15 Comments

  1. Badly written article, leaves too many questions.
    Do they replicate organ cells to create organs for testing of chemicals? Or they simulate organ for testing of chemicals?
    if its simulation, I can understand how it could speed up things. But at the end you need a real test to check if your simulation was correct or not.

  2. This fails to address the most important question. What color will their skin be??

  3. Didn’t these assha’st perform enough human experiments during ww2? The paperclip scientist and their offspring are evil garbage. We don’t need testing on anything if you get RID of the chemical companies. But all this testing is for the demise of humanity.

  4. John Sandhill says:

    nothing new – they’ve been dong it for years in taiwan – much worse i suspect – this is just bringing it out into the open now

    1. Fr.Duffy Fighting 69th says:

      They are many decades ahead of this in the bowels of the military Black Projects.

  5. Fr.Duffy Fighting 69th says:

    Where does all this lead? “Brave New World”? This is an abomination and God the Father will intervene in a way that will shock and horrify humanity. Man should not be interfering, or manipulating, life as it was created. I fear that experiments have gone way beyond this in the secret laboratories of the military/industrial complex.

    1. DarkStarAz says:

      Yeah, I’ve always thought Area 51, with it’s underground labs was less about aliens and more about genetics. You want to keep these experiments far away from the prying eyes of the media.
      Whatever tech is released to the public is 45-50 years behind black ops tech.

      1. Fr.Duffy Fighting 69th says:

        They are playing with fire…and they will get burned, forever.

  6. They’re doing horrible things with animals, so it follows that humans would be the next step. No respect for life. Anybody’s life. Apparently using adults as lab rats for testing poisonous (FDA approved, haha) prescription drugs is becoming too expensive, what with the lawsuits and deaths and all. These big corporate execs are monsters who shouldn’t be in charge of anything more important than a bake sale.

  7. Magnavision says:

    This is misleading to the max. I read the article expecting actual micro humans, instead they are making tissue on chips to test drugs. I wanted to see a little 2″ mini me running around. If anyone thinks this is a human, re-examine your definitions. Being human is more than just having cells. What about Wistar mice (I think I got that right from memory) they have some human DNA – so are they human mice hybrids? The article by the original author is just sensationalism and BS to make you think one thing is happening while it is completely something else that is really happening.

  8. The technology is comprised of smaller “lab-on-a-chip” devices. Each chip is a micro-fluidic device that mimics an organ or tissue. This is accomplished by seeding the organ-specific chips with combinations of cells native to that organ in the body. The chips are perfused with fluids to simulate blood flow and metabolic exchanges in the body. The “human-on-a-chip” is more or less a bunch of these different organ chips arranged in series. The only living component to the chips are the cells. The cells are only GE if they were derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). The cell source varies from chip to chip, and will depend on the manufacturer and application.
    The technology is a huge step forward in terms of testing safety and efficacy. It is true that a few chips linked together in series will never fully recapitulate the human body in all its tremendous complexity. Nor does science (at least good science) purport to understand everything about the human body. That said, this advance does provide researchers with 1) the means to more quickly and efficiently develop new medical treatments, 2) a way to eliminate some (though I doubt all) animal testing, and 3) a platform to attempt to answer other questions that are quite difficult and often unethical to study in animals and humans (e.g. physiological effects of pesticides or outcomes of certain nutritional deficiencies).
    I hope this helps with some of the confusion out there!

  9. CharlotteNaomi says:

    There’s me picturing mini humans running around when I clicked on this link…

  10. pandorasage says:

    If they really want tho eliminate animal experimenting, why not use the readily available stock of paedophiles and baby rapist serving life terms?
    use the prisoners serving multiple life sentences.
    what is needed is more information on these gm humans, are they fully functioning human organisms, are they born, do they have life or consciousness at any point? So many questions.
    On the other hand, those creatures locked in cells for the most vile of crimes, have already demonstrated a lack of humanity, a lack of consciousness…why not use them?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *