Print Friendly and PDF

49 Dead, Others Hospitalized After Gardasil HPV Vaccine

Anthony Gucciardi
by
August 22nd, 2011
Updated 11/11/2012 at 7:54 pm
Pin It

kidgirllittle2 210x131 49 Dead, Others Hospitalized After Gardasil HPV Vaccine

Following controversy over U.S. state legislatures requiring young girls to take Gardasil, Merck’s vaccine for human papillomavirus (HPV), a number of severe side effects have been observed along with the recent deaths of 3 young girls. Gardasil is now marketed towards men and women up to age 26 as a “preventative” tool against anal cancer. As of January 2010, Gardasil has been linked to 49 deaths and countless side-effects, while cancer associated with HPV is only responsible for 1% of all cancer deaths. Why then, is it being recommended to millions worldwide?

As of June 2009, 15 million girls have been injected with the Gardasil vaccine. Out of 15 million people, 49 deaths may not seem like a lot. Unfortunately, however, there are many more cases of extreme side effects from the vaccination. In fact, the amount of adverse reactions was so high that Judicial Watch, a group that claims to expose government corruption, was forced to step in. Between May 2009 and September 2010 alone, Gardasil was linked to 3,589 harmful reactions and 16 deaths. Of the 3,589 adverse reactions, many were debilitating. Permanent disability was the result of 213 cases; 25 resulted in the diagnosis of Guillain-Barre Syndrome; and there were 789 other “serious” reports according to FDA documents.

In August 2008, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) required all female immigrants between the ages of 11 and 26 to receive at least one dose of the Gardasil vaccination if they planned on entering the United States. The enforcement was due to a law created in 1996 that required immigrants to receive any vaccination that was recommended by the United States government. The difference between the citizens of the U.S. and the immigrants seeking refuge within the country, is that the citizens can refuse any vaccination they do not wish to receive. While the requirement was lifted on December 14, 2009, countless immigrants were affected. This held especially true for the female immigrants who intended to have children. According to reports, 28 women experienced miscarriages within 30 days of receiving the Gardasil injection. In response, the FDA said it is not worth investigating. Going against the FDA claims that Gardasil was completely safe, some government officials expressed concern over the fact that Gardasil was ever recommended for U.S. citizens.

vaccinezoom 210x131 49 Dead, Others Hospitalized After Gardasil HPV Vaccine

“If we had known about it, we would have said it’s not a good idea,”

“If we had known about it, we would have said it’s not a good idea,” said Jon Abramson, the former chairman of the CDC’s Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices.

Dr. Diane Harper was the lead researcher during the creation of both Gardasil and a similar vaccine, Cervarix. Leading the research team gave Dr. Harper an inside look at the effects of Gardasil, which she has been exposing for over a year. Dr. Harper said that Gardasil would do very little to fight cervical cancer, and at the very least it should not be recommended to children younger than 15.

Unfortunately, the CDC did not agree, boasting about the anti-cancer effects of Gardasil and even going as far as to recommend it to girls as young as 9. Dr. Harper says that 70% of all HPV infections resolve themselves within a year, and within 2 years the percentage climbs to 90%. During an address at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination, Dr. Harper explained the risks associated with Gardasil. Instead of promoting the vaccine, which was expected of her, she told the truth. The audience was dazzled.

“I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need the vaccine at all,” said Joan Robinson, Assistant Editor at the Population Research Institute.

Experts have spoken out, and the documents have been released. Gardasil is a deadly injection that claims to treat an infection that has a 90% chance to resolve itself within two years. With Rick Perry’s failed attempt to force Gardasil on Texan schoolgirls, it is easy to see that the world has awoken to the truth regarding Gardasil. The research is clear: stay away from this poison serum.

Additional Sources:

BMJ.com

USA Today

Washington Examiner

MSNBC

Fox News

About Anthony Gucciardi:
1.thumbnail 49 Dead, Others Hospitalized After Gardasil HPV VaccineGoogle Plus ProfileAnthony is the Editor of NaturalSociety whose work has been read by millions worldwide and is routinely featured on major alternative and mainstream news website alike, including the powerful Drudge Report, NaturalNews, Daily Mail, and many others. Anthony has appeared on programs like Russia Today (RT), Savage Nation, The Alex Jones Show, Coast to Coast AM, and many others. Anthony is also dedicated to aiding various non-profit organizations focused around health and rehabilitation as well as the creator of the independent political website Storyleak

From around the web:

  • Yuppers

    CDC shill

  • American

    This story has been found to be a hoax. Are all these anti vaccine people liars???

  • http://Www.getjealous.com/redfatherland2830/journal/2783465/what-to-expect-from-laser-tattoo-removal.html laser tattoo removal stevenage

    Howdy! Someone in my Myspace group shared this site with us so I came to give it a look.
    I’m definitely loving the information. I’m bookmarking
    and will be tweeting this to my followers!
    Terrific blog and outstanding design and style.

  • http://papertowelcoupon.webstarts.com/ Paper towel Holders

    Your way of describing all in this article is really good,
    every one can simply be aware of it, Thanks a lot.

  • Delores

    People are so silly smdh.

  • Lisa

    Hi, I'm sorry, but as a student of Biology and basic Public Health, it is so easy to see that you're reporting is biased and that you are maneuvering statistics to say what you want to mean. For one, you shouldn't bold that it was linked to 49 deaths when it was later found that it was only linked to 16. Also, you say cervical cancer only accounts for 1% of all cancer deaths… but you neglect to mention that this figure is still equivalent to over 4,000 deaths in 2012. Not to mention the over 12,000 new cases that same year. Even taking into account that Gardasil does not cover about 10% of cancer causing HPV, the figures still add up to more than the amount of people who experience the "serious" adverse side effects and death combined. Oh, did you like how I put "serious" in quotation marks to detract from its meaning? Yeah, you did that too in your reference to "'preventative' medicine." And I'm sorry, but you should be aware that preventative medicine is extremely important to 'preventing' very serious health concerns

    • Lisa H.

      I have a friend who has had the shots. She lost the use of her right arm , where she received two shots, for over two years. And only regained movement after a year of Physical Therepy. She also had sever seizures and suffers from memory loss over the last three years. During all this the Doctors said it was "all in your head." The HPV vacine has caused her to lose three years of her life. She and I count her as luck that she is alive and is getting better.

      HPV can be found and treated before it can cause cancer. Gardasil is a unneeded vacine and in my opinion should be taken off the market. I have seen the "serious" side effects first hand. Prevention by yearly doctor visits is KEY, NOT GARDASIL!

    • Mary

      Hi Lisa–so glad you are so concerned about health! Are you becoming an allopathic doctor? Good for you! Be sure to print out this form so you can fill it out and give it to your patients before you administer vaccines!

      Good luck to you!

      Physician's Warranty of Vaccine Safety

      I (Physician's name, degree)_________________________, _____ am a physician licensed to

      practice medicine in the State/Province of ________________, in the country of

      _________________. My State/Province license number is _______________ , and (if the USA)

      my DEA number is _______________. My medical specialty is ________________________

      I have a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of all the medications that I prescribe for

      or administer to my patients. In the case of (Patient's name) ___________________________ , age

      _________ , whom I have examined, I find that certain risk factors exist that justify the

      recommended vaccinations. The following is a list of said risk factors and the vaccinations that will

      protect against them:

      Risk Factor ____________________________________________

      Vaccination ___________________________________________

      Risk Factor ____________________________________________

      Vaccination ___________________________________________

      Risk Factor ____________________________________________

      Vaccination ___________________________________________

      Risk Factor ____________________________________________

      Vaccination ___________________________________________

      Risk Factor ____________________________________________

      Vaccination ___________________________________________

      Risk Factor ____________________________________________

      Vaccination ___________________________________________

      I am aware that vaccines typically contain many of the following fillers:

      * aluminum hydroxide

      * aluminum phosphate

      * ammonium sulfate

      * amphotericin B

      * animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain,

      * dog kidney, monkey kidney,

      * chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg

      * calf (bovine) serum

      * betapropiolactone

      * fetal bovine serum

      * formaldehyde

      * formalin

      * gelatin

      * glycerol

      * human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)

      * hydrolized gelatin

      * mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate(r))

      * monosodium glutamate (MSG)

      * neomycin

      * neomycin sulfate

      * phenol red indicator

      * phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)

      * potassium diphosphate

      * potassium monophosphate

      * polymyxin B

      * polysorbate 20

      * polysorbate 80

      * porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein

      * residual MRC5 proteins

      * sorbitol

      * tri(n)butylphosphate,

      * VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells, and

      * washed sheep red blood

      and, hereby, warrant that these ingredients are safe for injection into the body of my patient. I have

      researched reports to the contrary, such as reports that mercury thimerosol causes severe

      neurological and immunological damage, and find that they are not credible.

      I am aware that some vaccines have been found to have been contaminated with Simian Virus 40

      (SV 40) and that SV 40 is causally linked by some researchers to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and

      mesotheliomas in humans as well as in experimental animals. I hereby warrant that the vaccines I

      employ in my practice do not contain SV 40 or any other live viruses. (Alternately, I hereby warrant

      that said SV-40 virus or other viruses pose no substantive risk to my patient.)

      I hereby warrant that the vaccines I am recommending for the care of (Patient's name)

      _______________ _______________________ do not contain any tissue from aborted human

      babies (also known as "fetuses").

      In order to protect my patient's well being, I have taken the following steps to guarantee that the

      vaccines I will use will contain no damaging contaminants.

      STEPS TAKEN: ______________________________________________________

      ____________________________________________________________________

      ____________________________________________________________________

      ____________________________________________________________________

      I have personally investigated the reports made to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting

      System) and state that it is my professional opinion that the vaccines I am recommending are safe

      for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.

