A new study released in September of this year gives even more evidence that GMOs should have been banned before they were ever allowed on the market. Read on to find out how “Genetically Engineered Crops, Glyphosate and the Deterioration of Health in the United States of America”ย pinpoints a significant correlation between GMOs and 22 diseases.
Why does the biotech industry keep hiding the toxicity of their products? Well, there are numerous reasons โ the corruption of the American and international governments, the fact that the USDAโs main man appointed by Obama was a former Monsanto executive, and the tremendously deep pockets of mega-corporations to launch propaganda campaigns โ are just a few.
The aforementioned title was published in The Journal of Organic Systems. It is full of very detailed evidence of the link between genetically modified ingredients and diseases such as liver failure, urinary and bladder cancers, hypertension, thyroid disease, stroke, obesity, and more. It is replete with telling charts and graphs that describe visually the mayhem that GMOs have unleashed on society.
Much of the study focuses on the introduction of glyphosate and its subsequent ramifications on human health. The herbicide was introduced in 1974, but the research conducted within this study relied on data since the 1990s, since that is all that was available. Since the early 90s, glyphosate use has grown astronomically.
As the study details:
โ. . .glyphosate disrupts the ability of animals, including humans, toย detoxify xenobiotics. This means that exposures to the numerous chemicals in food and the environment, such as endocrine disrupting chemicals and carcinogens, could be causing levels of damage that would not occur if the body were able to detoxify them.โ
Though the authors admit that correlation is not proof of causation, they state that:
โ. . .we have data for 22 diseases, all with a high degree of correlation and very high significance. It seems highly unlikely that all of these can be random coincidence.โ
They also bring attention to the American Academy of Environmental Medicine’s position paper on genetically modified (GM) foods:
โ[S]everal animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with GM food consumption including infertility, immune dysregulation, accelerated aging, dysregulation of genes associated with cholesterol synthesis, insulin regulation, cell signaling, and protein formation, and changes in the liver, kidney, spleen and gastrointestinal system.โ
So what did the authors of this study conclude?
There is an obvious and significant correlation between the increased use of glyphosate and genetically engineered crops grown specifically to withstand its use, and a growing multitude of diseases and their frequency. Many of the graphs show a marked increase right around the 1990s when the makers of glyphosate enjoyed a boost in their profits and an enormous swell of herbicide use from products like RoundUpย and othersย containing the same chemicals.
There is no mistaking the data – the large increase in glyphosate use in the US is mostly due to the increase in glyphosate-resistant GE crops โ and this has led to more disease.
The researchers state:
โThe probabilities in the graphs and tables show that it is highly unlikely that the correlations are aย coincidence. The strength of the correlations shows that there is a very strong probability that they are linked somehow. The number of graphs with similar data trends also indicates a strong probability thatย there is a link. Although correlation does not necessarily mean causation, when correlation coefficients of over 0.95 (with p-value significance levels less than 0.00001) are calculated for a list of diseases that can be directly linked to glyphosate, via its known biological effects, it would be imprudent not to consider causation as a plausible explanation.โ
Sure there are many reasons for chronic disease โ diet, lack of exercise, exposure to other environmental toxins, and even genetic predisposition among them, but when your body canโt rid itself of a known carcinogen because it is added straight to the food supply in copious amounts โ of course you are going to get sick. It doesnโt take 22 charts to figure that out. After all, glyphosate is appearing in people’s urine, blood, and breast milk.
Since glyphosate is also an endocrine disruptor, this would imply that the current permitted residue levels in food could be causing multipleย health problems that have been documented in the scientific literature.
The endocrine system is essential to human health. Since it is being attacked by biotech chemicals on a daily basis,ย the glands in our bodies like the pituitary, thymus, and pineal canโt secrete hormones that keep us fit, healthy, and disease-free.
All of these functions are carried out by the endocrine system:
- Growth and development
- Homeostasis (the internal balance of body systems)
- Metabolism (body energy levels)
- Reproduction
- Response to stimuli (stress and/or injury)
Of course, the body will start to respond with disease-like symptoms when the metabolism, reproductive system, and nervous system are constantly trying to right themselves due to glyphosate exposure.
We are the guinea pigs of biotech โ a grand science experiment gone wrong (or right depending on who you talk to and the motives suspected behind biotech technologies).
