Print Friendly and PDF

41 States Sell Out to Merck’s HPV Shot Gardasil Vaccine Lobbyists

Tim McCoy
by
March 9th, 2012
Updated 05/20/2013 at 1:41 am
Pin It

vaccineneedle1 220x137 41 States Sell Out to Mercks HPV Shot Gardasil Vaccine Lobbyists

Since 2006, 41 states have introduced legislation to support the HPV vaccine industry, despite the danger of death and injury. Shockingly, Dr. Diane Harper, a lead developer of Merck’s Gardasil HPV vaccine, warns against Gardasil vaccine deaths and she advocates complete disclosure about the risk of death and adverse reactions (including Guillian-Barre syndrome) to parents and patients. Dr. Harper also acknowledges that the CDC’s death rate data is skewed.

95% of infections from HPV resolve on their own with zero government intervention. Cervical cancer is rare, and only 10% of adverse reactions to vaccines are reported. Merck and GSK are the top 2 HPV vaccine makers.

The HPV vaccine legislation in 41 states includes mandatory vaccination, funding Merck and GSK’s HPV vaccines, removing parental rights by removing parental consent for the HPV vaccine, or educating the public about the HPV virus. Currently, New York is considering legislation making vaccines mandatory.

The federal government funds HPV vaccinations to a large degree. The HPV vaccine is given in 3 doses and costs over $300. Most of the girls targeted for HPV vaccination conveniently have private insurance.

With this much money on the table, greedy vaccine makers are pushing the HPV vaccine that was designed to treat cervical cancer, on boys (note to Merck & GSK: males do not have cervixes). The HPV vaccine industry promotes vaccination in men and boys using the excuse that they could contract cancer from the HPV virus through anal and oral sex. However, the CDC admits that it does not know the efficacy rates of the drug for males and advises against ‘routine vaccination’.

School vaccination requirements are usually decided by state legislatures, although some have handed this power over to unaccountable agencies like state Health Departments  These agencies are reliant on the legislatures for funding, therefore, responsibility ultimately lies with the legislature.

Merck HPV Lobbying Scandal

Merck had a very strong lobbying campaign for state mandates in 2007 to REQUIRE its Gardasil vaccine. There was so much backlash over Big Pharma’s influence over government that Merck backed off of lobbying for a mandatory HPV vaccine, saying that the timing wasn’t right.

However, Merck continued to lobby for financing of their vaccines. The amount of funding for Merck’s vaccine lobbying is unknown.

Women in Government (WIG)

Merck is financial backer of Women in Government (WIG), a national non profit organization of of legislators that has heavily influenced state politics. WIG is responsible for getting 39 states to formally introduce legislation or resolutions for calling attention to cancer linked to HPV.

WIG’s own website heralds the news that it has received over $18 million in funding from corporations, foundations and individuals. In 2009 alone, WIG receivedover $1.7 million from unnamed donors.

Is it possible that Women in Government is a front organization for Merck to push its deadly HPV vaccine? What is the motivation for women legislators to support risky vaccines that can kill young girls?

According to the website cogforlife.org, WIG is only the tip of the lobbying iceberg as Merck spent tens of millions of dollars on funding other so-called non profits in order to saturate the media and prepare the public to embrace mandatory HPV vaccines.

How to Thwart the HPV Vaccine Lobby

Merck appears to believe that lobbying state legislators is the most effective way to require that their vaccines be forced on children. Therefore, the most effective way to stop Merck’s efforts is for the people to educate state legislators and to build strong, organized support groups with other concerned parents and citizens.

Concerned individuals can do their part by sharing information about the danger of the HPV vaccine with simple flyers that Natural Society will be releasing in the near future to better inform the public.

From around the web:

  • Mindanoiha

    GARDASIL!

    Next time a doctor, vaccine nurse, health authorities, media or other promoters suggest this vaccine, ask them to provide serious unbiased peer reviewed studies with documentation for all these hitherto unanswered questions:

    Whether it prevents cancer, necessity for boosters, whether it increases the risk of cancer, whether there is increased risk of cancer due to the unexpected discovery by an independent laboratory of aluminium bound recombinant HPV DNA, whether Gardasil vaccinated may donate blood without the aluminium bound recombinant HPV DNA causing serious health consequences for the recipient, whether there is increased risk of autoimmune disorders due to the recombinant HPV DNA, if HPV is necessarily an infection transmitted by sexual intercourse, whether the vaccine causes genotoxicity, whether it targets the relevant virus strains in different demographics, whether the strains change in the course of time, adverse events due to concomitant administration with other vaccines, the true numbers and extent of serious adverse events, long term serious side effects, what the results would be if a true placebo had been used in all the clinical trials, what the results of clinical trials would be if Merck had not used their own exclusion criteria, whether there is increased risk of blood clots when Gardasil is combined with hormonal contraceptive pills, whether there is an increased risk of brain damage, consequences of “bridging” – the extrapolation of study results from one group to another, potentially serious consequences if the vaccine is not thoroughly shaken, whether the vaccine will increase the risk of infertility due to polysorbate, whether polysorbate is carcinogenic, health consequences due to the presence of the combination of polysorbate and l-histidine, whether aluminium adjuvant is safe, consequences due to the presence sodium borate (borax), whether the vaccine will increase the risk of miscarriages, stillbirths or babies born with anomalies, whether Gardasil is excreted in human milk, the complete list of ingredients, whether possible benefits outweigh the risks.

    Merck the manufacturer is believed by many to have a culture of corruption and criminality. It may be wise to also ask for documentation to prove that this is not the case.

    After you are completely satisfied with all the answers, then you can start considering whether or not to take this vaccine!

  • organic dream

    There trying to give it to high school girl grade 8 in Canada. i looked up whats in the vaccine, one ingredients is the same thing they put into ice cream to make it creamy alone with all the other toxic crap obviously having girls I told them were to stick there HPV

  • Leticia

    It scares me to know our freedoms are essentially a breath away from becoming extinct….our freedoms rest between the actions of greedy corporations (including Big Pharma) and the decisions of greedy politicians. SCARY.

  • VPutin56

    No member of my family will ever be vaccinated against their will. Anyone, anyone, attempting to do so, I will kill.

  • Eric Gunther Oberhau

    This is all a jewish plot to kill as many WHITE girls and women as possible. The BIBLE says that they are here to KILL, STEAL, and destroy, Look who owns the company that has created this evil killing tool. It is jew owned.

  • Outraged

    All the Merck lobbyist bitches should be rounded up and each be given ten times the normal dosage of a Gardasil vaccine.

    Sorry if it sounds extremist but the only way you can fight the syringe is with a gun. These crooks in Big Pharma and DC are blinded by profit, they will not listen to reason.

    Perhaps bullets will help restore their sight. If they cannot see the error of their ways, then they shall see fear.

    • Sundi

      I totally support the idea, but honestly, it will only take ONE normal vaccine to do them harm. I know this for a fact, sad to say.

    • Leticia

      That's why they are working on getting rid of guns and eliminasting exemtpions from vaccinations, thereby making them mandatory.

  • Paddy

    Dear Friends,

    I recall reading a report early in the HPV debate that stated the vaccine was actually designed for young women within the early-20's to mid-30's range who were sexually active — yet it was only effective against a small portion of the bacteria/virus that cause HPV; therefore, it served small purpose in the eradication of HPV.

    Try as I might, I have not been able to relocate that article. Any ideas where I could look ?

    • http://james.com Aliens

      Government classified information?

    • guest

      Paddy you are absolutely correct. And I have not been able to re-locate that report via internet either. It was my family doctor who brought it to my attention when it first came out and I asked him if my young daughters should have it. He told me no and explained all the dangers and that it should NOT be on the market much less be given to anyone. He went on to say, give it about 6 more years and there will be more conclusive reports on the dangers of it and the ineffectiveness. (Sure enough, he was right). When I got home I searched for more info on it and everything he told me was confirmed in medical research and reports. I have been able to locate a number of reports and pictures of many girls and young women who have suffered adverse reactions and death from this "vaccine." I found that on the internet a couple months ago. This drug is not safe and furthermore, is NOT proven effective, just the opposite on both safety and effectiveness.

    • guest

      Paddy – I also remember that after this first report to give it to young women, the report you are speaking of, there was later a report that came out saying they have decided that it is most effective when given BEFORE any sexual activity so directed it to UP TO 11 year olds. Saying it should be given as babies because many girls are becoming sexually active younger than before. Stating even as young as 8 were sexually active. B.S.!!