I try to write about natural health and food safety issues without putting my personal life into them too often, but we all know our personal views can influence us. I’m going to tell you how upset I am by the CDC’s declaration that mothers should delay breastfeeding to boost vaccine efficacy.
Here it is – I know not everyone agrees about vaccines, and that’s O.K. But what isn’t O.K. is when a government agency meant to prevent the spread of disease (well, at least that’s what they say openly) tells mothers to stop doing one thing that has mountains of evidence behind it to prove that it is not only beneficial, but vital to an infant’s health.
When you think the CDC might be corrupt, as evidenced from recent whistle-blowing facts, you don’t always realize just how deep and dark that corruption truly can be. The news that not one, but ten researchers from the CDC’s National Centers for Immunization and Respiratory Disease (NCIRD) released a paper arguing that because the immune-boosting effects of breastmilk inhibit the effects of the live oral rotavirus vaccine, nursing mothers should delay breastfeeding their infants is stupefying.
Although this paper does not recommend that mothers stop breastfeeding, it does advise them to delay nursing at the time that the vaccine is administered. At least there isn’t advice to stop breastfeeding completely.
In a seemingly weak attempt to remain scientifically unbiased, the researchers do point out that there are other ways for boosting a vaccine’s efficacy.
The researchers make the most ignominious admittance that:
- Breastmilk counters the live vaccine, they’ve shown that breastmilk counters the virus.
- When a baby’s body is fighting the live vaccine virus, it means they are fighting the virus itself. Proof, yet again that the human immune system, when supported through natural means like breastfeeding, is expert at defending itself.
If the CDC were not beholden to big pharmaceutical companies, who make billions off of unproven, unnecessary vaccines every year, then they would never be telling women to stop giving their babies immune-boosting breastmilk.
Read: Breastfeeding Could Save 830,000 Lives Annually
The CDC should be encouraging mothers to breastfeed, not telling them to stop so that their children can be given vaccines full of questionable adjuvants, and some that have been proven, by yet other whistle-blowers like Pfizer’s president who says that vaccines don’t work – to contain many health damaging ingredients.
This also means that the CDC’s researchers are assuming that the vaccine is better for the baby than breastfeeding. They’re assuming that the vaccine is safe.
The researchers also compared the breastmilk from mothers in India, South Korea, Vietnam, and the U.S. Indian mothers had the most potent breastmilk in fighting the vaccine, while U.S. moms had the weakest. Is it any wonder with glyphosate residues being found in mother’s breast milk and even fetal cells? Did you know that Pfizer was a spin off on Monsanto? Are we starting to see the link here?
I’m a breastfeeding mother of a six month old. I won’t stop breastfeeding my child, and certainly not for this reason.
http://www.snopes.com/medical/disease/cdcbreastfeeding.asp
Thank you Vicki!!
Once again it has been proven that chrissy either can’t do any research or would rather purposely lie about certain topics (vaccines and gmos). Again one must ask why? Why does she do it? Why does Natural Society allow her to do it? What other truths are they hiding from us?
http://vactruth.com/2011/04/05/experts-recommend-delaying-breastfeeding-until-vaccinations-have-taken-effect/
If Vicki gets her facts from Snopes whose statement is “Rumor Has IT” couldn’t possibly contain any true Facts. Until you actually do some real, critical research from real, Reputable organizations, you have absolutely Zero credibility. The facts are NOT to be obtained from Pharmaceutical sponsored Universities who skew their numbers because if they don’t, they receive no more funding. The only real place to get untainted results is from privately funded organizations that won’t alter their results for the benefit of Big Pharma.
Oh yes the great conspiracy. It always fits when you have been proven wrong.
What do you know about the benefits of breastmilk? What do you know about healthcare, in general? Not much, I wager.
I wish you people would realize that many if not most of the GMOs Fanatics are PAID commenters.
These drones e.g. GMO Roberts are very likely to be working in a government office building’s basement handling dozens of accounts on hundreds of websites.
This is how they spread their disease (GMOs) into the virtual world of the internet. Exactly how they spread it in the real world —> LIES, LIES and more LIES.
I’ve been dealing with this guy for months. I am quite aware that he’s a troll. I’m also aware that he denies this vehemently, even though he makes profit from the chemical ag sector.
You must like to lose!
Ok, Bobo. Tell me how you would treat yourself for cancer, then…
GMO Roberts you are a disgusting person, you disgusting corporate parasite.
Faced with the truth the best you can do is throw insults?
You’re not serious, are you? You must not have been researching information long in the world to reference Snopes for anything serious.
CDC is nothing but a medical scams and full of corruptions.
Snopes is run and founded by Democrat Party apparatchiks with $$$.
From Snopes: The CDC has issued no guidelines whatsoever suggesting that breastfeeding should be delayed, either temporarily or at length, for any reason related to vaccine efficacy. Not only does the CDC not recommend mothers stop breastfeeding, that agency actively encourages nursing based on AAP guidance. The claim the CDC “recommended that mothers stop breastfeeding in order to increase the efficacy of vaccines” is a misleading one based on a 2010 study that simply observed the effects of breast milk on a single vaccine and neither made recommendations nor created guidelines about the cessation of breastfeeding in order to increase vaccine efficacy. Read more at http://www.snopes.com/medical/disease/cdcbreastfeeding.asp#k5gR3eMiMb4kkZze.99
This is a view common in Big Pharma. They understand that breast milk interferes with vaccines. Raw organic milk helps the body. Vaccines damage it.
How Big Pharma and the social engineers are countering this is by undermining the health of the woman so she can’t even produce breast milk. The plan is to redefine “success” and motivate women to go through years of worthless education then enter the job market with the idea to be CEOs. This spits the woman out way down the line so by the time she decides to have children, she’s either in her late 30’s or early 40’s. By that point, she’s consumed so much GMO and had so many vaccines, she can no longer generate the milk the baby needs. And that’s assuming she’ll even be able to conceive.
Women [and men] need to be raised to have clean bodies (vessels), raise them in good homes with mothers AND fathers, as well encourage to marry and have families while in their mid-twenties or at the latest, mid-thirties. If you want to fight the system, establish your independence and be healthy.
You are such a jerk. Shame on you.
My comment about the jerk was meant for GMO Roberts. Anyone who thinks that it is beneficial for infants to be given diseases and to make them more susceptible to those diseases is pathologically criminal. The outcomes can be life-altering and it certainly isn’t worth taking the chance, just in case your child may someday come into contact with polio, measles or diphtheria, etc, and so on for how many different life threatening diseases GMO Roberts? You seem to continually represent yourself as well educated and well informed. You must know how many diseases small infants are given at one time. Anyone who truly has a heartfelt love for their baby will know instinctively that this is wrong. It is emotionally disturbing to both mother and child to stop the nurturing of breastfeeding when you are already doing the practice. To stop the practice so that some medical person can infect your child with pathogens is horrible. So, there GMO Roberts. You finally got me to engage. Don’t feel too proud. I did it because you are easy to hate. In that you are successful.
All worked up, but to much of a coward to reply directly? If you were half as smart as you claimed you would have actually looked in the information in this article instead of blindly accepting it as true like a zombie. These lies Chrissy puts out are even new. They date back several years and the CDC never said the things she claims. So get off your high horse and stop backing lies, or did you actually start them years ago? Oh and by the way, I have no fear of my child running into those diseases as he is fully vaccinated, and any parent who doesn’t love their children enough to protect them through vaccination should have them taken away.
I completely agree with you, Christina. This is beyond stupid, IMO.
This article is misleading and terrified the crap out of me at first. The last paragraph of the abstract states: “The lower immunogenicity and efficacy of rotavirus vaccines in poor developing countries could be explained, in part, by higher titers of IgA and neutralizing activity in breast milk consumed by their infants at the time of immunization that could effectively reduce the potency of the vaccine. Strategies to overcome this negative effect, such as delaying breast-feeding at the time of immunization, should be evaluated.” No one said they had to stop nursing their child, they said it should be evaluated! Good grief! Report correct please!
If Chrissy can’t find a quote that suits her she is more than happy to make one up.
I just wanna be a sheep – bah bah bah bah – cause sheep they don’t think … I just want to be a sheep bah bah bah bah …