Ken Caldeira works for the Department of Global Ecology for the Carnegie Institute of Washington. Before I get ahead of myself, you should also know that Mr. Caldeira attended a conference with other internationally recognized geo-engineers who were discussing something that many of us still deny exist – chemtrails. Mr. Caldeira used to work on ocean acidification, but now he is in the business of studying weather weaponry. Of course that’s not what he calls it, nor do other geoengineers, but a rose of any other name. . . to quote Shakespeare.
In an interview with Yale Environment 360, Caldeira tries to explain why ‘geoengineering schemes might work.’ Is it possible that scientists who have been seeded with Rockefeller and Rothschild money might actually believe they are doing good?
“Scratching the veneer of some of the major climate change movers and shakers one finds a very well-financed assemblage of entities with major philanthropic foundation ties. Indeed, the Rockefeller Foundations alone are major players behind the anthropogenic global warming “activism” and propaganda. For example, in 2009 the Rockefeller Family Foundation gave $3,500,000 to Grace Communications Fund, an organization that “builds partnerships and develops innovative media strategies that increase public awareness of the relationships among food, water, and energy systems.”
Also in 2009 Rockefeller gave $775,000 to the Natural Resource Defense Council, whose foremost agenda is “curbing global warming” and “creating a clean energy future.” Another $650,000 was channeled to the World Wildlife Federation, $350,000 to the Center for Climate Strategies, and $200,000 to the Sierra Club.”
So, are these scientists truly in the interest of fighting global warming, or are they just puppets? To be fair, Caldeira says he was wrongly portrayed in a recent work called SuperFreakonomics, as were the prospects — and pitfalls — of plans to engineer the planet’s climate system. In trying to ‘save’ our climate, are government agencies looking at people dying and showing up with neurological disease as ‘externalities?’ How does spraying the entire world with carcinogenic chemicals without their consent amount to anything less than genocide?
In a healthy discourse on this subject, Amy Worthington of healthfreedominfo writes:
“Congressional hearings of 1975, 1977 and 1994 confirm in nauseating detail that our illustrious Department of Death has used the American population as hapless guinea pigs since WWII. Rutgers professor Leonard Cole collected from U.S. military records a horrifying list of biological and chemical agents furtively tested on American and Canadian civilian populations. In 1999, Jonathan Moreno of Clinton’s Committee on Human Radiation Experiments, also confirmed in his book Undue Risk decades of murderous military-intelligence experimentation on civilians without their knowledge or consent.”
In SuperFreakonomics, Nobel prize winner Paul Crutzen, a Dutch atmospheric scientist, was quoted. According to Levitt and Dubner, the authors, Crutzen stated that injecting sulfur in the atmosphere “is the only option available to rapidly reduce temperature rises and counteract other climatic effects.” That still doesn’t make it a smart thing to do – I don’t care how many Nobel prizes you’ve been given.
Caldeira even admits in this video, that “they [chemtrails] are likely to cause some damage in someplaces.” Other scientists in the video admit that potentially 2 million people could be ‘food-disrupted’ by monsoons, and other freakish weather patterns caused by chemtrails. . .some damage in some places. Why are these engineers allowed to continue this chemical mass spraying? Sure, it’s a slow death, but we all stand in denial of its occurrence.
What will it take to convince you?
The major fail here is that they have yet to prove with validity any “global warming.” Therefore, why the need for geo-engineering? It would be like asking freshly bathed and clean Jews to enter the “showers” at the concentration camps. Their rationale makes no sense to anyone paying attention. But then again, it’s not for people who are paying attention.
“Global Warming” is the built in excuse they will use to fall back on when the time comes that they actually have to admit that they have been spraying us like insects. The reality of it is, the spraying is not being done to counter global warming. What they are doing is actually causing the global weather problems. When used in conjunction with the ionospheric heaters installed around the globe, they are able to manipulate the weather at will. Desirable weather patterns could just as easily be created in the drought stricken areas but since those conditions were intentionally created, it would be counter productive to the desired goal of controlling the populations food and water supply. Logic would suggest that, if the globe is warming, then using machines that heat up the atmosphere is not logical. Besides, it goes much deeper than weather control. There are many invested interests in the spraying operation. For information on some of the other ‘ingredients’ being pumped into our air, check out the scientific research that has been conducted from the beginning by Cliff Carnicom. His research has revealed some extremely disturbing facts.
Gee, it only took 10 days for my comment above to get posted.
I am deeply disappointed by this article that purports to validate chemtrails, without including a shred of evidence of their existence. That’s because, although various forms of geoengineering have been under discussion, none has yet been undertaken — which suggests that our species is not quite so keen on hastening the end of life on the planet as would at first seem.
A story like this does two things: encourages the conspiracy theorists with innuendo and fear-mongering, and draws eyeballs via the sensational headline. What’s next, denying evolution? I can no longer take you seriously, Natural Society. You’ve lost all credibility.
Did you watch the video, to find out about it? I doubt it.
Islander 2010
Please explain the massive crisscrossing of our skies with fanning out Chem trails in areas that do not have any where that many jet crossings. In our rural area, a jet obviously in trouble flew very low over our heads. WE SAW TANKS AND SPRAY ARMS It was not an agricultural spray plane it was a massive jet that rattled buildings.
Do you not even have eyes? Or is it just to hard to see with your head up your ass?
Thank you for writing this article. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Interesting, how some people still think it is a ‘conspiracy theory’ when there are soooooo many scientific proof of how bad it is. We do not need to be a scientist to know that by spaying aluminum, and so many other toxins from planes ALL day long, for decades now that they are falling on us. It is in the air we breathe, in our food, water, EVERYTHING! And it is messing with the weather natural rhythm. The ‘global warming’ is MEN made! Don’t forget to mention HAARP, weather manipulation, which they are using it as a WEAPON! “Conspiracy theory” is for people that cannot accept and can not handle the TRUTH!
Why are some of my comments still ‘pending’ moderation after more than 2 days? They contain nothing vulgar or slanderous or disrespectful to anyone else, only cold hard facts. Is this site just another puppet of the corporate elite by censoring information that doesn’t fit their agenda?