4 Comments

  1. blank killakhazarforjesus says:

    chemo has a 97% failure rate failure meaning most times it killed the patient not the cancer it was “treating”. cancer doesn’t even kill as many people as chemo does. what do I think should be done ? thanks for asking. convene a common law grand jury and indict the courts the judge the lawyers the dr.s anyone who willingly got involved in this family’s life on the wrong side. when the sheriff refuses to serve the warrants issue one for him too. elect a group of citizen volunteers as posse and serve them. we have the lawful processes the numbers the power and glory to finally take responsibility for ourselves. killakhazarjustforthefunofit

  2. Consider suing if she dies after taking all the chemo all involved on this mandatory treatment. They validate that she must have this or she will die without. They justify interfering by they can’t let a “child” die when they know she will die without treatment. Then she will not die with THE TREATMENT? Most of us know that is not reality. IF she dies by the court’s decision of treatment, this is “OK” by the law? However, not “OK” if it happens by the choice of treatment or none by the patient and family. Something seriously wrong with the law and the medical world! FREE COUNTRY-LAND OF OPPORTUNITY AND CHOICE. I think not.

  3. Shouldn’t the state law yield to the guardianship of the parents. For they are the ones that act in her best interest.

  4. blank nitePhyyre says:

    “But as evidenced in one of many cases, one man with stage 3 colon cancer given a 60% chance to live for a maximum of five more years under chemotherapy decided to forfeit chemo and venture into a natural health lifestyle only to be more than satisfied 9 years later.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *