Comments on: FDA Pushes to Release Genetically Modified Salmon into Environment

By: MegaSolipsist

MegaSolipsist — Fri, 26 Apr 2013 23:59:18 +0000

You can practically taste the vitriol the author of this site has for GMOs.
Genetic modification is an incredibly safe line of research, as reality is far removed from a Michael Crichton novel.
I agree that the food should be labelled as GMO, but the whole thing about it having unintended side effects is overly dramatised.

By: mark

mark — Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:51:12 +0000

you got that right.every one bitches but never takes a stand

By: mark

mark — Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:47:23 +0000

even more dispicable then the gmo issue itself is how is it allowed that these executives from these biotech corporations such as monsanto are allowed to serve in the fda in a capacity inwhich they have the power to bypass laws that govern our safety .and to put us all at risk for the sake of monetary gains,maybe we should look into their finances,can you say colution?

By: BreezyB

BreezyB — Mon, 18 Mar 2013 01:59:27 +0000

Not only would our entire salmon supply be affected but the animals that consume them in the wild as well. Look at our GMO eating cattle and the affect when we consume them.. Taste and quality obviously affected.

By: Lynne

Lynne — Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:23:08 +0000

The real issue here is the insistence on having investors-it's the money, stupid. If we, as a global society abolished the debt-based money system with usury laws and instituted a resource based economy across the globe we would be able to together create a world that was safe and nurturing for all of us.

By: Linda T. Sturgis

Linda T. Sturgis — Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:27:30 +0000

The FDA should NOT release mutant fish. We need to keep the gene pook pure!

By: Martin

Martin — Fri, 28 Dec 2012 04:11:13 +0000

It's simple. You either conduct proper research – take 20 years or so to determine that it's safe or you label it and let people decide for themselves whether or not they want to be part of your experiment. You can't on one hand insist that it (GE Salmon) doesn't need to be labeled because it is "substantially the same" as what exists in nature, while at the same time insist that you are entitled to protection under patent law.

By: Tim

Tim — Thu, 27 Dec 2012 23:16:28 +0000

Yep. there's plenty of GMO veggies out there for ya to eat. Sure, most get fed to dairy cows and other farm animals and then we get to drink 'em in our milk or eat 'em in our meat, but there's already millions of acres of GMO contaminated corn that Monsanto is trying to sue farmer's for growing when the pollen blew across the road and fertilized non-GMO corn the farmers were growing and that corn suddenly became immune to root-sucking root worms the following year. The only safe stuff is what you grow yourself!

By: Tim

Tim — Thu, 27 Dec 2012 23:08:21 +0000

History shows again and again, nature points out the folly of men…. Go, go, go Godzilla….

By: Tim

Tim — Thu, 27 Dec 2012 23:04:22 +0000

Go, go, go, Godzilla….