Newly Renamed High Fructose Corn Syrup Contains Toxic Mercury
And here is where you can find it
fructose
There’s a lot of quite concerning and truly sneaky secrets behind the ingredient known as high-fructose corn syrup. Not only has the infamously-unhealthy additive gone through a ‘renaming’ process by corporations in an attempt to fool you into eating it, but it is also known to hold some tremendously toxic baggage.
Now branded as ‘fructose’ in processed foods thanks to the whole issue of the public absolutely avoiding high-fructose corn syrup like the plague, it’s important to look back at one landmark study that revealed the presence of ultra-toxic mercury within the ingredient.
Mercury is, as all of the experts admit, toxic in all of its forms. And as the study by the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy found, nearly a third of 55 popular brand-name food and beverage products that listed HFCS as the first or second ingredient were found to contain it.
Even the co-author of the study, Dr. David Wallinga, warns:
“Mercury is toxic in all its forms. Given how much high-fructose corn syrup is consumed by children, it could be a significant additional source of mercury never before considered. We are calling for immediate changes by industry and the [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] to help stop this avoidable mercury contamination of the food supply.”
So why are we eating it?
The reality is that since 2009, when this major study was released and syndicated throughout the Washington Post and others amid the daily news cycle, we have been knowingly consuming high-fructose corn syrup that is contaminated with mercury. Bad enough on its own, this combination now puts high-fructose corn syrup over the edge as one of the worst food offenders there is.
Until the FDA takes action, the ultimate answer is to avoid eating foods that have high-fructose corn syrup hiding in its ingredients list. Here’s a list of items that commonly contain high-fructose corn syrup (and remember its new name can classify it simply as ‘fructose’):
- Soda
- Juice
- Chips and snack bags
- Candy and candy bars
- Breakfast bars
- Baking ingredients and mixes
Meanwhile, numerous companies like Hershey’s have begun moving away from high-fructose corn syrup due to consumer demand.
 | Natural Society staff contribution |
I can’t find the results anywhere. I’d like to compare it to the amount of Mercury found in fish. If someone still happens to read it, please tell me.
Boy, I’d sure like to read the paper.
Where and whom do you get your resources from?
Well, it’s new information to me. So I appreciate it! 🙂
For all you “non-conspiracy” Americans out there that believe the following listed descriptions… You are truly self deluded, stuck in denial idiots that unfortunately are dragging the rest of us with you into our early slave graves by thinking this way.
*IF You think and believe the following… you are Wrong and/or an idiot. That is all*
-There are NO CONSPIRACIES – EVER!
No Illuminati.
No Satanic pedophiles that run the world today.
No historic mistakes.
No ETs.
No chemtrails and geo-enginering
No GM food.
No TOXIC vaccinations.
No Mind Control.
No IRS.
No cabal.
No bad toothpastes.
Water with fluoride is goooood for you.
No scandals including the ‘elite’.
Nope. NOTHING!
Hey look – Miley Cyrus has a cameltoe!
Making your rounds I see, Ryan. Shill.
BAaaaaa….men
Keep living that way, you will die sooner than the ones who actually have opened their eyes and fight for a better world. It’s what we need.
You clearly didn’t understand ANY of his statements. He IS awed and has his eyes open.
Sulfites in Wine and Champagne illustrates one misconception
Sulfites – basic facts
Sulfites are “strongly linked” to the rapid increase of cancers, particularly stomach and throat, and the massive surge in asthma.
Sulphite intolerance is massively on the increase.
Ask any allergy consultant and they will tell you that the human body reaches a point where it is “full” of certain toxins then can’t tolerate any more and the allergy is born, as part of the body’s defense system to stop you taking in any more of the substance.
Sulfites have been in virtually every food and drink for the last 30 years and many people are no longer able to tolerate them.
In the same time asthma rates have increased from 2% to 35% and cancer rates have shot up.
10% of the population has now severe sulphite allergy. These are the lucky ones, unable to continue poisoning themselves unlike those who don’t have an obvious reaction.
The BMA stated that two glasses of wine a day can dramatically increase your chances of contracting cancer – about 95% of wine consumed in the UK is factory produced and laced with sulfites and chemicals.
The alcohol itself isn’t actually bad for you (in moderation), it is the added chemicals, sulfites in particular.
Need for Sulfites in wine – basic facts
Wines made the traditional way, selecting grapes to keep rot out of the wine, last for at least six years without any sulfites.
Any wine lasts at least one year without any sulfites.
Amount of sulfites (sulfur dioxide) in Wine or Champagne now – basic facts
1. It’s now almost impossible to buy wine or champagne without sulfites.
2. The amount of sulfites added has stealily increased during the last decade.
Example: In the EU the maximum levels of sulfur dioxide that a wine can contain are 160 ppm for red wine, 210 ppm for white wine and 400 ppm for sweet wines.
But a simple test shows that nearly every bottle contains dozens of times more: open the bottle, fill a glass, put the rest of the bottle in the freezer for at least 30 hours.
After it unfreezes, the sulfites will deposit as a white powder at the bottom of the bottle, almost one centimeter thick.
3. Any person who knows what organic wine is will immediately notice the disgusting reaction in taste caused by sulfites.
Sulfites in Wine and Champagne: Illuminati Religion: the basic facts
These are the main reasons for the illuminati agenda “sulfites in all wine for the human cattle”
1. Another weapon of mass destruction implementing the Global genocide agenda
2. Part of the agenda “deny all basic assets to the human cattle” (from water and wine withouth chemicals to children).
3. Mock the human cattle by having wine “experts” classify and price all these poisoned wines from $5 to $500.
4. Implement mass production of wine.
The last reason is not the main but indeed only the fourth most important reason.
I’m very allergic to corn in where migraines last for days and even send me to the hospital. When I read the re-naming of corn syrup I want to cry. Who do I sue when I get really sick? Honetly I don’t eat box cereals but …..
I learned of this many years ago, and completely eliminated high fructose corn syrup from my diet. I just consume products that use sugar. Within a matter of 2 months I lost weight and my hair started growing rapidly. I didn’t expect these results, but was glad i got off that toxic stuff. There are other options for products that do not put HFCS in their products.
The FDA, EPA, USDA are corrupt and do not regulate for safety. What these agencies label as acceptable for human exposure or consumption is appalling. Stop looking for these agencies to set reasonable regulations for toxins.
When did this happen? The last time I heard they had been overruled, and were not being allowed to rename.
why cant they just use cane sugar?
It costs more than High Fat Corn Shit, because corn is subsidized by government.
I just HAVE to comment…
“Mercury is toxic in all its forms…”
YES! I must agree, and having said that… What the hell are dentists doing planting the $#!! into your mouth in the form of dental amalgams (that would be ‘fillings’ for those confused). Oh yeah, mercury is also present in vaccines, but those are good for you too, right?
Just like they state fluoridated water is good for your teeth, which in actuality it isn’t. It’s a neurotoxin and literally reduces your IQ….yet they dump it in our public waters.
Mercury is in nearly everything, look it up.
But it’s in so low quantities, that it’s not deadly, or even toxic.
Mercury bio-accumulates, that is a little here a little there it stays in your system and reaches toxic levels slowly so you can’t point the finger at this or that.
Anything that has any ingredients with the ability to slow kill you should be color coded for easy consumer reference.
That would involve the FDA regulating products, which they don’t. lol
good post-but under nafta rules,the label’ frutose’-may mean fruits or corn syrup,since the early 1990’s-in canaduh and ussa.Nafta rules.I had heard of this earlier but it came too a head for me as all corn stocks were contaminated with bt insert gmo corn(starlink) in the late 1990’s-starting before it was approved for hog feed.My toxic symptoms matched those of the pigs fed it and my consumption was not excessive.The bt levels from the original -leak are still going through the maize crops.Hybrid sterility is never zero and in this case runs 2%.Is the mercury coming from processing or old soil contamination from mercury treated seed or coal ash discharge?
I stopped drinking ‘soda’ 22 years ago. NO ONE should be drinking it..it is poison…..
im drinking one right now..truth is i hardly drink anymore but i like the flavor of cherry coke..i know its super bad but i let myself off the hook once in awhile
Mexicana cokes use pure cane sugar (they are in the glass bottles). They cost a bit more, but without the effect of HFCS.
really, they use regular sugar in the glass bottles… didn’t know that, so those who are better off, are less likely to get the most HFCS. … same old story hey.
They couldn’t come up with a better name than “fructose?” I’ve read a few labels that had “fructose” on them and I immediately knew they meant high-fructose corn syrup. What else?
Well, here is the problem… If I pick up an apple (or any piece of fruit) it contains naturally occurring Fructose, not factory HFCS. By renaming, you will not have any idea if the product uses natural fructose as an additive or if they are using HFCS.
Gee. It’s almost like they plan on killing us, isn’t it? Good thing the gubbermint loves us and will protect us.
They don’t want to kill you. They want to make a truckload of money treating you with pharmaceuticals for as many years as possible.
Bingo, it’s quite the racket and hard not being forced to play!
they want to make people ill, the money is there… but considering there is no need for these products to be so toxic, money is unlikely to be the only motivator… look at fluoride in the water, known toxin, consumed under a medical pretence, with the same does in the water of a 15 stone man, a 9 stone pregnant woman, a baby, the elderly… the only reason fluoride is in the water is for it’s effects on humans, except those it claims i.e. tooth health, in fact drinking fluoride is not a way to effect teeth in any way but negatively, it can only add strength used topically.
But even saying it’s the money, that means the governments of the world, allow corporation poison people for money. That is intentional, so even if the goal was not outright to harm people, the corporation are given the “right” to poison people for money, allowed by the people who supposed to work FOR the people of that nation.. our employees get a back hander, funding and support, to poison us, their employers.
Of course it contains mercury. They didn’t reformulate the product. Just rename it.
Renaming it to FRUCTOSE will be the death knell of it. Anyone who is into health food will tell you to avoid FRUCTOSE sugar because of it causing severe health problems and actually makes it easier to identify.
So thanks stupid!
But, those who are into health foods are not interested in that crap……….and don’t usually go looking for information on what they are consuming.