The researchers urge independent scientific research. They expound:
โThe data presented in this paper highlight the need for independent scientific research to be conducted, especially in the areas of the endocrine disruption, cancer precursor, oxidative stress, gut microbiome and the Cytochrome P450 pathways. It is our hope that, in addition to more basic research in the form of toxicology and carcinogenic studies, epidemiology studies will be undertaken by experts in each of these disease categories.โ
In my estimation, there is already ample evidence, even with the biotech white-wash and out-right manipulation of universities, non-profits, and scientific journals, that GMOs are dangerous.
So, until we are able to ban all GMO crops completely, add these 10ย GMO foods to your GMO foods list so you can more easily avoid them. You can alsoย avoid the eight main GM crops:
- Corn
- Soybeans
- Canola
- Cottonseed
- Sugar Beets
- Most Hawaiian Papaya
- Some Zucchini and Yellow Squash
- Sugar Derived from GMO Sugar Beets
- Dairy is additionally likely to be GMO unlessย it isย labeled No rBGH, rBST, or artificial hormones.
Below are some of the key charts from the Journal of Organic Systems study. You can also read the full study on the correlation between GMO and 22 different diseases for more details.
Additional Sources:
Alternet
A couple of things. “Dairy is additionally likely to be GMO unless it is labeled NO rBHG, rBST or artificial hormones” – this isn’t exactly correct – milk can have these labels and the still be GMO by the fact that the animals from which the milk is derived are eating a GMO diet – either Organic or Non-GMO labels will let you know if the product is GMO free (maybe). Also, GMO disrupt, change and/or destroy DNA, the instruction booklet of the body – once the DNA has been altered then the body no longer has the instruction manual on how to fix things that go wrong. I’m glad you pointed out that GMOs ought to be outright banned, seeing as how labeling is like putting a Band-Aid on a severed artery.
I eat and drink everything organic. I refuse to touch all those chemicals in the grocery store. It changed my life for the better in SO many ways, when I switched over to organic! There are many people who still don’t even KNOW what GMO means. I pass the word around every chance I get, how it changed my life just switching to simple, clean, nutritious foods. For one thing, just by quitting milk and diary, and switching to organic nut milks (I make my own now), and organic dairy, I lost 50 pounds. All it takes is to read, listen to others, and to finally sink in….of all the poisons their putting in regular grocery store “food”….some people just can’t face the facts about what “they” are putting our foods, and that is so sad.
Very informative. Author โThe Art of Debt Guerrilla Warfare, how to beat debt collectors when your back is against the wall.โ
Thanks but.. what’s the got to do with the article here?
I think C. Gonzo’s point is very clear. Not only are GMO products increasing, they are a part of meat and dairy that is not mentioned here. Nor is anyone talking about the experiments done in Germany or Switzerland w/ lab rats producing huge tumors at three generations of GMO food consumption. Issues involving sterility, smaller heart and liver at birth, compromised immune function and other odds and ends.
The real issues is labeling GMO’s not where we find them or how much they are taking over american food production. The other side of this shit when they can no longer sell it or feed it is a sterile land mass that we cant use.
Go organic and support your local growers. Then you know what’s in it.
peace
I appreciate your intelligence on GMO’s and organics. I switched over about 5 years ago to eating and drinking nothing but organics. I’ve learned how to make my own nut milks, and how to make all kinds of healthy meals. But I just want to say, those “local growers” everyone always says to support? They spray just as much chemicals, as the big field growers. I grow my own garden and just buy organics from reputable companies….I don’t support local growers, when their just as bad as the big growers.
Please provide a citation for this study, as I am a biology student currently, and to the best of my professor’s knowledge (a double PhD in genetics and food technology) there has never been such a study other that the discredited Seralini et al paper.
Basically nothing we eat is not genetically modified from the original plant or animal.
Rather it is selective breeding over decades or adding genes the net effect is it is engineered. Try eating the unmodified Aztec corn – you would not even recognize the product as food.
With all advancement comes risk but surely we can all agree that live expectancy and quality of life in the Developed nations has improved greatly over the last 100 years.
Since time began the opposing entity to what All God has created has been on a mission to trump his hand of creation. Sign of the Time….. This world has ruled nothing will stop or injure the genetic corruption taking place on earth and being mixed to shred the DNA and RNA of everything, including souls to take. Being made in his image has just been spliced and unrecognized to the One who has the greatest patent for eternal life. May God help us and know us Amen .
Who here actually read the study, i didn’t but really this is simply a correlational analysis, and we should know that correlation does not equal causation, this is irresponsible reporting, to put it lightly, this is sensationalism at it’s finest. People who want to do actual research on anything controversial don’t stand a chance because this kind of rhetoric dominates the internet landscape and is aimed to persuade rather than show the facts.
Glyphosate is a herbicide, designed to kill weeds and the produce has been genetically modified to resist it. Which, if either of these is the cause for the rise in these diseases could it be when presenting the correlational data, who knows if it isn’t the increase in McDonalds food consumption? Maybe the sharp increase was because of “Full House” ending also in 1995?
All I’m saying is this: QUESTION EVERYTHING YOU READ ONLINE!
You are correct that correlation does not equal causation, however, many others have posted articles referring to similar research. At the VERY least, there is reason to proceed with caution regarding GMOs. No, I did not read the original research paper linked to this article, but I am willing to go out on a limb here and give the authors some credit. And I did biochemistry research for 10 years, so I have some idea what I’m talking about.
So please stop being a shill for Monsanto. They get far more positive press than they deserve.
I’m not saying we shouldn’t do more research into GMO’s, what I’m trying to say is that this article is big horn with flashing lights, that is to say, the article is doing nothing more than spreading hysteria.
The end of the article is a list of foods to be avoided until they ban all GMO’s not a call for caution and more research. It’s great that you have a decade of experience in biochemistry, maybe then you can at least differentiate the hysteria from the actual result of the study and what these results mean.
Not all, but most people either lack the skills to think critically of the things they read online, and it has become a cesspool of ignorance from people jumping to conclusions and blogging without any kind of reproach because their audience is generally peers who are paranoid hysterical people who are only hearing what they are already convinced is true. I am highly doubtful that we will see a follow up article on perhaps a study that came as a result of this one, isolating the herbicide variable and narrowing the scope of this issue. I would gladly read and be open to any outcome and then make an opinion, or see more supporting studies. because thats how science works.
I’m not for or against GMO at this time but really it’s time for people to start questioning what they read online…
That sounds reasonable. It is, however, difficult to get independent (not corporate-funded) research these days.
That is why my major professor at MD Anderson lamented. “I wish we could get funding to study the effects of Vitamin C on cancer…but there’s no money available for that.” That is because such research doesn’t lead to a drug that can be marketed. Vitamins can’t be patented.
There are many independent studies that have been conducted on GMOs. The ‘no independent studies’ fallacy is put forward by the anti-GMO agenda all the time.
By way of one example: Australia’s government agencies that protect our biodiversity are stringent in their studies in looking for any possible harmful effects from introduced crops, as they had some disasters in the 1970s with the introduction of some species here.
The CSIRO has extensively studied GMO crops for over a decade and continue to do so. They have found no greater effects on soils, animals, livestock or humans than non-GMO. They have found that yield has improved with drought-resistant crops in our pretty dry country.
I’m not ‘For GMO’, but I’m against fear-mongering junk science that claims correlation = causation.
Correct,
http://gmopundit.blogspot.com/p/450-published-safety-assessments.html
Thats like riding the fence, and not being for God or the devil!! You should make a stand, and the right one….or you’ll lose in the end! I do TONS of reading, I happen to LOVE reading EVERYTHING i can find. And I love health, so I’ve read and read and read more than anyone…about GMO’s and Monsanto, and everything in between about this subject. I have NO questions whatsoever about the awfulness of GMO’s….and if you were smart, you’d stop riding that fence…and make a decision….your HEALTH is depending on it!!
OH SNAP! Religion rides into town… The fact you’ve brought your imaginary friends to the table has dismissed your opinions. Bringing religion to a science argument is like bringing a rubber chicken to a gunfight. Forget it Joan, science doesn’t need input from those who believe in fairy tales.
Just like religion, “There shouldn’t even be anymore questions about the subject!” is the same argument. “Get your pesky science facts away from me! The bible says it’s true – there shouldn’t even be anymore questions about the subject!”
Calling someone a shill for pointing out facts makes you look like a total douchebag and destroys your credibility. It is the last line used by idiots who can’t defend a loosing position in an argument.
Well guess you haven’t heard the latest news then? Monsanto’s GMO’s are being banned in what?…14 countries now…and rising? Their getting kicked to the curb, and man does that make me happy. Also their stocks are dropping big time! Ah, how wonderful to hear! The positive press is getting pretty darn negative lately!
Right on, Joan. Here’s a link to 40 scientific studies outlining the dangers of GMO food. http://naturalsociety.com/over-40-rodent-feeding-studies-show-gm-food-is-disastrous-to-health/
ok, I’m QUESTIONING YOUR POST.
Doesn’t make any sense…..
I like to remember that Prof Eguiazu our Professor of Environmental Technogeny at the University of Rosario en Argentina . teach uns that the risks of genetical engineered crops are very high. He discusses with the scientists thet deffended the GM crops in a Food Science Congress and in the open TV in the centre of the soybean producent area in Argentina. His Institute the INCABIE was closen with violence in year 2002. Egiazu was the founder of the technopathogenology and in Argentina the first Dr in agricultural sciences at the National Research Council and at a National University
I find it interesting that Russian President, Putin, has banned GMO food and is being portrayed in western media as a brutal dictator who doesn’t give a damn about Russian people. It looks like just the opposite is true.
Putin any day over washington filth.
You do know that he is not a supporter of gay rights, correct? That he is not even a supporter of gay LIFE?
Putin supports Russian values. Get used to it. America supports criminal banking, militarized police and fraud. So be it. America has the right to support what they want without interference from other nations. So does Russia and every other nation. Who is America to force their values on other countries?
Who is Russia to do the same as they have done in so many areas. I remember Russian Tanks in eastern Europe as a child. Russian troops in Afghanistan. and on and on.
That’s the point. Russia is NOT doing things that happened in the past, today. There are no Russian tanks in Eastern Europe today. The OSCE has stated the Russian military has not crossed the border with Ukraine.
As for history, how about Japan attacking Pearl Harbour, America needlessly dropping nuclear bombs on Japan, Germany invading France and most of Europe in WWII, Italy supporting Germany’s aggression, America lying about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction to destroy that country, and on and on. Do you hate America, Germany, Japan, Italy and others who did these things in the past?
Japan attacking Pearl is about as relevant to this stupid author’s claim of 22 diseases as Custer invading the Black Hills. http://www.newsweek.com/putins-secret-warriors-tales-three-russian-soldiers-sent-fight-ukraine-339665 quit lying.
And this is any different from what the US has….and is….doing, how?
Well that just makes him a REAL man. An intelligent man. Men fuc*ing men is just the nastiest, immoral, sexual conduct there could ever be. Besides these people who do this nasty junk, or even the ones who say it’s fine or ok. just belong to satan.
Danger! Danger! Bigoted religious twat alert!!
“Waaaaa… you’re not allowing me to force my beliefs on you and your life.. waaa… Christian persecution…. waaaaa”.
Gross
umm why is this being discussed on an article about gmo related diseases
Yes, he’s great. He has political opponent assassinated. He supresses free speech. He passes anti-gay laws. He destroys food brought in while people in his country are suffering severe food shortages, because they haven’t paid the Putin tax on them…Yep, you should hold him up on a pedestal for the great decisions he makes.
Nemtsov’s murder was a pretty obvious false flag. With an approval rating of over 85% in Russia, Putin stood to gain NOTHING from his death. Only the anti-Putin crowd stood to gain. Cui bono?
There is no law against homosexuality in Russia except when it is openly displayed in public. As Putin said in Sochi, “Leave our children alone.” It’s what Russians want and in Russia, they make the rules, not America. America can set whatever laws Americans want and Russians have no say in it.
Russia doesn’t have food shortages today. It’s true they now destroy contaminated food at the border as well as food imports that don’t follow Russian food laws. The goal is to have Russian food the safest and most healthy food in the world. Why would a good leader allow contaminated food to enter the food chain?
Putin also doesn’t allow chemtrails, or families to be foreclosed on and thrown into the street, people can collect rainwater without a government permit and his government has almost the lowest debt of any major country, just 18% of GDP, so children don’t grow up as debt slaves.
Sounds like a good leader to me!
Any credibility you may think you have evaporated the moment you said ‘chemtrails’, firmly placing you in the lunatic fringe.
1. I have been to Russia and still have many friends there. Many stores in Russia outside of Moscow or St. Pete are looking like they did in the Soviet days – bare shelves. The food being destroyed isn’t contaminated, it’s just ‘not approved’. Russia is more a slave nation to the rich oligarchs than the US. Your lack of understanding of this is obvious.
http://www.businessinsider.com.au/russian-inflation-hits-8-and-there-are-food-shortages-2014-10
2. I am a pilot, they’re contrails. If you think they are anything different, you need to learn some basic chemistry and meteorology. I’m happy to explain it to you, but I don’t know if you’re too far down that rabbit hole already to be able to critically assess the facts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory
3. No, the consumer report said it contained enterococcus/e-Coli in the raw burger meat. The sensationalist headline (which you obviously have great difficultly differentiating from fact) stated ‘faeces’ in the burgers. e-Coli exists naturally in the lower gut of most mammals. It is easily destroyed via cooking – the story is really about “don’t eat uncooked meat”.
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/08/27/how-safe-your-ground-beef
Here’s a hint for better living you obviously missed: If these sites you seem to be getting your news from DON’T link to the actual research (like the cited one, with no actual links to actual research that supports the story), they’re probably making it up. If the DO – Read it for yourself. More than likely what they report is NOT what the study says.
4. Putin’s approval rating is more complex than you think. He’s an ultra-nationalist, which the old Communists like. He’s distracting people from their troubles at home by supporting ‘nationalist’ wars, such as annexing parts of Ukraine. Like Bush, only with (somehow) less ethics or morals.
When you learn to read and comprehend, particularly the facts behind the headlines, rather than accept everything your read from Natural News, Consumer Reports, Mother Jones and Dr Mercola (all confirmed crank sites), maybe you’ll have a chance. For now, you’ve lost it.
Here’s a public hearing in Shasta County California, where doctors, neurologists, military technicians, pilots, Defense Industry technicians, biologists and lawyers give testimony about Chemtrails.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeTaejpg18g#t=96
Your comment about conditions in Russia is EXACTLY opposite to what a Ukrainian artist just posted about his visit to Russia. http://fortruss.blogspot.ru/2015/08/ukraine-vacation-in-russia-and-open.html
Sure, because free speech, to criticize the government, is everywhere in Russia!
Having been there myself (have you?), and having friends in St Petersburg…. no, there is little allowed in terms of ‘unapproved’ information. It is still pretty tightly controlled, and even dissension is filtered to provide a perception of freedoms.
How is it you believe that your country hides the truth, yet believe the opposite about a country you know nothing about?
Actually, I know much about Russia. I lived in Russia for more than 10 years so my experience is first hand. There are plenty of people who openly criticize the government, just like people do with their governments everywhere. No one is afraid of getting a visit from the government because they dare to have an opinion.
As for hiding the truth, America for example, has secret laws, secret interpretations of laws, secret courts, secret prisons, secret trade deals (TPP for example), secret gold holdings that can’t be audited, a Federal Reserve that refuses to allow an audit of their activities, a secret Continuity of Government plan that is so secret, even the people’s representatives in the US government aren’t allowed to know what’s in it, secret evidence that even those indefinitely detained under the Patriot Act can’t even know why they are being detained, secret government spying on US citizens, secret FEMA camps, and on and on. Not exactly the hallmark of an open and free society, is it. How is it possible that anyone can doubt that the truth is being hidden in the West?
To assume that any government hides things from the population is naive, James. To assume that it means their is a giant government conspiracy because of it is delusional.
I worked in the military for years, and I know there is much that is not told to the public or media. But I also KNOW that most of what you seem to think is real is total BS. To then somehow think that you’re Utopian Ideal of Russia is not simply an illusion presented to a Westerner, you’re kidding yourself in too many ways.
I cannot begin to imagine how hard your life must be believing in so many blatantly hysterical conspiracy theories. You’re paranoia must be beyond epic.
Good for you.
I do know far more than you ever will. I know that you are so far wrong it’s laughable.
An ad hominem attack means responding to arguments by attacking a person’s character, rather than addressing the content of their arguments. It’s an old tactic used by those in a weak position. The user of an ad hominem attack is demonstrating for all to see that they have nothing more of value to add.
I think I’ll just let your “comment” go without rebuttal.
James, while you fail to see the irony in your own comments, I am genuinely disappointed that you are so lost to your theories that you decide the most illogical answers are the most likely. That does make you a gullible individual, and from your unshakable belief in other easily and often discredited theories, it does also enforce your seeming paranoia.
It’s not ad hominem. It’s an observation.
It’s also not possible to attack the argument of someone who holds such wild beliefs. All I can say is that I have seen first hand what you claim, and you are wrong.
You pretty much discredited yourself with the whole ‘New World Order’ approach to a science argument, then set yourself behind your own castle walls of ignorance, believed that your almost cult-like beliefs are unfalsifiable.
Really James, there is almost no one on this forum who want’s to learn about how GMOs work, educate themselves on biology, or even cares about how the GMO decisions of other countries are going against their own nations scientist’s opinion for purely political reasons.
But hey, it’s not like we haven’t seen irrational fears grip the uneducated masses before. Even some of the same players have surfaced – including the likes of Seralini – who sent the aspartame scare around the world (until people started to realise his study to “find” cancer from aspartame was wholly funded by the US Sugar Industry).
As for my “wild beliefs”, here are 40 scientific studies from around the world that also disagree with the US government position that GMO food is safe. There are many more if you bother to look. http://naturalsociety.com/over-40-rodent-feeding-studies-show-gm-food-is-disastrous-to-health/ .
Would you call these scientists, gullible, paranoid, ignorant, irrational, uneducated, “cultists” with “wild beliefs”, too?
Thousands of professional engineers and architects do not believe the government’s explanation of how the 3 world trade center buildings fell because the government explanation violates the laws of physics. Most of these professionals are American. Here’s a list of over 2,000 of them. You can click on their profiles and see what their qualifications are. http://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/ae.html#:/signatures/xml/supporters/U/JonKeiserEdwardsCOUS.xml.txt
They don’t believe the American government, either. Would you call these people gullible, paranoid, ignorant, irrational, uneducated, “cultists” with “wild beliefs”, too?
In regards to you first comment, look what USA Today says about imported food to America. It is rarely inspected and is often contaminated. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-04-16-imported-food_N.htm
Contaminated, imported food exists and Russia is doing something about it. This is not a bad thing.
Regarding your point number 2, I am a licensed car driver and have been for many years but that doesn’t make me an authority on the science of automotive emissions any more than being a pilot makes you an expert on chemtrails.
A few years ago, there was a panic to get rid of aluminum in underarm deodorant because of it’s toxic effect. Now we are finding nano-aluminum in soil, plant and animals as well as the air we breathe. Nano aluminum doesn’t exist naturally. The US military has declared that they are engaged in geoengineering and have stated they will be able to completely control weather by 2020. After chemtrails are spotted above, communities find dust laden with aluminum, barium and other toxic materials. It isn’t magic that puts them there.
Your point number 3, why does the USDA issue recalls for tonnes of meat when they find E Coli bacteria present? People get ill and some die. Apparently E Coli is not as easily destroyed by cooking as you suggest.
James, your irrational paranoia and gullibility for conspiracy theories, plus your ability to engage in confirmation-bias internet search doesn’t make you an expert on any of the above.
However, as pilot, I had to complete several units on meteorology, aerodynamics and the theory of flight, all of which (as well as high-school chemistry) can clearly demonstrate how and why contrails occur.
Nano-aluminium is added to jet fuel as a catalyst.
https://www.metabunk.org/jet-fuel-additives-composition-and-usage.t1041/
No, Russia isn’t just destroying contaminated food (although this is a claim they make, just like the claim that they aren’t supporting the Russian rebels in Ukraine). They are destroying food that is being brought in from many countries because it isn’t taxed, hasn’t come through the correct channels (i.e. the bribes haven’t been paid), or because the government has an anti-science bent against it.
Apart from ‘geoengineeringwatch’ and other ‘truther’ sites, where exactly have the US military supposed to have said this? Seriously, the fact that you obviously reference to these sites in lieu of science is disturbing.
Luckily, your ignorance of science doesn’t stop it being true.
They get ill and die from not cooking correctly (too low heat, too ‘rare’ steak), it’s not too hard to see. As for the USDA comment, even you can jump on the USDA website and see their ‘safe levels’ of bacteria. Virtually everything we touch has E-Coli present. It’s the strain and quantity that is the issue. Proper cooking destroys almost 100% of dangerous E-Coli, while our stomachs generally take care of the rest.
Wow, how sad it is for anyone that doesn’t want to face the facts on chemtrails, Just ignorant, and blind. A pilot? ppfffttt. so sad that they’ve brainwashed you.
And your credentials are… ? I cannot believe you are capable of even functioning in normal society, you are so lost in your psychosis.
I can get in an aircraft in the right weather conditions and make my own contrails. It’s actually easy if you have the right moisture level in the air, a clear day and either a good wing-angle or hot exhaust (turbine engines).
Chemtrails are harder to make – you require far too much stupid and gullibility for me to achieve that.
Seriously, Joan. Loosen the tin foil, it’s cutting off the oxygen to your brain.
PS – maybe if your religion hadn’t choked your intellect and ability to learn, you could take a basic chemistry class, or even spend five minutes on the internet and watch some videos that show either a) how easy it is for an aircraft to make a contrail, or b) just how stupid the chemtrail conspiracy theory is.
As for only lunatics believe in chemtrails, you might want to hear Douglas E. Rowland from the Goddard Space Flight Center talk about chemtrails. He admits there actually several different types of chemtrails that they are experimenting with. http://www.zengardner.com/nasa-admits-chemtrails-lithium-test/
Would he be one of those “lunatics” you’re talking about?
