Print Friendly and PDF

Mainstream Medical Pharmaceutical ‘Science’ Goes Against Nature

Anthony Gucciardi
December 30th, 2011
Updated 11/06/2012 at 10:15 pm
Pin It

space1 210x131 Mainstream Medical Pharmaceutical Science Goes Against Nature

Is it possible to thrive without antipsychotics, high-powered painkillers, and statin drugs? More importantly, are natural alternatives really as ‘dangerous’ as mainstream health officials claim? Sure, there have been some great advancements in the field of medical science in this field, but profit mongering and a blatant disregard for public health has driven big pharma giants to throw science to the wind and unleash a variety of harmful yet profitable pharmaceuticals.

It is thanks to this motive that pharmaceuticals have now led to more deaths than traffic fatalities in the United States. Killing at least 37,485 people nationwide in 2009, the mainstream medical structure continues to not only ignore natural alternatives but actually goes as far as to label them ‘dangerous’ and completely deny their effectiveness. Vitamin D, which can be obtained by simply stepping outside, has been found to slash your risk of cancer, obesity, and the flu. Of course unless you are supplementing thousands of times over the safe limit of vitamin D, there are virtually zero side effects to accompany these benefits.

Meanwhile, statin drugs have been linked in peer-reviewed research to more than 304 diseases conservatively.

This information directly challenges and disproves the claims of many supposed health ‘experts’ that pharmaceuticals and invasive mainstream medical interventions are the only answer to treating (certainly not curing) disease. If we were to see a medical paradigm shift into natural, or at least integrated medicine, we would see a dramatic slash in cancer rates simply from educating the world about the benefits of free vitamin D. Some estimates place 70% of U.S. children in the vitamin D deficiency category, as well as a large number of adults. Imagine if health officials were to adopt more integrated health principals, such as the consumption and supplementation of a spice known as turmeric.

Turmeric is known to positively affect over 573 diseases according to peer-reviewed research. Why have the governments of the world not recommended these free or inexpensive supplements to their citizens, potentially saving billions in healthcare costs per year? Instead, government organizations like the CDC and the FDA push pharmaceuticals on the public while suppressing many health-promoting supplements like turmeric.

The truth of the matter is that big pharma cannot profit on free vitamin D, or extremely inexpensive turmeric. In a nation where public health was truly a concern, these substances would be readily available and replacing harmful pharmaceuticals that contain 70 negative side-effects on average. Hospitals, which offer no form of prevention against disease, would slowly begin to disappear as the need diminishes. Citizens would optimize their health through avoiding toxic ingredients like mercury-containing high-fructose corn syrup, BPA, and genetically modified ingredients after they were all outlawed from domestic and imported food products.

Currently, we live in a very unnatural society. You are not meant to feel sick, broken down, and rely upon invasive surgeries and damaging pharmaceuticals to sustain your health. It’s time to shift to a new health paradigm, where natural living is paramount.

About Anthony Gucciardi:
1.thumbnail Mainstream Medical Pharmaceutical Science Goes Against NatureGoogle Plus ProfileAnthony is the Editor of NaturalSociety whose work has been read by millions worldwide and is routinely featured on major alternative and mainstream news website alike, including the powerful Drudge Report, NaturalNews, Daily Mail, and many others. Anthony has appeared on programs like Russia Today (RT), Savage Nation, The Alex Jones Show, Coast to Coast AM, and many others. Anthony is also dedicated to aiding various non-profit organizations focused around health and rehabilitation as well as the creator of the independent political website Storyleak

From around the web:

  • TomT

    The author assumes that statins treat a disease, ie heart disease. He assume wrong. Heart disease is not a disease. Arterial narrowing is caused by high blood homocysteine, lowered with vitamins B6, B12, and folates; high blood lipo-protein alpha, LDL, lowered with anit-oxidants such as vitamins C, D3, E and selenium, l-cysteine etc; and high tri-glycerides, blood fats elevated by too many carbs, especially sugars, hfcs, and, alcohol.

    Dietary and high blood cholesterol are not in the loop.….

    Statins artificially alter the LDL profile to show ..good, but that does NOT reverse arterial narrowing, and in most cases arterial narrowing continues, as the main causes have not been addressed.

    Statins therefore are totally fraudulent, falsely intented to treat a NON-condition, (not a disease).

  • Tom Dark

    Last I read, the 2003 report from JAMA counted 225,000 people killed annually by prescriptions in the U.S.: 100,000 deaths by improper diagnosis, 125,000 from proper, and none of these in any case were due to pill abuse by patients.

    Has the fashion of counting changed somehow, that the annual number of pill-deaths has dropped from six figures to five?

    What's 2,100 times fifty states? The Ohio Bureau of Workmen's Compensation estimates 2,100 workman's comp patients killed this way every year… a great many of which are deaths from tranquilizers and painkillers given patients who are waiting for operations for broken bones and the like. The side effects of these pills are suicidal depression. As those patients even drain their bank accounts paying for the pills, as they're required to do that themselves.

    Their deaths, it turns out, are highly profitable to the financial concerns involved. 2,100 die of pillicide, having paid for each one themselves; they don't get around to getting those pricey operations after all.

    If anyone's curious, I get this from a book by an author who's using a fake name for fear. I've interviewed her personally, extensively. She gets her stats from thousands of pages of Ohio State administrative and court documentation and hundreds of hours of videotapes provided by a medical practitioner who has since left that system; he also fears for his safety, as the financial system behind Ohio's horrendous workmen's comp system appears to include the legendary Mafia.

    There's never just the one cockroach in the kitchen. Are the practices in all other workmen's comp bureaus in all other states pristine, devoid of the likes of the people-killing mill in Ohio?

    if not, 2,100 x 50 = 105,000. Do I have that right?

  • mile

    trust the peope who make profits from harm they cause..?

  • Anonymous

    Thanks Anthony, I wish everyone in the world would read this.

  • David A. McElroy

    We would do well to remember John D. Rockefeller's heavy hand in the formative years of the American Medical Association and pharmaceutical companies he was investing in. He built everything with a greedy profit-taking philosophy where "competition is a sin". He left a legacy of authoritarian monopoly extracting its pound of flesh in the guise of healthcare. I fear Obamacare will take our "care" to genocidal levels.

    • Jack

      Great points David and great article overall.