Top Scientist: Fluoride Already Shown to Cause 10,000 Cancer Deaths
Water fluoridation is a highly controversial topic, with many individuals voicing massive concern over the practice. In contrast, some stick to the concept that there isn’t any association between fluoride and any real negative effects. Fluoride, however, is indeed a toxic substance, and has been tied with numerous health complications in well-established research. Fluoride can be found in many water supplies, toothpaste, and even food at alarming levels. While it may sound shocking to many, some research is even drawing a close connection between fluoride and an increased cancer risk.
The Dangers of Fluroide
One paper entitled Fluoride – A Modern Toxic Waste says the following:
Yiamouyiannis documents research showing that fluoride increases the tumor growth rate by 25% at only 1 ppm, produces melanotic tumors, transforms normal cells into cancer cells and increases the carcinogenesis of other chemicals. For the original references to these studies, refer to Yiamouyiannis’ pamphlet, Lifesavers Guide to Fluoridation.
In 1977, it was shown that fluoridation caused about 10,000 cancer deaths in epidemiological studies by Dr. Dean Burk, former head of the Cytochemistry Section at the National Cancer Institute and Yiamouyiannis. Despite the findings occurring in 1977, they were not reluctantly released until 1989. After analyzing the study results in rats, it was found that animals who drank fluoridated water:
- Showed an increase in tumors and cancers in oral squamous cells.
- Developed a rare form of bone cancer called osteosarcoma.
- Showed an increased in thyroid follicular cell tumors.
- Developed a rare form of liver cancer known as hepatocholangiocarcinoma.
To reduce fluoride levels to a the greatest degree, activists must demand that the government stop fluoridating the water supplies. Water fluoridation has not only been linked to an increased cancer risk, but a decreased IQ in children. In fact, the findings forced the government to call for lower fluoridation levels nationwide. Until water fluoridation comes to a halt, the easiest way to reduce fluoride exposure is to invest in a reverse osmosis water filtration system. Drinking distilled water for 3-6 months may also reduce the soft tissue fluoride levels, but not bone levels. Soft tissue fluoride levels cause the greatest health problems.
|
| Mike is the co-founder, editor, and researcher behind Natural Society. Studying the work of top natural health activists, and writing special reports for top 10 alternative health websites, Mike has written hundreds of articles and pages on how to obtain optimum wellness through natural health. |
Nice way to dumb down the populace and keep them where they are wanted. I’ve heard a few “Conspiracy Theories” in regards to dumbing down but never the use of flouride. Makes me suspicious though. Dumbing is not a word according to the dictionary, but it is the term widely used by theorists and politicians (one would wonder why politicians discuss this subject). Recently I have lost a few family members and friends to inexplicably fast growing cancers particularly skeletal tumors and lesions. I really hate the thought that we have unwittingly been poisoning ourselves by ingesting what is termed safe drinking water. It would be especially advantageous to us all if more in depth studies are conducted ASAP to determine the truth and bring about immediate change and also serious ramifications for those involved in conspiracy and corruption at political and corporate levels. I’m going to buy some bottled water now and will seriously be considering a filter. If this seems to be a heap of yada yada, I apologise. Please make an exception for one who has consumed vast quantities of flouride, and I’ll try harder next time.
Quackwatch is used to denigrate any scientist, doctor or professional who doesn’t agree with the Establishment viewpoint of what medicine or health is supposed to be. In short, if you can point out their crimes, they’ll put you on Quackwatch.
The evidence is conclusive. The enemy or obstacle here is a eugenics-based government who won’t take no for an answer.
While fluoride has been demonstrated to thicken bones and teeth, it’s also been show to leave them more brittle.
wow.. you said it all.. you are the reason I don’t trust and will never trust Dentist’s and Doctor’s. You would think that after gaining a degree you would have some kind of knowledge! Thanks for confirming my thoughts!
As it may be good for your teeth, that isnt what were talking about. We are talking about the safety of it when consumed.
I really hope that all of you are joking…I’ve been a practicing oral surgeon for 15 years, and prior to that I was a General Practitioner for 5. Me and almost all of my colleagues have noticed a significant difference in the strength of the tooth enamel from kids who live in Windsor (My town which still activly fluorises water) and Leamington (A community which has banned fluorisation). That being said, I know dentists who love practicing in Leamington, because they’ve been filling a heck of a lot more cavities in the teeth poor Mexican laborers & their kids (people who most likely don’t have access to basic oral hygeine supplies)!
It's really nice information provided by you. Nice topics and nice information. Thanks for sharing this with us.
Why people still use to read news papers when in this technological world everything is
accessible on net?
I am not sure where you are getting your info, but good topic.
I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more.
Thanks for fantastic information I was looking for this info for my mission.
Thanks for this information, you mean the toothpaste brand having a flouride content is dangerous.
This is very useful information, and I really appreciate you for sharing this one, very impressive indeed, thanks for the good insight here and keep posting more.
Excellent article. Keep posting such kind of information on your site.
Im really impressed by it.
Hi there, You’ve performed an incredible job. I’ll certainly digg it and personally recommend to my
friends. I’m sure they will be benefited from this web site. auto insurance in florida requirements – grow African American hair – cheap auto insurance companies in michigan
now of course i guess we should help ourselves not to get cancer and eat more fruits and vegetables. That's what we can do these days. how to get oil out of concrete
Water fluoridation indeed a controversial topic and thanks for specifying that topic more nicely. Clean water for drinking is very crucial issues nowadays. Peoples are using various ways to purify water for drinking and some of those ways are leading to deadly ending of human lives. I hope by reading this post they'll be aware and try to to use solid water purifying ways. Thanks.
I am so glad that this top scientist fluoride that are already shown to cause the 10000 cancer deaths… At least we can help them with it.
Thanks, dentist in Sandy Utah
I think this is among the most vital info for me. And i am glad reading your article.
But should remark on few general things, The website style is great,
the articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers
You would think in today's technically advanced medical world that we could put an end to all the controversy surrounding fluoride and it's health risk. Until we have conclusive evidence either way that fluoride is healthy or unhealthy, unfortunately this debate will never end. I know fluoride has been used for years and I'm a firm believer in moderation. Anything in high doses or extreme amounts is usually toxic. On the flip side, if it's not offering hugely noticeable benefits, then why use it? Maybe one day we will find the answer?
Hey there! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a team of volunteers and starting a new project in a community in the same niche.
Your blog provided us beneficial information to work on. You have done a
outstanding job!
Great article! I love discovering new album releases!
The evidence is clear, so why doesn't anyone do anything about it? Has greed and power blinded officials so much that they couldn't care less how safe the public water supply is?
Have a look at this link (quite interesting): hvrd.me/XSZVih
It's possible that the toxicity can also affect your brain productivity…. And I am very sure that drinking water can be sterilized without fluoride….
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/features/feature… (hopefully clickable link)
Any thoughts on this?
http://www.quackwatch.org/11Ind/yiamouyiannis.htm…
inconclusive. he should have went thru a detox first, but did he?
i don't think so.
10 Facts about Water Fluoridation Everyone Should Know
Bottle-fed infants receive the highest doses of fluoride as they rely solely on liquids for food, combined with their small size. A baby being fed formula receives approximately 175 times more fluoride than a breast-fed infant
There is not a single process in your body that requires fluoride
A multi-million dollar U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) -funded study found no relation between tooth decay and the amount of fluoride ingested by children
Water fluoridation cannot prevent the oral health crises that results from inadequate nutrition and lack of access to dental care
Water fluoridation is a violation of your individual right to informed consent to medication
Forty-one percent of all American children aged 12-15 are now impacted by dental fluorosis (damage to the enamel).
The chemicals used to fluoridate water supplies are largely hazardous by-products of the fertilizer industry and have never been required to undergo randomized clinical trials for safety or effectiveness by any regulatory agency in the world
The U.S. FDA classifies fluoride as an "unapproved drug"
Ingesting fluoride has been found to damage soft tissues (brain, kidneys, and endocrine system), as well as teeth (dental fluorosis) and bones (skeletal fluorosis). There are also 24 studies demonstrating a strong relationship between fairly modest exposure to fluoride and reduced IQ in children
Fluoridation discriminates against those with low incomes. People on low incomes are least able to afford avoidance measures, such as reverse osmosis filters or bottled water
"In 1997, it was shown that fluoridation caused about 10,000 cancer deaths in epidemiological …
…
Despite the findings occurring in 1997, they were not reluctantly released until 1989."
Shouldn't that first and second date be 1977… I believe that's when the study was completed!
Otherwise, how can the info be released B4 it was known (1989)?
Somehow, someway, it will get into your system, Beer, soda, coffee, etc. all the manufactures add water to the drinks but were does the water they add come from?
10,000 deaths? Is that all? Well, I do declare that's a trifling amount, considering the people who originally put the fluoride in our drinking and cooking water actually put it there to kill many more.
Give it time, as I'm certain the dumbed down people of USA either don't give a hoot, or, they do but have not the balls to do something about it….right?
One year ago, the City of Fairbanks, Alaska stopped fluoridation after 60 years. Learn how it was done here:
http://www.fluoridefreefairbanks.org
Politicians do not care about anything other than their pocket book. They don't care that you are dying from the fluoride, from all the other chemicals in food and environment which should not be there. They care so little about human life that they lie in order to bomb foreign countries too. They will be found out. he who searches hearts and minds will repay. Vengeance is Mine says the Lord.
It goes beyond politicians. It is big corporations (too big to fail) that own us and own too many politicians. They are filled with greed. Nothing matters but profits. When a candidate asks for our support, we should reply: "Will you do something about the big corporations that have taken over our country? Do you know that the FDA is in bed with the biggest ones?"
Here is my question. Has Florided been investigated in so far as the amost epidemic rate of Autism in America? Most of the kids in the generation involved have been raised with this poison added to their water supply. Seems to me there could very well be some correlation.
"Fluoride appears to have the potential to initiate or promote cancers, particularly of the bone…," according to the most recent and extensive review of fluoride toxicology by the prestigious National Research Council (2006)
Bassin et al. (2006) reported in Cancer Causes and Control that fluoride exposure is linked to an increased risk of osteosarcoma in boys and young men.
In 1990 the National Toxicology Program (NTP) reported an increase in osteosarcoma in male rats exposed to fluoride, an increased risk for liver and oral cancers, and an increase in thyroid follicular cell tumors.
Among human studies, Hoover et al. (1991) found a 79% increase in osteosarcoma in males under 20 years old in fluoridated counties, compared to a 4% decrease in non-fluoridated counties over time.
Cohn (1992) similarly reported an increased risk for osteosarcoma in males under age 20 living in fluoridated versus non-fluoridated counties.
Also, the NRC recommends further research be conducted on the effects of fluoride on the risk of bladder cancer.
In addition, the most commonly used fluoridation chemicals (silicofluorides) have been linked with increased levels of lead in children's blood. EPA considers lead to be a probable human carcinogen
Ramesh and colleagues propose that high fluoride bone content might have been one of the major factors causing osteosarcoma in people living in India where water supplies are often high in natural fluoride (J Env Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology, 2001)
In 6/2001 "Journal of Epidemiology," Takahashi et al. write, "The likelihood of fluoride acting as
a genetic cause of cancer requires consideration."
Biological Trace Element Research (4/2009)reports blood fluoride levels were significantly higher in osteosarcoma patients than in control groups
More about fluoride and cancer http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/cancer/index….
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-study…