17 Comments

  1. blank Palmerston Zoo says:

    When you lose in the court of public opinion the state will resort to force. This removal of informed consent is no different then rape. Rape is sex without one parties’ consent. What is the difference? I see none.

    1. blank Frederikahere says:

      You are absolutely right.
      This is truly a gross violation of a person’s sovereignty over their own body.

  2. blank Palmerston Zoo says:

    Facts
    Not one single primate study as been performed that has shown the recommended vaccine schedule to be safe.

    No studies have been done on combined vaccines such as MMR. They have only been tested individually (if you believe their safety studies). No one has studied if children can handle them all combined.

    No longitudinal studies comparing the health outcomes of vaccinated population against the health outcomes of unvaccinated children.

    1. blank pitchfork says:

      They even rig the tests to control the results. They contaminate the placebo with all the toxins also so that the net affect is “see, the vaccine aint that bad.” Its all a total fraud!

  3. blank Frederikahere says:

    You should do the same. Follow your advice before posting.

  4. The government is not forcing people to vaccinate their children. You still have a choice, you just won’t be given up to $15k (which is a privilege, NOT a right) if you don’t. If you want to receive welfare generated by people in the community, you need to respect the community – in this case, by getting your children vaccinated so they are no longer a danger to the community at large.
    Vaccinations are necessary because they eliminate infectious diseases. Previously, measles, polio and whopping cough were nearly non-existent in the US. Drop the vaccination rates, and now we’re seeing outbreaks in multiple areas. These diseases can be wiped out if we vaccinate. The argument of, “How does my unvaccinated child hurt your vaccinated child?” does not work – we need vaccination rates to be around 95% to generate herd immunity, which will protect those who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons (e.g. immunocompromised, allergic, etc.), and to eliminate these preventable diseases once and for all. Vaccinations worked for smallpox, and they will work for other diseases too – but only if we vaccinate.

    1. Just because THEY say it was measles …don’t make it so….

    2. blank Notborn Yesterday says:

      Squish (a strangely appropriate handle), it matters not which side of the debate on which you stand. The fact is that it is quite ILLEGAL for the government to do what it is doing. Under section 51 of the Australian Constitution, the govt may make laws re:, … here it is: QUOTE: “medical and dental services (but not so as to authorize any form of civil conscription) UNQUOTE.

      Clearly, when our government is set to disobey the ONLY law that “We the People” impose on it in order to write illegal laws to bind us, we have entered that time of “lawlessness” to which the Bible refers. Now I wonder, Squish, what do YOU suppose could be the motive of the Framers of our Constitution for prohibiting governmental blackmail to enforce medical conscriptions? Do you think they had confidence in unfailing governmental beneficence? Or do you suppose that with the centuries of history behind them they saw the potential for something more sinister and wanted to preserve the ability of We the People to preserve a modicum of control on our government?

      In recent years, the courts have moved towards interpreting law according to the intent of its authors, even down to referring to notes made by them at the time. Given that there was no government social security when the Constitution was written, it is quite clear that the withholding of tens of thousands of dollars of tax-paid social security to force citizens to vaccinate would have absolutely been prohibited by that law.

      There is only one way to make such a heinous government act legal: Hold a referendum and change the Constitution. But the government knows that it is unlikely – highly unlikely to succeed when that vote is put to We the People.

    3. blank Aloysius Knight says:

      Nice to see a voice of reason on here. Unfortunately your arguments fall on deaf ears. Not vaccinating children is akin to child abuse. Wish I had seen this back when you had originally posted it, i’m a bit late to say, good on you. Thank you for giving a damn.

  5. blank Ray Reyes says:

    Its very disturbing how “Western” countries/societies are getting more and more totalitarian by the day.

  6. blank John Stoker says:

    Somewhere in this exists more than meets the eye. First since when has a government been genuine about concern over your children or your health? Its likely big money, big authority for some undeclared strategy or heaven forbid a government that has signed onto euthanasia in disguise,

    A band of the nation’s most untrustworthy group of professionals reasons what’s best for you, flying in the face of a myriad of data disproving the efficacy of vaccination. Rather the opposite demonstrating what a bloody fool you are going down the vaccination road. Civil disobedience and efforts to expose the parties pushing this malevolent process is fast becoming vital – this is step 101 – close to forced medication which is probable step 3 or 4.

  7. those reading below may miss my comment to john. am reposting here.
    yes john it goes deeper than that and yes it is scarey. I’m from Sydney and this government here is unbelieveable. No respect for the environment for starters and we need the world to stand up and protect us from laws like this one. It goes further than this in fact, You have to present the kids vaccination papers to get the kid into school OR get a doctor to SIGN that its ok they are not vaccinated and the doc of course is answerable to the medical board etc etc, See the loop, the pattern all designed to take our freedom and head to a dictatorship. Bad news. We need the world to help us object…please

  8. Thanks Christina.

    Australia: everybody must get vaccinated, except the Prime Minister’s daughters
    By Jon Rappoport
    2006: Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott refused to vaccinate his daughters
    Meet vaccine refuser, Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott
    We’re talking about Tony Abbott, who just ruled from on high that there are no more exemptions from vaccines in Australia.

  9. blank joejoev1 . says:

    I wouldn’t want to live in a ‘Forced Medical State’, the drug companies have taken control of people’s lives, which in many cases could end them, how the sad people of Australia go along with this evil is beyond logic.

  10. those so called experts and you are full of $hit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *