32 Comments

  1. blank Undecider says:

    Sounds like it’s working as intended.

  2. blank RhettButler1 says:

    If this is all true, why don’t we hear something from some of the excellent agricultural based universities in our country?

    1. blank Kevin Folta says:

      I’ll chime in on that, as a public, independent scientist. The reason is, because we are expected to publish real science in higher-impact journals. Feeding rats two completely different diets, one containing 30% soybeans (that we know contain phytoestrogens and other bioactives) for 90 days and then showing that the mice are different than those eating wheat, is no big surprise. It is in an irrelevant journal that only Sarich would consider meaningful, as she never met a bad study she didn’t like.

    2. blank Canadian_Skeptic says:

      You can. Just go to Google Scholar and enter search terms relevant to the issue you want to know more about. Then look for articles in credible journals (preferably with in impact factor of 2 or higher).

  3. I am not a Physician, but was given Medical Power Of Attorney of an individual this past year. I asked only one question to first Dr. That I was introduced too, “Does he or any other Practicioner associated, employed or contracted with the hospital system and addressing the CAUSE of the Patient I am RESPONSIBLE FOR, Involve themselves with ” DETOXIFICATION OF THE PATIENTS BLOOD STREAM? RESPONSE: “WE CAN’T DO THAT.” MY RESPONSE: CAN’T IS NOT IN MY VOCABULARY, YOU WILL NOTIFY ALL LEGAL, MANAGEMENT, MEDICAL, EMPLOYEES, & ANY SUBSTITUTE, SITIN, OR REPLACEMENT, THAT ALL WILL LOSE THEIR LICENSE TO PRACTICE, BE SUED FOR MAL-PRACTICE, RESULTING IN A FELONY RECORD, AND NEVER PRACTICE IN ANY 50 PUBLIC STATES FOR THE REST OF THEIR LIVES!” RESULTING IN MY DIRECTIVES BEING FOLLOWED, THAT FOUND METABOLIC ACIDOSIS IN KIDNEYS/LIVER CAUSING THE CO2 TO DROP 50% THE NORMAL RANGE AND THE PH LEVEL TO DROP 45% THE NORMAL RANGE DUE TOO MISDIAGNOSING, MISTREATING, AND FINDING ALLERGY TO GLUTEN. I SAVED THE INDIVIDUALS LIFE FROM THEMSELF AND ANY/ALL DOCTORS THAT COMMITTED MAL-PRACTICE FOR THEIR OWN FINANCIAL GREED.

    1. blank Canadian_Skeptic says:

      What exactly does “detoxification of the patient’s blood” mean? What specifically is the toxin(s) that require removal by medical intervention? Is the patient in the hospital for acute poisoning? The doctor you spoke with is right, you can’t “detoxify” something when you have no idea of what the “toxins” are.

  4. blank Doug Ducat says:

    The control group and the experimental groups have totally different diets. Adding wheat to the diet is not a non-GMO equivalent. They didn’t even ever identify what kind of GM traits were in the test group or how much of the food was actually genetically modified. They undernourished all of the rats in the study by feeding them only soy beans and grains with no supplementation, which was unnecessarily cruel and yielded no useful data. The first sentence of the conclusion actually makes no sense. Overall, this study is almost as poorly constructed as the Seralini study and certainly unethical in a similar way.
    Also, this article makes ridiculous claims that cannot be called anything other than dishonest. There aren’t thousands of scientists that support Seralini. It’s not biotech that is smearing his name; he has done that just fine on his own. At my university, we actually have used his rat study as an example of how not to design and report animal studies. I really just don’t understand the point of lying to your readers.

    1. blank Canadian_Skeptic says:

      Noticed that too about the “control” group, eh? Pretty much torpedos the entire study. Pretty amateurish science.

      1. Paid Monsanto-trolls everywhere.

        1. blank First Officer says:

          What did Doug and Guest say that wasn’t true?

    2. Seralini’s study was a duplicate of the study that Monsanto did. Except, his study was longer. He used the same rats. He faced accusations of cruelty but since when have researchers really cared about lab animals’ wellbeing? Seralini was also accused of having small groups of test animals that are statistically insignificant but in the end Monsanto only analyzed half of its lab animals. Seralini’s study was retracted after an ex-Monsanto executive was hired as editor for the journal. And it was retracted for reasons that are not valid. It was not retracted because it was fraudulent or for plagiarism but for being inconclusive. That is no valid reason and it is not even inconclusive. If that would be the case then many studies including Monsanto’s should be retracted. In the meanwhile Seralini’s study has been accepted by another journal.
      You are just a troll as so many who have commented here. Biotech companies are using agents to troll and ‘respond’ to articles that are critical of GMO.

      1. blank Jeremy David Acton says:

        It is the percentage of tumours in a group in any period of time that counts, not whether some of the control got tumours or not. In the Seralini test, the results clearly showed MORE tumours in the GMO and Roundup group. Stop your misrepresentations.

    3. blank Chris Preston says:

      Yes, I don’t think it can be emphasized enough that in feeding studies if the feed is not identical, except for the molecule(s) of interest, it is impossible to have any confidence that any changes were due to the feed.
      So all these studies that don’t control diets adequately just kill animals for no benefit.

  5. Complete garbage. People who believe this might just as well believe in Santa Claus. It’s that childish…

    1. Another Paid Monsanto-troll with a Zio Zombi background and a mind poisoned, bio-accumulated and controlled by Monsanto’s Glyphosate. Look for the deadly GMO-garbage in your food before your Alzheimer gets serious.

  6. How much do you get paid by Monsanto to write so much useless garbage ?
    My advice : drink your Roundup-Glyphosate and you are really done very soon with no further prove needed.

  7. blank ForGMOEducation says:

    Does anyone know how to contact the author of this article?

  8. blank ForGMOEducation says:

    There are so many articles that come out like this each day. Have some originality!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *