Print Friendly and PDF

UN, Bill Gates Foundation Push Deadly HPV Shots on Poor Nations Under ‘GAVI Alliance’

Anthony Gucciardi
November 18th, 2011
Updated 11/08/2012 at 7:49 pm
Pin It

vaccineneed3 210x131 UN, Bill Gates Foundation Push Deadly HPV Shots on Poor Nations Under GAVI Alliance

A new campaign has been launched by an organization known as the GAVI Alliance to vaccinate up to 2 million women and girls with either GlaxoSmithKline’s Cervarix or Merck’s Gardasil by the year 2015. Of course these two HPV shots have been shown to be very dangerous, with Gardasil linked to death, countless adverse reactions, and Cervarix recently outed as similarly threatening.

Nine countries are candidates for the HPV vaccine campaign, though they are not listed at this time. In addition, the price of the campaign is not being disclosed due to the “sensitive nature” of the price talks.

Why would an organization supposedly dedicated to enhancing health worldwide push either HPV shot on up to 2 million women and young girls? Considering HPV results in only 1% of cancers, and has a 90% chance to resolve itself within two years, it does not seem worth the dangerous side effects and countless millions that will be spent on the upcoming campaign.

GAVI Alliance Funded by UN, Vaccine Industry, Monsanto Investor Bill Gates

The GAVI Alliance, a name relatively unknown to many, is a Geneva-based public-private partnership set up in the year 2000 with financial backing from organizations such as the World Bank, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the vaccine industry, UNICEF, and many other unidentified philanthropists. It is important to note that a public-private partnership is a government and private industry merger or partnership, meaning that these corporate interests can intertwine with big government.

Now known as the GAVI Alliance, the public-private partnership was previously known as the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation. Thanks to a $750 million dollar commitment from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI launched its initiative to vaccinate millions of individuals worldwide. Of course the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation also currently holds 500,000 shares of Monsanto, the bloated biotech company responsible for genetically modifying the food supply and creating mutated insect populations through the use of heavily altered biopesticides.

It was also the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation that funded the release of genetically modified mosquitoes, which were actually released into the environment back in 2010 for testing purposes.

Bill Gates has personally given an extremely controversial TED talk, in which he states:

“The world today has 6.8 billion people… that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”

Skeptics argue that Gates could not have been talking about vaccine-induced deaths, though Gates clearly does not stutter or correct himself after making the statement. Watch the video of the TED talk below and decide for yourself:

Before potentially calling for a reduction in world population through vaccination and healthcare, Gates speaks on the phony the issue of CO2 emissions and its effects on climate change. He presents a formula for tracking CO2 emissions as follows: CO2 = P x S x E x C.

P = People
S = Services per person
E = Energy per service
C = CO2 per energy unit

Gates then states that “probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero.” The audience laughs as Gates jokingly alludes to the human population being reduced to near zero.

Even more concerning is the link between GAVI and the vaccine industry. In the past Merck has used bribery and other forms of corruption to push Gardasil on patients through government legislation and policy. In fact, it was revealed that Merck paid key legislators to pass the Gardasil bill that would enable the state to administer Gardasil to girls as young as 12 without parental permissions.

Without much surprise, the bill ended up passing and being signed into law. The sales boost that Merck will receive from this law is not yet known, however Merck’s profits have recently exploded due in part to the skyrocketing sales of Gardasil. Merck may also manage to establish Gardasil as the primary HPV shot used in the GAVI alliance campaign, which would generate them countless millions.

Governments, World Bank to Help Pay for Deadly HPV Shots

Merck is offering GAVI a deep discount on Gardasil, down to $5 per vaccine from $15 per three-dose course. While this may seem thoughtful, as GAVI appears to make 0 profit from their ‘generous’ act of dishing out the deadly Gardasil vaccine on poor nations, Merck stands to make a substantial profit.

