MIT Scientist: Glyphosate to Cause Autism in 50% of Children by 2025
The chemical brew is sickening us all
autistic
As if to corroborate a growing trend in rising autism rates, a senior research scientist from MIT has warned that of all children, a disquieting 50% will be autistic by 2025. What’s the culprit? Monsanto’s best selling Round-Up containing glyphosate is top on the list.
The overuse of glyphosate in our food supply is causing diseases like Alzheimer’s, autism, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and nutrition al deficiencies, among others. Stephanie Seneff, PhD, a research biologist who has published over 170 scholarly peer-reviewed articles, and has studied these diseases for more than three decades, points to GMOs as a major contributor to neurological diseases in children.
At a recent conference, Dr. Seneff declared:
“At today’s rate, by 2025, one in two children will be autistic.”
Currently, one in every 68 children in the US is born with autism. It is currently the fastest growing developmental disability, with rates having increased by almost 120% since the year 2000. In ten years, the cost of treating those affected by autism will cost us $400 billion annually, in addition to the untold emotional costs which families pay daily to live with and support a child with autism.
Dr. Seneff noted that the symptoms of glyphosate toxicity closely resemble those of autism. She also presented data at the conference which shows an oddly consistent correlation between the use of Roundup on crops (and the creation of Roundup-ready GMO crop seeds) with rising rates of autism.
The correlation between the two include biomarkers such as zinc and iron deficiency, low serum sulfate, seizures, and mitochondrial disorders.
A fellow panelist who was in attendance reported that after Dr. Seneff’s presentation:
“All of the 70 or so people in attendance were squirming, likely because they now had serious misgivings about serving their kids, or themselves, anything with corn or soy, which are nearly all genetically modified and thus tainted with Roundup and its glyphosate.”
Read: Sick People Have High Levels of Glyphosate in Urine
Dr. Seneff pointed out that much of the food on grocery store shelves contains GM corn and soy, all with small amounts of glyphosate traces in them. This includes soft drinks sweetened with high fructose (and genetically modified) corn syrup, chips, cereals, candies, and even soy protein bars. Much of our beef and poultry is also fed a diet of GM corn and soy, which contain glyphosate traces as well.
Think your bread is safe? Think again. Wheat is often sprayed with Round Up chemicals just prior to harvest, which means unless your bread or wheat products are non-GM certified, and organic, they likely contain traces of glyphosate.
When you add it all up – we are dining on glyphosate in almost every food we eat, and it is causing serious illness. Dr. Seneff says that though the traces of glyphosate in each food may not be large, it is their cumulative effect that is of concern. Her worry seems well-founded considering that pregnant women have been found to have glyphosate in their blood and urine, and it has even showed up in fetal cells.
Although glyphosate is not likely the only chemical to blame for increased autism rates, it tops the list of unsavory, neurologically-altering substances.
In addition to this toxic environment, there is a arguable link between vaccines and autism. A former CDC employee blew the lid off one such story finding the connection, and to it can be added other studies now showing a link between children’s exposure to pesticides and autism.
Add to glyphosate chemicals and vaccines which contain mercury – PCBs, PBDEs, and phthalates, and a perfect brew for autism rates to soar becomes apparent.
A few months ago, the USDA released a study finding that although there were detectable levels of pesticide residue in more than half of food tested by the agency, 99% of samples taken were found to be within levels the government deems “safe.” How can the government deem something safe if it has never been tested singularly – let alone how the effects from multiple exposures (PCBs, mercury, glyphosate, etc.) can devastate a child’s immune system and neurological soundness when considered together?
Though autism is a complex problem with many potential causes. Dr. Seneff’s data is particularly significant considering how close the correlation is—and because the claim is supported by a scientist with impeccable credentials.
|
| Christina Sarich is a humanitarian and freelance writer helping you to Wake up Your Sleepy Little Head, and See the Big Picture. Her blog is Yoga for the New World. Her latest book is Pharma Sutra: Healing the Body And Mind Through the Art of Yoga. |
You really should be ashamed of yourself.
It was stressed whether adverse effects in these trials were only observed at the highest glyphosate doses.
Glyphosate, pathways to modern diseases III: Manganese, neurological diseases, and associated pathologies
Anthony Samsel1, Stephanie Seneff2
1 Research Scientist and Consultant, Deerfield, NH 03037, USA
2 Spoken Language Systems Group, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge MA 02139, USA
http://www.surgicalneurologyint.com/article.asp?issn=2152-7806;year=2015;volume=6;issue=1;spage=45;epage=45;aulast=Samsel
Journal of Organic Systems, 9(2) 2014
Genetically engineered crops, glyphosate and the
deterioration of health in the United States of America
Nancy L. Swanson1, Andre Leu2*, Jon Abrahamson3 and Bradley Wallet4
What should be done, and is possibly achievable, is banning use of glyphosphate in the flowering through harvest stages of crop production.
The “only” human gmo food I am aware of is the recently approved “Arctic” apple.
No other gmo foods are approved for direct human consumption
Thank God! An actual reasonable comment. I hope you understand how much I appreciate this.
Off the top of my head, knowing that Roundup is generally applied in two stages (early/late) for weed control, it doesn’t sound like closing the window from flowering to harvest would be difficult at all.
You know the details, how might this impact the use of Roundup as a desiccant for the wheat harvest? This practice is most convenient for the farmers, but has been criticised for leaving residue on the wheat berries.
Gabby
GMO below is correct in the additional approved direct human GMOs. I had forgotten about the Bt trait introduced into sweet corn that kill corn borers. I think they recently approved GMO salmon also.
Glyphosphate is convenient, cheap, and uniforms the wheat crop harvest. I have seen numbers of 85%+ of all the wheat harvested in the US is treated this way now. What is unique about the wheat use is the direct spray material contact with the wheat berry (sugar cane also?) just prior to harvest (7 day limit). The worst that happens by banning fruiting phase use in wheat (or any crop) is reduction of yield and increase in moisture content. During harvest the combine operators will avoid “green” spots in the field. Most grain handling facilities have the ability to further dry the grains they are receiving for storage, so moisture content is not that big a deal. The facility receiving the grain sets an upper limit on the moisture content of the the grain they will accept.
Glyphosphate is used in Roundup Ready GMO crops primarily corn and soybean at any time during the growing season to control weeds. There is no Roundup GMO approved wheat, so weed control in wheat doesn’t happen, except for the escaped trial wheat from the late 90’s.
Gmo sweet corn, papaya, squash, and there is also, field corn varieties used for things like taco shells.
Last week it was vaccines this week gmos what will be popular and wrong next week?
Journal of Interdisciplinary Toxicology
Glyphosphate study 10102-Volume6_Issue_4-01_paper.pdf
The glyphosphate is coming into our food supply from every angle – as a crop drying agent. Wheat, sugar cane, beans, corn – everthing, all crops. The GMO use becomes incidental. Most research does not make this extremely important linkage. GMO in fact may have little to do with the health problems being presented.
Glyphophate is used extensively on every crop, just prior to harvest, leaving very high levels of residue.
Please spread the information from this paper.
It is rarely used as a harvest aid although it is labeled as one. The reason? Number one is it kills to slowly to be effective. Paraquat is much more effective. Secondly, it will not work on roundup ready gmos as the crop would be resistant to the chemical.
This should make you wet! And a money pit for me to dig up!! But as usual no footnotes to check up on. Hmmm… Why is that?? The one I worked on had over 4 pages??
The BfR has finalised its draft report for the re-evaluation of glyphosate
http://www.bfr.bund.de/en/the_bfr_has_finalised_its_draft_report_for_the_re_evaluation_of_glyphosate-188632.html
Glyphosate is used on wheat as a drying agent just before harvest – but just on the wheat that’s not ready to be harvested and the surrounding wheat that gets it just because it’s nearby. Wheat is not considered RoundUp ready.
It is rarely used in that capacity.
Where do you live? Yes, they do use it and wheat isn’t GMO, round-up ready.
Duh, no kidding there isnt any commercial gmo wheat there moron. I live in the midwest and also an ag retailer and can tell you that i have never had a customer kill wheat with roundup. I have had a couple over thirty years use paraquat on soybeans. Im not saying it never happens, but it is extremely rare as almost no good comes from it.
Farmers around me use it that way…I asked them.
Dr. Stephanie Seneff is not an expert in any field related to glyphosate or autism. Her PhD is in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. She has not conducted any original research. Her opinions are not shared by those with PhDs in the relevant fields. In other words, she’s what you’d call a “quack”.
One need not…….have…..a PHD in a field related to glyphosate to put forth an accurate conclusion of the Ill effects of glyphosate…..People wake up and remain so! Agent Orange devastated South Vietnam….Napalm devastated it also…..I saw it first hand. I was there in 1969 with the US Army….Chemicals put forth by big business are good for one thing. To Kill living plants, animals and people….There is a financial profit to them for doing so. End Of Story
If you want to be taken seriously in science, you need expertise equivalent to a PhD. You don’t necessarily need a PhD, but you actually have to demonstrate you know what you’re talking about. Dr Seneff has not demonstrated she has any clue what she’s talking about when it comes to GMOs or glyphosate.
I stand by my above comment. The video she speaks in relates her reading( for the purpose of her paper) of experts who have done research in the lab on the subject of glyphosate and GMO’s….Chemicals, GMO’s, sold for use in ag or war, have one thing and purpose. TO Kill living plants, animals and people…..You just go dig around in South Vietnam. that place is a large area of evil today, It’s just a horror…of dead soil in area’s, humans and animals deformed upon birth, water contaminated to this day…and it’s 40 + years since the US Gov…did this with intent….and you or anyone else who thinks…..well, won’t happen again……The fed gov is capable of doing this to its own population….People have to wake up and I suggest that includes yourself…..And what is your expertise with the subject of this story?
I’m sorry you experienced war, but that has nothing to do with the claim that glyphosate causes autism. I don’t care what Dr. seneff said in her talk. If it’s not peer-reviewed it’s not credible when it comes to science. She’s a quack. Plain and simple.
she did not say, that the projected % of autism in 2025, if it turns out to be that high % in the year 2025, is only caused by glyphosate….and what is your expertise in biology or related area to this mad man’s dash to total US governmental tyranny? “America has been at War 93% of the time…222 out of 239 Years since 1776”
Article on Washington’s Blog, February 23, 2015…..
With all the details…
I have a PhD in biochemistry. That question is about the only think I could understand in your comment. Is English your second language? That’s ok if it is. I’m just having trouble understanding your writing.
Right. And a PHD is on this web site many times a week, blabbing…..NOT
Why don’t you switch sides ….and get a clue. I have witnessed first hand in my life the evil of killer chemicals put forth by big business, put forth for no other reason than to kill life……Not To Save life…..(You are disgusting) …..get a life for yourself before its gone. Life is very short..even 100 yrs for a person is short…..WOW! “clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, here I am stuck in the middle with you” and shills to the left………….in the fork of the road, just back a bit. And If you don’t understand this English…..go take an English course to go with your PHD
I have a very nice life thanks. I’m not going to “switch sides” based on the biased opinions of people who don’t understand this issue. That’s just silly. I enjoy my work, which involves plant genetic engineering.
And I do understand English, just not the jumbled sentences you write. Try some grammar and sentence structure.
your claim to your identity regarding this article is your PHD in biochemistry……then state your name, the university which granted you that and I will think you worthy of speaking as such…..a PHD…..(after I have verified your info from the University)….if you can’t do that then shut the hell up regarding your biochemistry background….
No thanks. I don’t want angry wingnuts like you harassing me. If you don’t like my comments just ignore the.
liking or not liking your comments is not my point! Teach me with your PHD! SHIT .. //// man, go away with your PHD…..my stuff is here on this site and yours?…OH.. Can’ t do that because!!!!!!!!
YOU! All Like You! Who Come To This Site! To Discredit It’s Worthyness…..Need to indentify themselves when doing so….Does not this site, Identify each author, with footnotes to relate to the written article?…..Well….Bozo…you even refuse to identify yourself to me…………..A Nam Vet…..who has endured the horrors often written about on this site….and Just How much of an AmericAN,…(CONSTITUTIONAL BELIEVER ARE YOU?.
Being a Nam Vet means nothing.
Yes it does. Monsanto is known to be a biggest fraud and cover-up in the past hundred years…..
Monsanto is not the same company now. There is no one left from decades ago. Keep it real, argue today’s facts, not the unrelated history.
That’s nonsense, their practice is still a same and only the different is……they got bigger.
I have ignored them, but for you asking me to reply Wingnuts have two sides…. The one side goes to you….And you have as about as much PHD as I do…I do have a BS from a major University in my state………..I wonder if you even have that.
then shut the hell up about your PHD of biochemistry….You don’t got it! W H A T A F R A U D/////and you know it…………….blast off buddy
Seriously, this guy is starting to creep me out.
Yeah, certainly not the type who you want to give your contact info to.
like I said….Steelers Wheel………Stuck in the middle with you…..”jokers to the left of me”
you have shown me nothing………
still blabbing.
Did you eat a lot of acid in the sixties?
A sure sign that a loon feels butthurt from all his wrongness is the sudden turn and leap to some other crackpot theory. What on God’s green Earth does glyphosate have to do with alleged governmental tyrrany? Please try to stay on topic.
SHILL.
And no doubt a “vaccine” pusher.
You make bill gates and the Rothschild’s proud!
Crank magetism in action. Funny how people are never just irresponsible goobers on one subject, they have to buy the entire package.
Fifty dollars sez you think da Jooz were behind 9/11.
He is a SHILL.
Certainly IT is a shill…..I am out to trap the sob in some of his own waste……there are many who do this to this web site…..thinking that somehow they can’t be seen through….All of those types are visable by all the rest of us who come here and are not shills…….good to say hello, today to you.
It. How droll, attempting to reduce your conversation partner to an unperson. That speaks volumes about the personal quality of the woowoo set.
And to crib from Scooby Doo: you would have gotten away with it if it hadn’t been for those meddling scientists.
And you are a SHILL in the pocket of Big Woo. Good day, madam, I said GOOD DAY!
You know what they say, just because the Wright Brothers may have been less than honest in their business dealings does not mean that your magic carpet is actually able to fly.
I use this aphorism because the tactic that you are trying to use is quite common amongst the anti science activist set. You point to some horrible catastrophe that happen forty or sixty or eighty years ago – and it really did happen, and it really was horrible – and then you fling your arm around and point to something in the present while shouting AND THEREFOR THIS HORRIBLE THING IS HAPPENING TODAY! Which is nonsense.
It might be happening today. Yeah. Sure. Maybe. The question always is “IS it happening today?” What is the evidence that it actually is happening today? Screaming “The fed gov is capable of doing this to its own population” and insinuating that I am a horrible person because I am not sufficiently gullible to swallow your little conspiracy theory might make you popular at parties but it does exactly nothing to differentiate between the two possibilities that 1) GMOs are death murdering our children in their beds and 2) GMOs are being unreasonably targeted by people who are frightened of events they can not explain.
Other possibilities are possible, of course.
Now, if you have any credible evidence that GMOs or Roundup or what ever constitute a present danger then bring that evidence forward. That is all that the science types are asking for. If you have it, I am more than ready to be convinced – acceptable of evidence is a large part of the discipline one learns when becoming a scientist. Letting go of treasured beliefs is another large part of that discipline, which allows me to say to you: if you do not have evidence to bring forward, then maybe your treasured beliefs are wrong.
You are OBVIOUSLY a SHILL.You no doubt have ties with the makers of glyphosate and bill gates.
We’ll listen to Dr. Stephanie Seneff, WAY before we listen to your NON-SENSE.
Shill/Troll Alert!
Yes, the Yahoo brigade is working overtime these days. More and more studies showing harm from glyphosate cannot be brushed aside, no matter how desperate the shills owners get.
Why because they don’t agree with you?
Who’s we?
Am I? Based on what evidence? I don’t work for Bill Gates nor a company that makes glyphosate. I have no ties to the agriculture industry. Unfortunately for you, your ad hominem attack is completely hollow. If you want to listen to eneff, that’s your right. But don’t your beliefs to be taken seriously when you are forced to admit that they’re based on the unsubstantiated opinions of a computer scientist.
take your m mouse antics to Hollywood…would you
Want me to respect you for your writings here,..then read my below comments, all of them, and then reply with verifiable information, which I can verify myself…..otherwise I will defend this article and people who think it a reasonable article….I don’t believe people(readers) are asking for perfection from the principals of this article, just honesty!
Considering the patent for Glyphosate expired in the early 2000s, the profit potential is much lower now, and it’s still cheaper than comparable organic herbicides that aren’t nearly as effective. Dr. Seneff has fallen into the trap of correlation=causation, without actually investigating the mechanism for such causation and jumping to a spurious conclusion. Did you know that the number of people who have drowned by falling into a swimming pool correlates tightly with the number of films Nicholas Cage has appeared in a given year? (based on data from 1999-2009)
If anything, a shiller would make far more $ by promoting a premium organic herbicide and appearing to fight the good fight against “bill gates” and “makers of glyphosate”
Then you make a claim above that Skeptologist must be a “vaccine pusher”, when it would be FAR more profitable for pharma companies to promote the anti-vaccine agenda so that more people become dangerously ill requiring advanced treatment (example: treating measles complications can cost around $10,000 per case, while the vaccine to help prevent it costs $19). There’s FAR more profit in treating the disease than preventing it.
Try this one on for size:
.
That is a junk science, that graph doesn’t prove anything, and anyone can make this stuff up on graph.
what is your field of expertise? you have a PhD in which field of study?
I have a PhD in biochemistry and specialize in plant molecular biology.
sure ya do stranger
Ok. Don’t believe me. No sweat off my back.
you haven’t given any reason to believe you. i would think a highly educated person, who studies such subjects as presented in the article, would have a better argument against someones views than, “they don’t even have a Phd in the field they are talking about”.
I looked over Seneff’s article (I wouldn’t even consider it an academic paper) in which she makes this claim about a link between glyphosate and autism. She offers exactly zero evidence demonstrating any such link. She seems to think that a correlation in the rise of autism and the increase in glyphosate use is evidence of a causal association, upon which she then builds this projection. Any scientist worth his or her salt understands the difference between correlation and causation. Yet, here is Seneff seemingly oblivious to this fundamental distinction.
A scientific approach could involve generating a hypothesis based on a correlation and then testing that hypothesis in the lab. But again, Seneff doesn’t engage the scientific method. She has not done any original research to follow up on her speculation. At the very least, she could partner with scientists working in the fields of toxicology or neurology to help test her ideas (since she has no apparent expertise in these fields).
At the end of the day, her claims are not based on empirical evidence but on personal belief. That is what the scientist in me sees. It’s these glaring gaps that lead me to the inevitable conclusion that she’s a quack.
ok. what’s your speculation as to the cause of the increase of autism and similar neurological disorders?
i see similar behavior from monsanto in the personal beliefs of their products.