      The bases for my opinion are itemized on Exhibit A, attached hereto, — "Physician's Bases for

      Professional Opinion of Vaccine Safety." (Please itemize each recommended vaccine separately

      along with the bases for arriving at the conclusion that the vaccine is safe for administration to a

      child under the age of 5 years.)

      The professional journal articles I have relied upon in the issuance of this Physician's Warranty of

      Vaccine Safety are itemized on Exhibit B , attached hereto, — "Scientific Articles in Support of

      Physician's Warranty of Vaccine Safety."

      The professional journal articles that I have read which contain opinions adverse to my opinion are

      itemized on Exhibit C , attached hereto, — "Scientific Articles Contrary to Physician's Opinion of

      Vaccine Safety"

      The reasons for my determining that the articles in Exhibit C were invalid are delineated in

      Attachment D , attached hereto, — "Physician's Reasons for Determining the Invalidity of Adverse

      Scientific Opinions."

      Hepatitis B

      I understand that 60 percent of patients who are vaccinated for Hepatitis B will lose detectable

      antibodies to Hepatitis B within 12 years. I understand that in 1996 only 54 cases of Hepatitis B

      were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 year age group. I understand that in the VAERS, there were

      1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1 year age group,

      with 47 deaths reported.

      I understand that 50 percent of patients who contract Hepatitis B develop no symptoms after

      exposure. I understand that 30 percent will develop only flu-like symptoms and will have lifetime

      immunity. I understand that 20 percent will develop the symptoms of the disease, but that 95

      percent will fully recover and have lifetime immunity.

      I understand that 5 percent of the patients who are exposed to Hepatitis B will become chronic

      carriers of the disease. I understand that 75 percent of the chronic carriers will live with an

      asymptomatic infection and that only 25 percent of the chronic carriers will develop chronic liver

      disease or liver cancer, 10-30 years after the acute infection. The following scientific studies have

      been performed to demonstrate the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine in children under the age of 5

      years.

      _______________________________________________________________________

      _______________________________________________________________________

      _______________________________________________________________________

      In addition to the recommended vaccinations as protections against the above cited risk factors, I

      have recommended other non-vaccine measures to protect the health of my patient and have

      enumerated said non-vaccine measures on Exhibit D , attached hereto, "Non-vaccine Measures to

      Protect Against Risk Factors" I am issuing this Physician's Warranty of Vaccine Safety in my

      professional capacity as the attending physician to (Patient's name) _________________________.

      Regardless of the legal entity under which I normally practice medicine, I am issuing this statement

      in both my business and individual capacities and hereby waive any statutory, Common Law,

      Constitutional, UCC, international treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in

      the instant case. I issue this document of my own free will after consultation with competent legal

      counsel whose name is _________________________, an attorney admitted to the Bar in the

      State/Province of __________________.

      __________________________________ (Name of Attending Physician)

      __________________________________ L.S. (Signature of Attending Physician)

      Signed on this _______ day of ______________ A.D. ________

      Witness: _______________________________ Date: _____________________

      Notary Public: ___________________________Date: ______________________

      • Kate

        Gotta love you for this document, Mary! I will print it and stick it in my folder at PCP office, so they stop pestering me to get shots, mammograms, X-rays and other invasive measures, yet cannot read blood work results.

        • james

          Hilarious. I love how your justification started with "I have a friend ___". Great for your attempt to convey a position supported with almost no empiric evidence, but effectively useless in public health policy that affects millions of lives. I'll go out on a limb and say the 4,021 women who died from cervical cancer in 2007
          (U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2007 Incidence and Mortality. CDC; 2010.) had friends too. Take note of the above reference to peer-reviewed research supporting what I've stated.

          You said, "HPV can be found and treated before it can cause cancer."

          I assume you mean cervical cancer can be treated, and you are right, but sadly not all women who receive treatment will be cured. In fact, only 85% of women diagnosed with early stage cervical cancer who underwent surgical management went 3-years without recurrence of their cancer (Delgado G, et al. Prospective surgical-pathological study of disease-free interval in patients with stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;38(3):352.). The stats for women with advanced disease are much worse and I encourage you to look into them.

          Kate, this made me laugh, because in your second comment you expressed your distain for invasive procedures, like mammograms… Do you understand how health care providers screen for cervical cancer? I think most women would consider pap smears invasive… However, it is important to note that before the pap smear, cervical cancer was a leading cause of death in women the world over. While this screening exam has saved countless lives, today thousands of women in the US die yearly, the majority of which are impoverished, ethnic minorities (Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(4):212.). And cervical cancer is still a leading cause of death in women in developing countries.

          This vaccine (like the many others that came before it) has the potential to change the life-expectancy of countless women, and positively effect the health and well-being of patients and families alike. I fully support peer-reviewed research that tests the merits of the HPV vaccine, but I will not tolerate unsupported fear mongering.

          Lastly, I am not aware of any disease process attributed to vaccination that would explain your friend’s symptoms.