Thanks to a GAVI co-financing policy, recipient countries are required to contribute toward the cost of the vaccines. This guarantees that not only Merck, but Gavi as well, will receive considerable amounts of cash from the 9 unknown countries in which the HPV shots are being administered. Furthermore, the UN World Bank is actually issuing bonds to fund the HPV shot campaign.

The International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) is an organization integral in the funding of the campaign. Created to accelerate funding for vaccination campaigns, the IFFIm generates funds through the issuing of bonds in the capital markets, using long-term government pledges as a guarantee to pay back interest. Since it launched in 2006, the IIFIm has raised more than $3 billion by tapping into capital markets. This has doubled the funds available for GAVI’s immunization programs.

Shockingly, GAVI’s Tax Form 990 for 2009 shows that GAVI has net assets of  $2.5 billion — ($2,505,336,042 -page 1).

Not only is the IFFIm generating billions in cash from governments, but Merck or GlaxoSmithKline may soon be getting a chunk of it for the HPV shot campaign. The IFFIm is funded by France, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom and Australia. All of this information is available through GAVI fact sheets, available on their website.

Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank lead-managed bonds

In a 2007 article on the World Bank’s website, it was revealed that the International Finance Facility for Immunisation hoped to raise $4 billion over the next 10 years to fund the vaccination of 500 million children. Among the first buyers were the Pope, the Archbishop of Canterbury, and three other British religious leaders at the IFFIm’s launch event in London.

Other investors included North American investors (35%), UK investors (12%), Swiss investors (8%), and investors in the rest of Europe (21%). The remainder was placed with investors in the Middle East and Asia, according to the IFFIm. Interestingly enough, Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank lead-managed the inaugural bond issue.

Notes were also placed with North American investors (35 percent), UK investors (12 percent), Swiss investors (8 percent) and investors in the rest of Europe (21 percent). The remainder was placed with investors in the Middle East and Asia, according to IFFIm, the World Bank, Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank; the latter two lead-managed the inaugural bond issue.

EU Legally Bound to Pay Over 20 years

The article also mentions that the bonds will be repaid over 20 years by the UK, France, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Norway under the terms of ‘legally binding’ agreements.

The report states :

It’s a good way to fund immunization programs because the benefits—lives saved—are realized more quickly as future donor contributions are used to provide funding now, she says.

Millions Spent from Drained Governments to Push Deadly HPV Shots

As women take legal action against Merck for Gardasil-induced abortions and severe side effects, it seems quite outlandish for GAVI to launch a global HPV shot initiative. The HPV shot led to 3,589 harmful reactions and 16 deaths between May 2009 and September 2010 alone. Of the 3,589 adverse reactions, many were debilitating. Permanent disability was the result of 213 cases; 25 resulted in the diagnosis of Guillain-Barre Syndrome; there were 789 other “serious” reports according to FDA documents.

It was also revealed that the FDA was hiding 26 additional Gardasil deaths until Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information act on the information.

Organizations and governments around the globe should be banning Gardasil, not unleashing it on poor countries. It seems that GAVI, a multi-billion dollar merger of government and corporation, is not truly interested in improving the health of 3rd world inhabitants.

About Anthony Gucciardi:
1.thumbnail UN, Bill Gates Foundation Push Deadly HPV Shots on Poor Nations Under GAVI AllianceGoogle Plus ProfileAnthony is the Editor of NaturalSociety whose work has been read by millions worldwide and is routinely featured on major alternative and mainstream news website alike, including the powerful Drudge Report, NaturalNews, Daily Mail, and many others. Anthony has appeared on programs like Russia Today (RT), Savage Nation, The Alex Jones Show, Coast to Coast AM, and many others. Anthony is also dedicated to aiding various non-profit organizations focused around health and rehabilitation as well as the creator of the independent political website Storyleak

From around the web:

  • Wake Up

    Let me get this straight for all the sheep, Bill Gates is WELL KNOWN for his eugenics agendas (population reduction for the laypersons ) and you really think he is trying to help an already over populated society when he has openly admitted populations need to be reduced? What’s wrong with this picture? Also, to the girl that took the gardasil shots, it sterilizes thousands so when you do finally decide to have children I want you to think back at your conversation here and remember you were informed you just decided to be closed minded. It, on record kills thousands and has been banned in many countries and don’t forget your eugenics buddy (BILL Gates) is a big supporter of this shot……how’s that adding 2 + 2 going for you now??

  • sewe

    nice comments ….

    As a biology student I always find the whole vaccine hysteria so infuriating. There's no connection between this vaccine and adverse reactions. Vaccines don't create resistant strains, they train the body to fight off infection it's not the same as india its not seen enymore, thisnot reported anywhere, ithing the us goverment repoted that…any way thanks for giving the idea about Human-Papillomavirus-HPV

  • Godofredo



    From its inception until the appearance of tha uterine carcinoma of the cervix (UCC) take in average 25 to 30 years; the investigation on the vaccine against the human papilloma virus has begun the 2000; the scientific efficacy of this vaccine has just determined in the years 2025-2030

    HPV not causes definitely the (UCC); in the onset of this disease are involve multiple risk factors, including suspected HPV, but there are security for epidemiology and statistics that sex generates the disease. Mix in 130.000 nuns not found not any UCC.

    To accept that a virus or bacteria cause a disease must indefectible fulfill the 5 Koch postulates:
    1. The agent must be present in each case of the disease and absent in healthy subjects.

    2. The agent should not appear in other diseses,

    3. The agent must be isolated in pure culture from the lesions of the diseases,

    4. The agent has to cause the disease in an animal capable of being incoculated,

    5. The agent must be newly in the lesions of animal in experimentation
    Consequently HPV do not fulfill not any of Koch's postulate; fulfill this postulate is accepted as dogma in medicine, scientifically we can sure that the HPV is not the

    causative agent of the UCC

    Until June 2012 solely in USA was 263, 328 advers efffects, disabling irreversible 8,860, death 1160, abnormal PAP 4900, dysplasia cervical 1950, cervical cancer 560.!… .

    To accord of Vaccine advers effects reaction (VAERS) information that is denounced

    solely between 1% to 10%

    Dr. Harper, who helped develop the vaccine for Merck reports that the vaccine was not investigated in children under 15 years and the vaccine given to children under 11 years is a big public experiment.
    The vaccine was approved to give girls not contaminated with HPV; Dr.Howenstinc say if women are vaccinated contaminated with HPV are able to acquire a 44.6% CCU / Howenstine/james170.htm.

    This vaccine is transgenic; the Sane vax has discover that Gardasil is contaminated with DNA recombinant (DNArPVH) and has raised its concern to the president of the FDA Margaret Hamburg; the FDA replied that its presence does not cause any harm.

    A vaccinated girl became ill with rheumatoid arthritis, which is an autoimmune disease. 24 hours after vaccination and found that the DNArPVH adhered to aluminum, two years after vaccination.
    To introduce the vaccine are using the marketing of fear:

    HPV is ubiquitous and lives in wild and domestic animals, we pollute from birth, is on the doorknobs, on towels, on the nails, on fomites, in gloves and specula of gynecologists; sexual intercourse is not the solely means of contamination.
    HPV also lives in the 400 nm outermost of our skin and mucous membranes. ,

    If live on our skin, our immune system produces cellular and humoral immunity; our body is naturally being vaccinated for HPV to live on our skin and mucous ..
    The cervical carcinoma, neither the HPV are infections, contagious, epidemical, nor infectd only by the coitus

    Gardasil is genetically modified;; known vaccines are made from killed or attenuated original bacterial or virus; it is UNKNOWN damage that produce in the future and is prepared to prevent infection only of HPVs 16 and 18; it is know that exist 200 species of HPV.

    The HPVs are not distributed uniformly over the world. It was found that in Canada the HPV 18 solely less than 3%, more prevalent is HPV 31, in my country Peru there are no studies that established the predominant types of HPV, gardasiul contains 225 mcg and cervarix 500 mcg aluminum that produce Alzheimer's, it is a mayor neurotoxine, disrupter of neurological funtion and immunoexcitotoxicity and polisorbato 80 which is a potent contraceptive that in the experimental animals produces sterility, atrophy of the testicles and funtional and morphological disturbance of the reproductive organs; are carcinogenic and mutagenic; also contains sodium borate considered poison, not used in medicinal preparations.

    Until now it is know 200 types og PVHs

    December 2012 FDA approved the gradasil to boys since 9 to 26 years to prevent the anal cancer and wart. It is a excess.
    For the reasons from Peru, depth, Huancayo, I believe that this vaccine is a Fraud?, Robbery?, Swindle?, Rough Joke?; it is not scientifically proven at this time, its effectiveness will be verified just the years of 2025-2030.

    Dr. Godfrey Arauzo

    E mail:

  • Anonymous

    This information is entirely subjective and not supported by scientific data. The safety risks of vaccines are rare when compared to those of having disease and additionally the lack of means to prevent disease.

  • christy

    One last thing. To the author, I think you are taking Bill Gates' comments way out of context. It's been a platform of the United Nations and other international health organizations to make birth control available to women in developing nations for decades now. This is nothing new, and it shouldn't come as a surprise. You can read for yourself on many of these organizations' websites.

    You have to ask yourself, how many deaths can the HPV vaccine be causing for it still not to be public knowledge? Compared to the rate at which birth control can bring down unwanted pregnancy? If you actually had all the numbers written out I think you would realize that it is ridiculous to suggest that "vaccine deaths" are any kind of public policy.

  • christy

    My comment is probably going to get deleted, but for what it's worth, I would like to put my two cents in.

    In the interest of full disclosure, I chose to receive the Gardasil vaccine 5 years ago, and I am completely fine. I never experienced any side effects.

    I chose to receive it because I felt that the risk of contracting one of the strains of HPV that can lead to cervical cancer was significantly higher than the risk of a bad reaction to the vaccine. I am in my mid-twenties and I have two friends my age who have contracted relatively risky forms of HPV. They were told to have pelvic exams every 6 months indefinitely to make sure no cancer was developing.

    (There are multiple strands of HPV. Some of them never cause any symptoms, and go away on their own. Some of them can lead to cervical cancer and possibly death).

    I am not going to claim that all vaccines are 100% safe for everyone. I am also not going to defend Monsanto. But I would like to urge everyone to consider both sides of the issue and try to do more research before panicking. The truth is that vaccines do play a valuable role in promoting our health, and that is why many infectious diseases that killed and maimed people (especially children) only 100 years ago have been eradicated. (Smallpox, TB, polio). The vaccines for these diseases have been around for decades and by now we would know if they were dangerous.

    Best wishes, everyone.

    • Anonymous

      Christy: I think your comment is very well put. One correction however. There is no vaccine for TB. In fact this disease is still active and treatment is difficult because the strains are now more virulent than ever..

    • Joe

      Nice to see there's people like you commenting on these sites :D

      As a maths and biology student I always find the whole vaccine hysteria so infuriating. There's no link between this vaccine and adverse reactions. Vaccines don't create resistant strains, they train the body to fight off infection it's not the same as antibiotics.

      The whole vaccine hysteria only seems to happen in the US too, there does seem to be a major failure in science education in the states.

      • Janet McBride

        I am living in a developing country where cervical cancer is the biggest cancer killer of women – and children still die of diseases which are prevented by vaccination in richer countries. Bringing HPV vaccines here is seen as a positive step, and is much more affordable than treating cervical cancer, and less heartbreaking than having your mother,sister, daughter, friend or self die quite horribly of this disease.

        HPV is implicated in other cancers, including penile cancer, so men (and partners) against this vaccine should perhaps consider how they would like surgical treatment, or death, for that.

        But sorry to the student, vaccines do have side effects – most, including these two, can cause a sore arm and cold/flu symptoms in some recipients – on the up side, the stronger the reaction, the better protection an individual is likely to have. There is always the chance someone will be allergic to a vaccine – my father had an anaphylactic reaction after eating mushrooms but there is no ban on mushrooms subsequent to that!

        Deaths reported in relation to the HPV vaccines include motor vehicle accidents and other trauma. If a new medication or vaccine is being studied or introduced there is a requirement that all adverse reactions, whether or not considered related to the drug/vaccine, be reported. The incidence is compared to the problem in the broader community and analysis is done to see if (for example thyroid disease) rates are any different in recipients and non-recipients. These vaccines are considered safe and effective.

        Those who have the luxury of high quality care options should think some more about the damage they can do with their ill-informed inflammatory remarks.

        A separate comment about those who think our children receive too many vaccines – the first time they chomp a mouthful of dirt, chew the rail of a supermarket trolley or get kissed but a room of adoring adults, they are exposed to more challenges to their immune system than in a lifetime of vaccines.

  • Ernie Mink

    I love Windows and Microsoft. I cannot say I support or agree with all philanthropy such as vaccines. I know that vaccines can be very bad and have actually led to other sicknesses and death.

  • Elaborate Haggard

    I smell the foul wind of Agenda 21 blowing! Again!

    (A gender to one… world dominance)

  • Stephanie

    GREAT article!

  • Stephanie

    Thank you for wrting such a GREAT article on this subject. You filled in some gaps for me regarding this issue.

  • Sharon

    I would like to know what makes Bill Gates an expert on CO2 emissions other than the fact that he has an endless pool of cash and can buy his way into any Elite Enforcers Group. If Microsoft is a reflection of the type of planning and thoroughness that goes into the Rules and Regulations to decrease our Carbon footprint, get ready for all kinds of half assed science that will be cited to justify the reduction of convienience in our daily lives.

    Microsoft releases software that has bugs in it and there are always apps problems. Bill Gates involved with CO2 Emissions, will call for austere measures that will in no way reduce CO2, but rather make our lives miserable and increase the profits of corporations.

    I wish Bill would do the world a favor, build a Space Ship and colonize a new planet to create his 4th Reich and leave planet earth in peace.

  • Dale

    Spending millions to give HPV shots to girls that can potentially kill them. Great work, GAVI!


  • Yates

    Bill and Melinda Gates foundation is behind ONLY the most corrupt organizations. Amazing investigative piece.

  • T BAGG

    And of course our beloved Congress passes a law for Big Pharma where you can't sue against vaccine manufacturers. Gee…I wonder if they are doing this on purpose? Trying to make women who are poor and not in the Satanic circle zionest jew club lovers infertile? It's a damn good thing I'm not a Conspiracy Theorist! I got to see the finale of DWTS tonight! And then I'm going to Starbucks! And then I'm going to buy the new iphone! And then I'm going to watch Fox news because it is fair and balanced!

  • T BAGG

    HPV, could cause cervical cancer. I believe this is a herpes virus correct? And jabbing little girls with this "vaccine" is unsafe and has led to death. Umm…I would rather risk having sex with a dude with herpes if I were a girl than risk possible death right now. And of course, this vaccine is so new, that there is no guarantee that it will work anyway.

    If I were a conspiracy theorist, I'd say that the Gates Foundation actually wants to kill poor little girls and cull the population. Well, then I say, "Way to go Billy!" There are too many useful eaters anyway and our Satanic lord hates poverty! Jesus returns 2012…you heard it here first!

    • Ginny

      HPV is not herpes, it is a simple virus that usually clears up completely and goes away without treatment. Avoiding early sexual activiy is the solution to avoiding it. Having good nutrition and healthy lifestyle is all we need. Bill gates and monsanto want to keep us from having a normal healthy balanced diet too, as the create genetically modified seeds producing foods we are allergic to and kills off the bee population, as well as cross pollinates with normal crops on farms all over the place, ruining the entire area's food sources.

      they are totally evil.

    • Janet McBride


      HPV is Human Papillomavirus, not herpes. The vaccine does not kill little girls but cervical cancer does. And don't joke about Herpes either, it makes you miserable and is a danger to babies if the mother has it as they are being born.