co-president of Monsanto’s agricultural sector

  21. blank InvidiaAbsit AKA 800LbGorilla says:

    Where is this list of scientists?

  22. OMG! May HE save mother earth, ameeenn!

  23. While I agree with natural and organic solutions, I am finding that they do exaggerate quite a bit, which makes them at times unbelievable. However, because of your comment, I looked the signatures up and found that the majority of them ARE scientists or have a science or medicine background. So I’m not sure where you looked but I did find they seemed to be more accurate this time.

  24. blank Magnus Thunderson says:

    If GMO is so harmless and equivalent why is there such a fight against labeling it

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *