Are you worried about genetically modified trees replacing what was once known a nature? Protection groups from around the globeย have unified to publiclyย condemnย the US government for allowing the first genetically modified tree to be legalized with zeroย government or public oversight and zeroย environmental risk assessments. What’s more, the decision was made despite overwhelming public opposition.
A letter from the USDA to GE tree company ArborGenย dated last Augustย was recently exposed by scientist Doug Gurian-Sherman of the Center for Food Safety. It appears that the USDA, in all its glory, decided to allow ArborGen to pursue unregulated commercial cultivation of a genetically modified loblolly pine for altered wood composition. These trees could be planted anywhere – without you knowing.
Biologist Dr. Rachel Smolker of Biofuelwatch says:
โIf these GE loblolly pines are released on a large scale in the US, there will be no way to stop them from cross contaminating native loblolly pines.ย This is deliberate, irreversible and completely irresponsible contamination of the environment with unknown and possibly devastating consequences. Forest ecosystems are barely understood, and the introduction of trees with genes for modified wood characteristics could have all manner of negative impacts on soils, fungi, insects, wildlife, songbirds, and public health. And all this for short term commercial profit.โ
Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of Center for Food Safety, said:
โForests are complex ecosystems, and GE trees could be very disruptive.ย Instead of protecting our precious natural forests, USDA is allowing ArborGen to make a complete end-run around the regulatory system with this GE pine.โ
โTransgenicโ trees areย toutedย as:
- A means to increase productivity, including the increase of wood fibers and wood pellets needed for paper production.
- Restore certain diseased or damaged tree species.
- A means for toxic cleanup and bioremediation that will help to remove heavy metals, and reduce contaminated soils.
However:
- Fast growing, non-GMO trees are not looked to as a resource.ย Bamboo, for example, is fast-growing and is a carbon sink.
- The level of disease in GMO-planted forests is not yet determined, and since GMO crops have led to super bugs and weed-resistant super-weeds, assuming that GMO forests would be any different isย less than logical.
There is no question that the genetically modified foods infiltrating our food supply could beย causing negative health effects and compromising the quality of the ecosystem.But the genetic modification weโre working so hard to prevent goes beyond the food supply, as even trees are being genetically engineered. Someย experts say that these genetically modified trees are even more environmentally-damaging than GM foods.
In one documentary, Dr. Suzuki explains how the issues concerning genetic engineering revolves around using horizontal gene transfers, as opposed to vertical gene transfers, to create the genetic abominations. Vertical gene transfer deals with moving genes from the parent generation to offspring via sexual or asexual reproduction. Horizontal gene tranfers deals with injecting a gene from one species into a entirely different species โ something that leads to unpredictable outcomes.
What do you think of introducing genetically engineered trees?
All GMO must be stopped. The only thing that seems to work is bio-terrorism. But then isn’t that what they are doing to us?
Holy shit… Do people actually believe this crap you write on here? Patti is probably on the terrorist watch list now she said the magic words and now the NSA is tapping her entire life. Super bugs and super weeds? Do you think that they are just going to be walking around the Forrest and dumping pesticides after planting those trees? Have you ever thought that maybe you were the problem? The more organic produce you call for the more land needs to be appropriated for said produce, which means cutting down more forest. Also just so you know they don’t require testing for crossbreeding and traditional breeding of plants which can be far more dangerous than GM plants that require a lot more testing before they can even be taken out of a lab setting.
Truth is what the public thinks doesn’t matter. Does the average person have 25+ years of education in the fields of genetic engineering, bio-modification, and environmental conservation? No. So why would public opposition be relevant for approving these trees?