50% Increase in Breast Cancer Expected, But No One Talks About its Biggest Causes
A new study from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) predicts fifty percent more women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in the next few decades, with more than 441,000 new cases expected in the US by 2030. The study points to an aging population as the reason why we can expect such a dramatic leap in breast cancer cases, but is that the real reason why women’s health is increasingly in jeopardy?
While women have begun literally removing ovaries and breasts from their bodies, as Angelina Jolie is now famous for, the real cancer-causing culprits continue to be rampant in our daily lives. The truth is that we are bombarded with countless chemicals that pose a hazard to our health. Specifically, hormone disrupting chemicals such as bisphenol-A (BPA), which is often used in plastics, are attacking us at full speed.
Even Susan G. Komen, known for its “race for the cure,” has completely denied the link between breast cancer and the toxic byproduct of manufacturing – bisphenol.
As breastcancer.org explains:
“BPA is a weak synthetic estrogen found in many rigid plastic products, food and formula can linings, dental sealants, and on the shiny side of paper cashier receipts (to stabilize the ink). Its estrogen-like activity makes it a hormone disruptor, like many other chemicals in plastics. Hormone disruptors can affect how estrogen and other hormones act in the body, by blocking them or mimicking them, which throws off the body’s hormonal balance.”
Furthermore, Natural Society pointed out several years ago that BPA was linked to cancer in over 130 studies. Funny how high-profile non-profits like Susan G. Komen refuse to mention this at all, and even deny it. And the MSM does no better.
What’s even more despicable is that Susan G. Komen for the Cure spent $141 million for breast cancer education (PDF download) recently. But this ‘education’does not cover the legitimate nutritional and chemical-exposure issues that contribute to the development of breast cancer and cancer overall.
Some are calling what Susan G. Komen really does ‘pink-washing.’ They have ties to big pharmaceutical companies and less than a dime of every dollar raised actually goes toward curing breast cancer.
With a disturbing 50 percent increase in breast cancer cases expected by 2030, shouldn’t all that money be going to actually treat and prevent cancer?
I am pretty much for the cure against cancers, but not encouraging women to mutilate their bodies, because it’s awful.
Susan G. Komen has NO interest in curing Cancer. I wish that people would wake up and STOP contributing to this Corrupt organization.
Susan G Komen is all about the money, NOT about helping to find a Cure for this devestating disease!
Breast tissue cells are especially susceptible to chemical pollutants, and it is criminal for ALL of the research to be directed at seeking a cure for breast cancer. However worthy such research is, it is indeed part of the whole treatment of breast cancer as a GROWTH INDUSTRY.
Meanwhile no funding goes to seeking causes – other than exploring genetics and those well known “blame the victim” causes in personal lifestyle. It is indisputable scientific fact that the major causes (or “triggers” if you like that term better) of cancer are environmental.
This has been known since 19th century chimney sweepers developed a high incidence of scrotal cancer, and since Sir Richard Doll’s research showed that tobacco smoking caused lung cancer.
But the Establishment carefully avoids seeking the triggers, causes of breast cancer.
I wish that this author had included ionising radiation as a cause. Hushed up thought it might be, the record of atomic bombing in Japan, and atomic bomb testing in the Pacific illustrates the scientifically known facts on ionising radiation also as a major cause of breast cancer.