Tobacco Companies Again Ordered to Disclose Harm from Cigarettes
Big Tobacco companies like Phillip Morris STILL have to make public statements about smoking’s harmful effects. U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler said so in an 11-page court decision. She also slammed the industry’s fraudulent tactics to promote smoking and called the companies’ request to rewrite the public disclosures “ridiculous.”
The ruling stems from an anti-racketeering case that was brought against nine Big Tobacco companies 15 years ago. The conclusion was that the cigarette makers had engaged for over 50 years in a “pervasive scheme to defraud customers and potential customers.” The companies had joined together to make more money by deceiving the public about smoking’s “devastating health effects.”
The companies were ordered to make corrective disclosures on their cigarette packaging, in their ads and on their websites. That’s why they SHOULD be putting out ads that look like this one:
But more often their ads subtly promote a positive image of cigarettes.
A study found that Philip Morris’s “Think. Don’t Smoke” ads resulted in more positive beliefs and attitudes towards cigarettes.
Those beliefs increased even after the campaign was no longer aired. Youths who recalled the ads were also less likely to say that they would not smoke within the next year. This study confirmed earlier findings that the anti-smoking campaign actually caused favorable feelings about the tobacco industry.
Read: 7 Huge Negative Effects of Smoking
The campaign’s purpose was not to discourage smoking, but to gain respectability and favor for it among the young.
Fortunately, Judge Kessler approved a draft requiring the cigarette makers to declare that they “intentionally designed cigarettes to make them more addictive” and to
“maximize the ingestion of nicotine, adding ammonia to make the cigarette taste less harsh, and controlling the physical and chemical make-up of the tobacco blend.”
Judge Slams Ineffective Stop-Smoking Ads
Kessler was blunt about Big Tobacco’s so-called stop-smoking campaigns:
“Defendants never recommend that parents inform their children that smoking kills more than 400,000 people each year, involves an addiction that most smokers desire to end, and will harm those around the smoker. Nor do Defendants ever suggest that parents, as role models for their children, stop smoking.”
“[B]oth Lorillard’s and Philip Morris’s media campaigns promote the message that smoking is an adult decision. Emphasizing that smoking is an adult activity underscores the desirability of engaging in adult behavior for adolescents who are particularly motivated to appear mature.”
Big Tobacco was also required to include a preamble admitting that a federal court had found they “deliberately deceived the American public” about:
“the adverse health effects of smoking and second-hand smoke, the addictiveness of nicotine, the manipulation of cigarette design, and the lack of a significant difference between regular and “light” cigarettes.”
The industry appealed this ruling, but the D.C. Circuit Court upheld the mandate for making disclosures to correct possible misinformation about tobacco products. The court said, though, that the companies couldn’t be compelled to admit their past acts of deliberate deception.
Tobacco Industry’s Attempt to Rewrite Disclosure Statements is Rejected
After mediation, Big Tobacco filed a 40-page brief seeking to rewrite all five of the court-approved disclosure statements. The cigarette makers also wanted the preamble to use the word “determined” instead of “ordered.” They further sought to completely remove their names from the statements and to remove a separate line stating, “Here is the truth.” Fortunately, the court would have none of it.
Judge Kessler wrote in a Feb. 8, 2016 ruling:
“That is ridiculous – a waste of precious time, energy, and money for all concerned – and a loss of information for the public. The court has no intention of following that path, although it is obvious that defendants are, once again, attempting to stall any final outcome to this long-standing litigation.”
Kessler opined that it’s already too little too late. The original ruling for these companies to come clean about the health damage they have caused multiple generations will stand.
Tobacco Industry Forced to List Ingredients Used in Their Products
In 2009, the Food and Drug Administration gained authority to regulate tobacco products, and now they will soon be exercising that ability. Already releasing preliminary guidelines for the tobacco industry that can educate consumers on exactly what is in cigarettes, the FDA is making it so tobacco companies will have to report on the amount of harmful and unsafe ingredients used in their products.
The Dangerous Ingredients in Tobacco Products
Within one year, the FDA plans to share information on chemical amounts, while tobacco makers will be required to report on the amount of 93 substances used in their products. This means that harmful ingredients used such as ammonia and formaldehyde will need to be made known to the public. This decision will certainly ignite a slew of ingredient-based information regarding tobacco products.
“We are forging new territory to ensure that tobacco companies provide accurate information and do not mislead American consumers. We are committed to stopping such practices that may cause people to start or continue using tobacco products that could lead to preventable disease and death,” FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg said in a statement.
There are over 4,000 individual compounds identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke, with at least 60 of them being known carcinogens. How would you feel after finding out that with every cigarette comes a dose of insecticide, car exhaust, gas chamber poison, ant poison, floor cleaner, mothballs, and nuclear weapon material? The fact is, there are hundreds of chemicals in tobacco products (and cigarettes especially) that people don’t even know about.
- Insecticide – nicotine
- Car exhaust – carbon monoxide
- Gas chamber poison – hydrogen cyanide
- Ant poison – ammonia
- Mothballs – naphthalene
- Nuclear power – radioactive compounds
While this kind of information won’t be responsible for ending the bad habit of smoking for the majority of individuals, it may serve to kick the habit for many.
Even while smoking and tobacco use is already known to cause various cancers such as lung cancer, throat cancer, and stomach cancer, the health damaging aspects of smoking aren’t enough for people to quit. But now, seeing “formaldehyde”, “lead”, and “arsenic” on the label may just be enough to cause many people to finally quit smoking and tobacco use.
And yet they will not make it so GMO is labeled?……i guess the tobacco guys forgot to sign that last check huh??….
Of all the comments, yours makes the most sense.
tobacco is not the issue, the paper is. Until the are required to list the ingredients of the paper, and filter, the issue still remains troubling.
this is a fact, my brother worked for the worlds largest manufacturer of cigarette paper (company located in New Jersey) and he said this "if people only knew what chemicals were in the paper tobacco is rolled into they would STOP SMOKING)……AMEN
ANONYMOUS INTELLIGENCE GROUP OCCU-3.1416, DISCOVERED FROM TOBACCO RE-DRYING TECHNICIANS, THAT BULK TOBACCO IS SEALED IN A VACUUM TREATMENT WAREHOUSE, AND FUMIGATED WITH CYANIDE GAS TO KILL TOBACCO EATING WORMS, WHOSE EXISTENCE IN THE INSECT WORLD IS TOP SECRET!!!
The corporations that own, er, I mean, the people that run the FDA must think we're all fools. One can tolerate trace amounts of anything, just ask 'em, 'cause according to the FDA:
Polluting the entire North-American continent with heavy radio-isotopes – no problem.
Taking pharmaceuticals with often devastating and sometimes fatal side-effects – no problem.
Driving cars/trucks from which emanate 2,500 different carcinogens while belching vast amounts of carbon monoxide & soot – no problem.
Consuming genetically modified organisms while remaining uninformed that your doing so – no problem.
Consuming seafood contaminated with heavy metals, radio-isotopes and pharmaceuticals that haven't been in the market even ten years yet – no problem.
Breathing so-called 'clean' air that actually contains over 10,000 kinds of mutagens, micro-organisms, particulates of feces and other pollutants – no problem.
But smoke some tobacco? now THAT'S A PROBLEM!!!
The real corruption of the cigarette has occured when certain people conspired to make so called "Fire Safe Cigarettes."
The definition is b*lls*it, the sticks now taste like glue, no matter the brand name, probably cause more problems then they claim to solve, and many people on the web are complaining of health issues brought on by these so called FSC!
Check your pack, it'll say on the bottom or somewhere, FSC!
so, basically the fda can ban drugs that may be a bit unsafe for our health but the benefit of cures will prevail BUT they will not ban something that has no health benefit and will absolutely kill you, in painful and long term ways. i think someone needs to look at this government agency and revamp it a bit.
I have spent the last hour or two trying to find out what is in largo pipe tobacco! Why can’t I find a list of ingredients???
Amen is a god king from the east. He is named over and over in the bibles. look for yourself. bad temper too