I agree!
Very ignorant of you to link the invader of Ukraine to a technology that is safe and has been used as such since the invention of G.E. insulin.
Can you tell me the date of the invasion of Ukraine? We know the date of every mayor invasion in history but nobody knows when this happened. Doesn’t anyone wonder why that is? Obviously, it never happened. No shots fired, no rebellion by citizens of Crimea and a recent French government delegation to Crimea says that what they were told is not how things are in Crimea. In other words, they were lied to. Now other countries. like Germany, are lining up to visit and see if they were told lies, too.
As for GMO technology being safe, the only long term studies done, which happened in Europe, have shown eating GMO food causes animals to die prematurely. The experiment being conducted on US citizens and other countries permitting GMOS food will have to wait for several generations to see the results. Thierry Vrain, former research scientist for Agriculture Canada, says GMO’s offer no benefits, just risk.
The “GMO’s are safe” mantra was cooked up by the people who gave you “Saddam has weapons of mass destruction” and “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.” Apparently P.T. Barnam was right. You CAN fool some of the people all of the time.
Thierry Vrain has sold out. Why I do not understand. https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/once-more-bad-science-in-the-service-of-anti-gmo-activism/ And we will not need to wait several generations as the livestock raised including long lived breeders and dairy animals have had no proven issues with g.e. feed. Please post your so-called studies with animals dying prematurely so that I can have a good laugh. And the lack of publicity in Ukraine was by design. First send in a few. Then a few more posing as local rebels. Putin is a sorry excuse for a leader and a man. BTW you can’t rebel against an invader. So, wrong there as well.
How about this one – “results of a long-term, peer-reviewed study conducted by a group of scientists led by Dr Judy Carman of the Institute of Health and
Environmental Research in Australia has been released โ and it proves
that GMO are anything but โsafe.โ
http://www.nationofchange.org/first-long-term-study-released-pigs-cattle-who-eat-gmo-soy-and-corn-offers-frightening-results-13723
Or this one – http://www.responsibletechnology.org/gmo-dangers/65-health-risks/1notes
Or this one – “a new study published in the Journal of Organic Systems
finds that pigs raised on a mixed diet of GM corn and GM soy had higher
rates of intestinal problems, โincluding inflammation of the stomach
and small intestine, stomach ulcers, a thinning of intestinal walls and
an increase in haemorrhagic bowel disease, where a pig can rapidly
โbleed-outโ from their bowel and die.โ Both male and female pigs reared
on the GM diet were more likely to have severe stomach inflammation, at a
rate of four times and 2.2 times the control group, respectively.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/leslie-hatfield/damning-new-study-demonst_b_3424148.html
All you have to do is look for these studies, there are hundreds of them.
Apparently you didn’t hear about World War II where European countries invaded by Germany were constantly attacked by organized resistance movements. More recently, the American military invaded Iraq, and Afghanistan and suffered constant attacks from resistance movements.
Hahaha Judy Carmen. Really? She’s an anti-GMO activist who has even had her University admonish her for her shoddy work. The national Food Standards body tore her deliberately misleading ‘study’ (that has more holes than sieve) to pieces.
http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/consumer/gmfood/Pages/Response-to-dr-Carman's-study.aspx
Seriously, James? You’re a f**king idiot if you really believe that Russia didn’t support the separatists in the Ukraine, let alone deny it altogether. Sure, so now Malaysian airliners shoot themselves down?
I can say unequivocally that, although it isn’t legally an invasion (as Putin isn’t openly or publicly supporting the separatists), Russia is supplying all their military hardware, and training their personnel. In NATO circles, this is not a big secret.
You have an extremely overactive imagination, James, as well as a problem separating facts from conspiracy theories. It’s sad you have to live in such a paranoid state.
Wrong is right with the Politicians in the USSA
We will have gmo’s, until they no longer yield a profit!
I agree; notice how anti-fracking is gaining ground now that it’s not profitable……
More than 90% of our grains and cereals including rice (UK and abroad) are subject to a pre-harvest spraying of roundup herbicide – a new but insane practice started in 2003. This has massively increased residue levels to 100 PPM and more, of this noxious substance in our bread and cereal. Research has clearly shown that roundup/glyphosate is responsible for cancers, endocrine disruption and cardiac arrythmia. The american government which is in the pocket of the makers of glyphosate last year massively increased the permitted residue levels in farm produce anywhere from 2 times to 25 times depending on the food stuff. Now they want to force this noxious waste and their gmo waste on europe by way of TTIP that is, if you are not already eating this garbage and you easily could be. Are you one of the million+ people who in the UK have atrial fibrillation? Bread or cereal is very possibly the cause.
The modern agriculture must be implanted if it is necessary with iolence. The professor Eguiazu the first Dr in agricultural sciences in the National Research Council in Argentina, discovered Aflatoxin B1 in 1975 in Plata maize. Afterthat he done a thesis on the prophylaxis an on detection of aflatoxins and Apergillus flavus/parasiticus in a Nutrition center in germany.
Returned to Argentina in year 1984 he grounded the Institute for Biological Quality and Ecotoxicology and the Cathedra of Enmvironmental Technogeny.
The “peers” in the National Research Council mobbed him, and the research received no funds. The problem was a paper”Plaguicidas y error tecnogenico” at the first Congres of Ecotoxicology in Buenos Aires in 1967 where he demonstrates that quite an half of the pesticides to be used in Argentina were cancerogenic.
He was mobbed till 2002 , his institute was closen with violence. before this time he was categorized by the Ministery of Education and Science in Argentina as Research Category I the highest, but no by agricultural sciences by medical sciences. hes is the grounder of the technopathogenology a science that is places in preventive health sciences buy have as research object the technique.
He discussed in congresses of Foods and open TV against the managers of biotechnology and demonstyrates the high risk of the gentic engineered crops. He met and know very well the life of others whistleblowers as prof Pusztai of Aberdeen.
Nope, it is used by about 40% of hard cereal farmers in the north west part of Europe and less than 10% of hard cereals in North America (mostly Canadians)
Its funny how many Pro-GMO’s claim that there are no side effects of GMO’s this is the best list I’ve found so far. BTW there are studies now that show that the action of manipulating or modifying itself causes harmful side effects as well.
post them or shut up.
Shame on you, Christina Sarich, you pathetic anti-science shill. Did you know there is ‘a significant and very strong correlation between the rise in consumption of organic food and the number of diagnosed cancer cases’ also? Anyone with any respect for actual science understands that you can correlate some crazy things if you want to. But also that correlation doesn’t equal causation.
Another flawed, biased study in an admitted biased, anti-GMO and pro-organic journal, paid for by an organic food association, that produces no causal evidence – it might as well start with “Once upon a time…”
Even the journal itself has been discredited, to the point it doesn’t even have an impact factor (i.e. NO SCIENTIFIC ORGANISTION ACKNOWLEDGES IT). You simply discredit anything that Monsanto sponsors, yet your hypocrisy seems to be limitless when the findings support your views? This journal has less scientific cred than Marvel Comics.
My Japan attacking Pearl Harbour comment wasn’t meant to be a comment on the article, it was meant to be in regards to your comment where you claim what Russia did many years ago makes them evil today.
And as the newsweek article and this one shows. They are still up to the same crap. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26644082 and https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/08/28/Dont-forget-about-Russias-invasion-Crimea/ Putin is vermin. There was no threat to the Russian navy base. Phony excuse for land theft. And still no 22 diseases.
Again, what’s the date of this invasion? You can’t tell me because it never happened! Viktor Muzhenko, the head of Ukraineโs General Staff, just admitted 90% of Ukraine’s intelligence re Donbas last year was false but if you choose to continue to believe it, please feel free to do so. http://www.rt.com/news/313853-ukraine-intelligence-info-untrue/
Do you rely solely on conspiracy theory websites for your entire world view? You are one sad individual, living in such a paranoid delusion.
The saddest part of all is that you probably truly believe that only you and a handful of similarly deluded conspiracy theorists know the truth and everyone else is brainwashed. Well, sorry to burst your bubble, but it’s just not so.
I have had far more insight into the facts and evidence behind much of this than you could ever hope to gain from your nut-bag collection of collaborators, James.
Enjoy your delusional paranoia, but it just isn’t real.
Wow, Seeing so many artificial food colors injected into the tomato reminds me we put some many pesticide, plant growth regulators or artificial food color into our food system. But I never heard of we can change plant genes with a syringe, but I did know we can change human genes in an egg cells by inject some nuclear content. Should we use other pictures to show the point?
Eric and James why not take your talk to a sight about Russian, Japan, and American history this page is about gom food and how they are making us sick, why dont you leave the grownups page and take you arguments to facebook or some other useless social medea, where brain dead people can follow you and be intertained.