Have another link, I hope it is to your taste though I think not. This one is from Huffington Post, not known for being against the earth or health. NO STUDY
WAS http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tamar-haspel/condemning-monsanto-with-_b_3162694.htmlDONE.
waiting for all the hundreds of millions of pounds of roundup that gets sprayed every year to biodegrade like monsanto said it would
You didn’t ask, but my speculation is that I do not know. Which is reasonable as i have no particular expertise in that area. I understand that real doctors are hard at work on this issue, and I am prepared to wait until they develop a better understanding.
i didn’t ask huh? let’s take a look at the definition of the word speculation.
spec·u·la·tion/ˌspekyəˈlāSH(ə)n/noun
the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm evidence.
you did no speculation to the question i didn’t ask. my speculation is that we are awash with chemicals, in which certain combinations of chemicals react with each other and can cause health issues. chemicals that mimic hormones and can disrupt the endocrine system of children, many chemicals mimic estrogen and that could be a reason more boys are seen with an autism disorder than girls. waiting for the ‘experts’ to take charge on a pandemic of neurological disorders does not inspire confidence in their expertise.
Not only that, but the curves are basically straight lines. When you are correlating two things on different scales, as long as they are straight lines and have a positive slope, you can make them be as tightly correlated as you want.
And a quack she is, although personally I prefer the term crackpot as quacks are generally incompetent at medicine while Seneff is incompetent at science. She is not a professor at MIT, as some people have been saying she is; she has a degree in electrical engineering and runs computers, which gives her precisely zero expertise in medicine and biology.
The kindest thing a scientist can say about her “work” is that she has dredged up some correlations that might (accent on might) serve as starting points for actual meaningful investigations. By themselves her correlations prove exactly nothing, and in every case a huge amount of work needs to be done to establish or refute a connection to any harmful outcome before anyone can begin to make the sort of claims that Seneff has been hurling about with reckless abandon. Half of our children autistic by 2050, hah!
More accurately, I like to say that Seneff is the biggest fraud in Massachusetts. She found a way to tap into the chthonic undercurrents of woo that percolate through the scientific/intellectual structures of which we are so proud, releasing an army of true believers who have been waiting for a savior to rise up and give them scientific-sounding cover for their dearest occult beliefs.
So one hand washes the other, and another log of “jesus christ, not this nonsense again” gets thrown on the crackpot bonfire. I swear, this may turn out to be every bit as sticky as Seralini. If John Deutch were still Provost, he would have canned her butt months ago for bringing disrepute on the Institute.
Have a link about the Stephanie Seneff and her study.
http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2013/04/30/is_glyphosate_poisoning_everyone.php
still waiting for monsanto to end world hunger
Christ old mighty! ” if you want to be taken seriously in science”……and who in the hell(skeptologist) takes you seriously? On this web site:? This web site takes some of the most terrible hits from your kind due to the I imagine fact, that it exists mostly for people of conscience who desire to learn…..regardless of their age, and so forth…………I have never seen in print where this web site claims it’s superiority over ……………….any thing, any subject, any body of politics, any scientific exploration of a subject and so forth……………you and GMO Roberts and a couple of more are ‘T day and day out to BLAST THE RESPONDERS AND TALKERS AS BEING SOME HOW without a brain……………..DON’t you see? You and yours are the ones……………..”without a brain”
Finally I have taken this personally and will monitor this site and defend it because of this………The site I believe attempts to get to the truthl………………..
I am Robert Beason a NAM vET WHO IS SICK OF what has become of our country in my 70 yrs…I am a combat vet, in country South Viet Nam, 1969…not a phony my service number is this US56639487 and can be verified. And to those who wish to come to this site……..BE honest, Be specific in refute of a written article……..and you will be respected…………….And NO I have No Identity with this web site…….They have no idea I have even written this…………..I am just fed up with the US of A…..And I will speak my mind as long ad I am alive and tell you what I have witnessed a bunch ….and all our citizenry must realize what may happen…and no…am not a nut case eitherr
So if Mickey mouse had an opinion you are in favor of you would support it even though there was on scientific reason for it?
STEALERS WHEEL..Stuck in The Middle With You
“clowns to the left of me,jokers to the right, Here I am, stuck in the middle with you” GMO Roberts, you missed the fork in the road just a little ways back…
shills….to the left
So you don’t actually have anything meaningful to add? That really speaks well for your unfounded position.
you tell me GMO Roberts, just what is my Position?
Obviously you are against the overwhelming mJority of the scientific community.
so now it’s your turn to take a run at me. And No…I respect the scientific community. Thing about that community is, it has two sides. I favor neither side….Ideas from each are to stand upon t heir own merits….
Leaving out the propaganda, ideally, on either side
You tell me something of yourself..Be Honest….Why be a paid proponent for either side? Give me info that I CAN verify of you, myself!, of who you are…..My personal info is right here today on this article…I ask that of others who want their voices to be meaningful, of which, readers, should consider their voices and opinions……………Now I await for your response.
I have never hidden what I do, and still you think I’m paid for writing this? Lol, if you can’t get over that then we really shouldn’t even go on. I am a ag retailer that buys from distributors that buy from chemical companies. Distributors being such as Helena and Crop Production Services. We do not use any Monsanto products outside of their traits in seed, but the seed actually comes from Dow. We sell directly to farmers, so I get to see first hand why gmos are needed and demanded by my customers. iff gmos go away, I will actually sell more products especially insecticides, but they are dangerous for myself, my employees and my customers, and they provided limited protection where gmos provide season long control. I have also seen my customers corn yields skyrocket thanks to gmos.
Alright…good to hear from your own wordsl then why the hell do you come on this we b site for weeks on end to grind for the Big Business People? And this! I am not necessarily against Big Business….per sae….I am not even against Monsanto per sae………..I am against lying stealing purposeful non-disclosure and should I go on….And tell me something of yourself! Please! Should not you be for these same points I just mentioned! Of myself? You know, I THINK. you must consider…………… yourself, yours, family, humanity……and I am sure you have…but somewhere along the way…………..tragedy , perhaps, not wholly implied, has somehow escaped your future vision…..as to befall yourself……..Well. You must tell me more of yourself before I go any further ….(course I don’t expect that to happen) I can tell you mine but you can’t tell me yours……………….as is above…..Isn’t this a world of discord? And believe me you will here from me until I drop commenting on this site, one of the few sites to comment on, on the, entire web….want my name, address and such you can have that also……………..I disbelieve that an on-line identity, hiding, is good for our culture or the world at large, for that matter…so do talk more to me ………….
I commend you for speaking on line this far with your’s and my conversation…Personally , I am 70 yO…from Montana, Farm bkg for all years to 24, college educated, a combat vet, US Army Nam 1969…a self employed person to today, a believer in the freedom of speech………well, I won’t get into the bill of rights………and the US Gov having done to us al(horror)l to this point of my life since 1945…………The Point Is Honesty….And if you are there you have my ear for ever, no matter your ideas…and feel free to address my comments and I welcome your…..s…..
this comment was to go to GMO Roberts and not to this ID
And you are what we refer to as a shill troll.
Ok. So what?
So go vaccinate yourself, the world is overpopulated and we don’t need trolls…
You realize that vaccines help maintain higher populations, don’t you? Of course you don’t. Anti-vaxxers don’t understand facts.
People become “anti-vaxxers” precisely because they understand facts and can separate the shit from the Shinola.
And no, again you have your shit coming out of your mouth instead of your ass; vaccines reduce population. Aside from the sterilization drugs the toxic adjuvants they contain reduce lifespan significantly. Ask your buddy Bill, ya know the one who likely pays your troll toll. He’ll set you straight on that one.
Put down the nutter butter, you’ve had enough.
shill
SHil/
NORTH AMERICANinformal
noun
1.
an accomplice of a hawker, gambler, or swindler who acts as an enthusiastic customer to entice or encourage others.
Exactly what evidence do you have that he works for or with this monolithic industry that is “intent upon destroying the human race”? Facts and evidence convince. Don’t throw around epithets just because you think they make you appear informed.
Accusing someone of being a shill is preferable to putting in the work to construct an argument. Even a very basic one. But what’s really funny is, as you seem to have pointed out, BH doesn’t even know what “shill” means.
