Print Friendly and PDF

AMA Paper Proposes Law Forcing People into Experimental Vaccine Trials

Mike Barrett
January 27th, 2012
Updated 11/06/2012 at 12:55 pm
Pin It

vaccinedrip 210x131 AMA Paper Proposes Law Forcing People into Experimental Vaccine Trials

How would you react if I were to tell you that you or your child were forced to participate in experimental vaccine trials? A paper published by the American Medical Association’s Virtual Mentor wants to do just that. It seems that the amount of current participants in current experimental vaccine trials is a bit too low, so why not create a federal law forcing each person to need to “opt-out” of experimental vaccine trials in an attempt to better society?

‘Forcing’ Individuals to Participate in Experimental Vaccine Trials

The proposed law is lunacy to say that least, stating that individuals must make a “mandated choice” to participate in such experimental trials. People shouldn’t be automatically enrolled in experimental trials or need to state in advance their decision to “opt-out”. Along with the law will come a customer list for big pharma, where each participant’s information will be shared with the pharmaceutical companies in order to gather trial and field test data. Of course this isn’t so different from how things operate now, where individuals are enrolled into big pharma’s database even if you exempt your child from vaccination. But if big pharma can’t produce enough positive data from those who actually want to volunteer for introducing a new product to the FDA for approval, they may just try to force people to participate or use a segment of the population that is ignorant to the laws surrounding the trials.

What happens if these experimental vaccines cause harm? There are laws already set in place that essentially give vaccine manufacturers immunity to legal repercussions. That is to say that if your child is harmed from a vaccine, the vaccine manufacturers are not financially or morally responsible. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 protects vaccine manufacturers from any liability.

Another example of similar medical and political tyranny is when a document was signed by Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, where both vaccine makers and federal officials were granted complete legal immunity from any repercussions — regardless of whether or not the case is valid. Signed in July of 2009 by Sebelius, the document drew upon the provisions of a law signed in 2006 created for public emergencies. Granting swine flu vaccine makers legal protection and establishing a compensation fund, the legislation allows for vaccine makers to virtually disregard consumer safety.

It is interesting to note that these laws are still needed even though health officials and vaccine makers tout vaccines as being 99.99% effective. But it isn’t so surprising, given the countless occasions in which vaccines have ruined both the lives of children and parents. Furthermore, previous attempts to test the anthrax vaccine on unsuspecting participants went sour after the public was alerted to the shocking history behind the anthrax vaccine. In a 2007 report by the CDC in conjunction with theVaccine Healthcare Centers of the Department of Defense and the watchdog group Government Accountability found that ”between 1 and 2 percent” of vaccinated military personnel experienced ”severe adverse events, which could result in disability or death.”As a result of public outrage, the government called off the testing.

What would even happen if there were complications in future trials? Going by past history with other experimental vaccines, severe complications would probably just be hidden. The controversial trials of experimental AIDS vaccines that led to the loss of innocent lives have already been ignored by mainstream scientists and reporters. Even the scientists responsible for the deaths covered up the situation, failing to report the fatalities of their trials in order to prevent the public from finding out.

Giving big pharma a guaranteed customer list of  individuals while simultaneously giving them immunity from lawsuits is quite the deal. Through activism and spreading the word, hopefully such a deal will not be made.

About Mike Barrett:
2.thumbnail AMA Paper Proposes Law Forcing People into Experimental Vaccine Trials Google Plus Profile |Mike is the co-founder, editor, and researcher behind Natural Society. Studying the work of top natural health activists, and writing special reports for top 10 alternative health websites, Mike has written hundreds of articles and pages on how to obtain optimum wellness through natural health.

From around the web:

  • Colloidal Silverwrks

    More like "Forced Inoculations" since childbirth we are injected with stuff designed to shorten the life span.

  • colloidalsilverwrks

    I think natural antibiotics is the best way to go, big pharma just wants to push thier patented drugs regardless of the cost of live.

  • Frank Jasi

    Your all correct,become part of the resistance, vote Ron Paul,listen to Info The message is getting out !

  • hawkeye

    Everyone commenting here is really smart. I like what everyone is saying. Why do you think "they" are forcing this Obamacare on us?? It's so they can force us to take their poison, toxic vaccines, and they are lying when they say that you will give diseases to people if you don't take their vaccine. I don't believe that BS. Here is what parents can do, and I have done this myself….Go to your local health department and get a religious exemption from them for your children, so they don't have to have any shots in order to go to school (aka…brainwashing camp) What you tell them is you don't believe in that and don't allow your children to get them. When they had me fill out who our doctor was, I put, "Jesus" on the line. My son has NEVER had a shot, ever in his life, and is now 22 years old. He was breast fed as a baby till he was one year old. The worst thing he's gotten is chicken pox one time, and of course he had the flu one time, when he was in school, but overall, he has been extremely healthy, and that is my experience of NOT having vaccines. Like Nancy Reagan said in her campaign when she was in the white house as first lady…"JUST SAY NO TO DRUGS" and JUST SAY NO TO VACCINES AND FDA, AMA, ETC. So everybody just load up on ammo so that when "they" come to your house to force you to take their vaccination, let's see WHO will take the first SHOT!!

  • MSR

    To tk:

    You think this is sensationalism? I was told I needed to get a vaccine for the flu at my workplace and I declined. They wanted me to sign a declination form that stated, among other things, that I knew I was endangering others by not getting the flue shot! I refused to sign it. It may become mandatory for us. What do you have to say to that? Don't YOU discount what we are saying. You obviously still believe that everything is done for our own good, and the government knows best. Why don't you move to a communist country if you want someone else to control your rights.

  • Kate

    I agree with the first comment. Let the vaccine makers, AMA jerks and others be the first to be forced to take killer vaccines. These scumbags are satanists and supposed elitists who want to kill off 90% of the world's population. Look up the "Georgia Guidestones" in the state of Georgia, USA for their stated goal of keeping the population of the planet at 500 million. Guess that means we all have to die, and what better way than to force injections of toxic poisons on us and our children.

  • M Schultz

    All vaccines should be tested on the employees and employees children of the companies manufacturing and distributing the vaccines, the designers of the vaccines and their children and all doctors and their children, all those who administers vaccines and their children, all the members of the legislature and their children, and all who work for the FDA and the USDA and their children before the public is asked to get ANY vaccines.

    I think that would work.

  • tk

    Instead of jumping to panicky pronouncements of conspiracies and totalitarian machinations, why not peruse the article in question? Nowhere does it say people will be forced to "opt-out" (implying tacit agreement to participate if one does nothing). It suggests people should be required to state their willingness to participate, thus enabling identification of a willing research pool. Vapid sensationalist articles like this undermine your credibility among anyone but the most credulous. Please, don't make it so easy for people to discount what you're saying here.

    • VD

      If you have to "opt-out" how long before they make it so it is almost impossible to do that. They should not be making any laws to this nature at all.

  • Italics Mine

    Will these experimental vaccine trials take place in Tuskegee?

    • T

      Good one!

  • Al Atomicus

    With so many failed vaccines, why do they want to force feed vaccines on children.

    Untested on kids, what about the side effect, or brain damage they could cause later on in life?

    • mary

  • The Humoungus

    Since the AMA was illegally created by the jew

    Rockefellers in the early 1900's to blackmail

    medical colleges into pushing drugs for everything..

    they won't mind if I say.. try it.

    Guns are waiting.

    LOTS of guns.

    And lots of people not afraid to use them.

    • mary


  • Robert

    Forced into a vaccine trial? Here is a very good reason for gun ownership in America.

  • jasik

    kozacke riesenie—————————————————————————-

    If we want to take over the government we have to give the people more than promises. We have to guarantee that our government will not dominate the people but serve the people. The guarantee is going to be given in the form of a declaration signed by every member of the government and every state employee stating that if I betray the nation, if I steal from the nation, if I do anything fraudulent knowingly I do Know and accept there will be only one punishment, death. This legal change of government will require a new political party from the people, willing to guarantee honesty in the government. Because of freedom in thinking, there are no innocent bystanders. How many will refuse to vote for a future president willing to guarantee the honesty of government with his life?

  • james

    Just another example of the arrogance of those elitist monoplies using the corrupt system to promote their agenda.

    Apathy is the enemy of LIBERTY and the very thing that brings about the systematic decline in freedoms, justice and self-determination..and the means by which those who would manipulate and control you, do exactly that.

    For those who are skeptical, un-decided, un-informed or simply something now; it's time to wake up.

    Vote for Ron Paul…

    What's the worst that can happen? A four year moratorium on the draconian legislation that's been taking place almost on a daily basis! Legislation that impacts on you..and your children.

    What's the best that can happen?..the return to an America that stands for truth, justice, liberty and prosperity..remember how that used to be??

    • Anonymous

      James, couldn't have said it better! Ron Paul 2012

  • Ryan

    They've been experimenting on people without their knowledge for decades there is such a blow back of fear that these criminal cowards are trying to use their powers to absolve their liability. We're winning, though, that's why the big panic for internet control. Their going to jail instead, or will be exposed to face the questions from generations of young to come.

  • ryan Paravecchio

    They've been experimenting on people without their knowledge for decades there is such a blow back of fear that these criminal cowards are trying to use their powers to absolve their liability. We're winning though that's why the big panic for internet control. Their going to jail instead, or will be exposed to face the questions from generations of young to come.