Print Friendly and PDF

Greed: Why an Accepted “Cure” for Cancer Won’t be Found

Elizabeth Renter
by
October 12th, 2013
Updated 10/12/2013 at 6:27 pm
Pin It

cure dark 263x165 Greed: Why an Accepted “Cure” for Cancer Won’t be FoundCancer kills about 1,600 people in the United States every single day. That’s 580,350 in 2013, according to the American Cancer Society. Millions if not billions of dollars every year are funneled into cancer research, yet the issue is still growing. In many cases we know what causes cancer or what increases your risk of developing cancerous tumors, but the world has yet to see a “medically accepted” ‘cure’. Why is it that during this age of great scientific strides and bright minds we can’t find a solution? Put simply: because the system won’t allow a “cure” to be found.

Cancer, though a crushing and heartbreaking disease to so many patients, friends, and families globally, is money in the bank to Big Pharma. These giant corporations post significant earnings for every case of cancer they can drag out. The longer they keep someone on their cancer-treating drugs, the more money they make. If they were to actually cure the disease—as with so many other diseases—their profits would take a considerable hit.

Mainstream medicine would label me crazy for talking this way, but Big Pharma has proven time and time again that profits, not patients, are their number one concern. Even the American Cancer Society accepts multimillion dollar contributions from pharmaceutical companies like AstraZeneca. Astrazeneca, in turn, influcnes virtually everything that the ACS does. Almost all ‘awareness’ attempts focus almost exclusively on mammography and don’t mention a word about carcinogenic foods, chemtrails, aluminum in deodorants, antiperspirants, as well as vaccines. There is no spoken word of breast cancer prevention via natural, inexpensive means, while touting the ‘cure’ of mammography and cancer drugs.

Read: Proof of Cancer ‘Cures’ Come from ‘Cured’ Patients

As reported by Mercola:

“The typical cancer patient spends $50,000 fighting the disease. Chemotherapy drugs are the most expensive of all treatments, many ranging from $3,000 to $7,000 for a one-month supply.”

This giant conspiracy to keep cancer cures out of reach began when international bankers who own Big Pharma companies took control of the medical educational system over a century ago. Then, they gave money to the American Medical Association (which is a known member of what people in the alternative news field call the ‘medical mafia’) and these schools in exchange for seats on their board and control over policy. Finally, they sealed their control by putting their people and their best interests at the top of the FDA food chain.

Read: Cancer-Fighting Foods

Natural cancer treatments have been suggested; they have been researched with very promising results, but they have been ridiculed and shoved under the rug by the medical institutions. When you suggest the cancer-killing properties of curcumin or soursop, for example, (of which both shown to have significant abilities to eradicate cancer cells while preserving healthy cells), you are laughed out of the room. These solutions aren’t being seriously considered by the medical establishment precisely because they could eradicate one of their number-one money makers.

As conscientious consumers, it’s our job to continue pushing the information that supports natural solutions and cancer prevention practices.

From around the web:

  • Carolyn in Canada

    This always irritates me when someone who has NOT had Cancer comes up with this conspiracy theory. I have survived Stage 2B Ovarian cancer due directly to the work of a top oncology surgeon and the following Chemo /steroid/ blood transfusions treatments.
    Concerning a “cure”.. the complexity of each cancer case is why there still is not a cure. Every single person who gets cancer is a unique case based on thier DNA /genetic composition.. so further to create a unique cure for that chemistry..is the real problem

    If this writer or any other preachers of slamming the medical industry are given the choice of quackery “cures” like certain foods..or trusting what the oncology scientists have progressed to.. I can bet you will go for the PROVEN chance of at least prolonging life or if lucky.. getting back to even better health than before the cancer started its hell in your body..

  • Dr. Clark Store
  • Ignatius Turchi

    Bryzinski’s antineoplastins are interesting as well as graviola, essiac tea and AHCC.

  • Ann

    What is the website address to access this film the Gershwin way.
    I was not able to access this documentary.

    • skip

      It’s Gerson, not Gershwin.

  • mike

    If anybody wants to see a good documentary on cures for all diseases look up the film the Gershwin way it cures all there only aloud to practice in Mexico and I think Canada you’ll learn a cure has been out there since the 50sits not no villainy when yahoo tried everything give this a try

    • http://www.fightingcancer.com/ Jonathan Chamberlain

      Gerson? It’s true Gershwin hits a lot of the right notes.

    • Carolyn in Canada

      cancer is abnormal cell growth.. foods have NO effect on this disease.. this is a myth.. and attempt a selling a wrong theory..