Evidence: Skeptologist is a liar that he has a PHD.(that’s evidence)…let him post his name, graduate school from which he/she received the PHD, and I will check on line and apologize if I am incorrect…..You see, the lady in the video has every thing out there for all to see….this guy has nothing and hiding behind a made up on line identity…………and who the hell are you backing him up?
If you’re willing to apologize online and need to “check”, then you’re not making a statement of fact. You’re stating an assumption (not evidence). I’m not backing anyone up. I’m saying that only facts and evidence should compel, not assumptions and conjecture. You have no reason to believe he isn’t telling the truth until evidence indicates that he is not.
Damn right I need to check……..one does not go around in this world claiming a PHD….without people checking…..That’s a fact….
lol. Yeah, ok, you’re missing the point entirely. UNTIL you check, your assumptions are not fact. So saying he’s a liar is not evidence. How is this so difficult for you to comprehend? Just turn off your computer. I think a Speak & Spell is more your speed, pal.
you know better than that….Just another phony, speaking shxx for those who are asleep….not to realize the difference………Want to impress me! Tell me of yourself….that I can verify….my ID above is verifiable….
No.
of course not. That’s how it goes in this our day, United States of America…………and you think this Skeptologist (IT) is going to be up front responsible for (IT’s) own words………….well of course you don’t think that………You people and all like you, go crawl in your holes cause not one of you well be worth contacting if the SHTF….Personally, I do not know or not know if it will………….But tell you what if it does….you guys are loosers….and I hope it does not hit the fan………….NO People Are Deserving Of That To Befall Upon Them…..Americans included in that sentence… Perhaps you personally have learned something via my conversation with you….I will have no way of knowing, though.
Yeah, why don’t I publicly disclose my identity and contact information so the crazy Vietnam vet truth activist can see exactly where I live. No thanks.
NO Wrong…I personally am not an activist…never have been although I graduated from the U of M Montana 1967…and went through all that which today’s protests hardly compare to, especially the numbers of attendees to protests compared to then….nor am I a violent person….I endured during being in Nam so that I might survive….It was, go in or go to jail for refusing the draft…..That is not here today now is it! And people better wake up to what this US Gov is capable of doing to our own neighbors….in our own towns…
I get so sick of phony’s. I was drafted into Nam, 1968 by the US Army,,,,in country 1969, combat and survived….I have been put upon by agent orange, also, the Napalm used was a disaster there, and all by intent by our lovely Fascist government and that has been nearly 50 years ago……..and here is who I am Robert Beason USA Nam 1969 US56639487………and I am not hiding behind a damn thing…my family has been in the US since the 1600’s as have so many other family names in our country…..and people want to speak to each other on the net………….and what do they do?….Most hide. Most fade away, from their reality they put out of themselves……………That’s what I am telling you in the above comment…and who are you?
I suspect both you and this PHD IT will fade away rather than to come forward with specifics of reality other than a made up on-line ID of themselves….to cover for the reality of themselves…. how about it? Are you out there? Or are you hiding:
That’s great that you are a vet, but it does not give you license to go around abusing people.
In all seriousness, your behavior is so bizarre that skeptologist is not only justified but wise to keep all personally identifying information private. America is filled with nuts who are angry and have guns, and sometimes they run off to shoot people.
Go vaccinate yourself, the world is overpopulated and we don’t need trolls…
Insults from the likes of you are badges of honor.
It doesn’t take rocket science to figure it that these GMOs and ROUNDUP are causing gastrointestinal problems, infertility in farm animals and women. Are you aware David Rockefeller has spent millions of dollars for Eugenic program for human population control in GMO foods? Dumb Dumb, yourself is a quack.
It doesn’t take rocket science to figure this “Glyphosate” is causing health issues in animals and humans. Lol!
I never said glyphosate wasn’t causing problems. I agree it may be. But figuring out what health impacts glyphosate is having does take competent scientists. Seneff is not competent in any relevant fields.
O.K.